hypochondriac

Didn't read it but I'm sure it was fascinating.

I agree that's basically our major problem. I personally can't believe there isn't a way we could play that gets the best out of Archer and it probably involves Armstrong coming in from the right.

But we know that Armstrong and Archer don't really work up top on their own.

Don't get me wrong I would much rather drop manning I just don't think we will.

Without Stewart I think we need to play something like McCarthy Jelert Edwards/Wood Quarshire Manning Jander Charles Fellows Scienza Armstrong Archer I'm not sure there's space for Azaz.

I agree. I'm not sure what formation to play up front without Stewart. I'm not sure that aspect is entirely Still's fault.

He thinks I hate all Muslims, I'm racist, etc etc. Most of it stems from not agreeing with him on Israel.

Zero hindsight. Questioning spending that much on a young inexperienced player with potential as the main striker signing this summer happened when he was signed and certainly a few weeks into the season before the window shut. Saying it wouldn't be sensible to rely on Stewart given his injury record isn't prophecy either as most people would have said that at the time too.

We 100% need a keeper but we may get away with that because McCarthy is performing quite well. Getting rid of Ramsdale is fairnenough if he wanted to go but to loan him out and use that as justification for not bringing in a proper keeper for this season is madness.

I love how you think I surreptitiously put a qualifier in my condemnation of a mosque attack because secretly I thought that burning down mosques is alright in circumstances not involving a response to Jews being killed. If I thought that burning down mosques was acceptable I'd just say it.

Cute.

Read whatever you like. Why you think I'd want to save face at something you've posted is beyond me.

I know what I meant when I posted it, there's no rowing back of any kind. I'll spell it out for you if you like. This burning of a mosque is likely done in response to the synagogue attack. That is not a justification for the act, simply what the perpetrators would view as a motivation. Rather like saying the individual who attacked a synagogue in response to the actions of Israel is disgusting. That's not excusing anyone who happens to attack a synagogue unrelated to anything Israel has done, that's your uncharitable interpretation of what was written. I've now helped you understand better what the meaning behind my post was as it wasn't cryptic. You can continue to suggest I'm lying and that I actually support some attacks on mosques or you can accept what I'm telling you. Either way it's on you.

Perhaps if you're having difficulty interpreting what I've written perhaps seek some clarification. I've told you the meaning of my post.

It's tiresome to have to repeat what I've already written but which but of the following post suggested that every wrong could be spotted or stopped? "Obviously the types of threat and the severity of the threat would change and you're not going to be able to prevent every terror attack but you'd change things as the facts change."

Lol. If I ranked a list of posters on here based on who I'd listen to about advice on attitude or opinions you'd be near the bottom. Above soggy though tbf.

I'm comfortable with the same cohort of people choosing to interpret what I've written in the most incharitable way possible. Maybe take what I've said at face value next time and when I've said what the meaning of my post was accept that's what the meaning was.

No I wasn't.

Because the person dpibg it would have been attempting to use the attack on the synagogue as justification for the attack when there is none. Truly bizarre but quite telling that you'd think I'd support burning down a mosque in other circumstances.

What a bizarre response.

Worth pointing out -again - that a call for a decent striker with a history of success in English football is not something that has changed in hindsight. Many saints fans were calling for this as the key position all summer. Despite doing some decent business elsewhere, this is ultimately going to cost us and it's on the board for failing to address that.

Yep. Should be looking for five wins really which let's be honest isn't going to happen.

Awful. Anyone committing crimes like this in response to other atrocities need removing from society.

I think we cross that bridge when we know for certain that Trump isn't going to do anything in response if Israel decide to blow the agreement up. First thing is to secure agreement from the Palestinians, get the withdrawal started and release all the hostages. Once that's done there should be immense pressure on reducing the remaining capabilities of Hamas and once we have that much of the justification for Israel continuing and remaining sympathy from the international community won't be there in my opinion. That's the moment for severe pressure on Israel and hopefully chiefly from America.

If we get full agreement from the Palestinian side and it's only Israel holding things up then it will be clear where the problem lies. He's famously unpredictable but I don't think Trump is going to stand for Israel messing things up and preventing his Nobel peace prize. Israel knows who has the power in their relationship.