-
Posts
41,256 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
To be honest I'd probably take a point a game which would keep us above the relegation zone and out of trouble. Five points minimum please but we can achieve more.
-
I think if he's honest with himself soggy knows exactly what it's about but chooses not to understand because he would believe it conflicts with his "side".
-
And also because being woke is not about simply being worried about sexism, racism and climate change. It's a mischaracterisation.
-
Shite.
-
Walcott since he came on and Diallo have done impressions of footballers during the game. Grim.
-
Sounds like quite an unpleasant character tbh.
-
They'll announce it in January just to spite me.
-
Terrorist Attacks - WARNING: CONTAINS DISTRESSING IMAGES
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Think I read earlier today that some organisations are under investigation for encouraging people to convert to Christianity in order to approve their chances of being able to stay... -
If you remember I said similar last year and then it didn't happen so I don't have a great track record with takeovers. I know all about the kits though!
-
They've been right before on some things and then some things they've said haven't happened but that could have been because situations change. Will be interesting to see if right though.
-
I've heard more rumours again of an American takeover. Some people saying we will hear news before the end of the year. No idea about it so don't ask!
-
Isn't that what the nations league is for?
-
TBF Liechtenstein seem to have improved.
-
I haven't "failed" I'm just not going trawling through the forum without a search function in order to find posts that I and others have confirmed existed at the time in order to prove something to some bloke on the Internet that's trying to goad me into wasting my time. Believe what you want, it's clear from multiple posters now that it happened and its likely to happen again with future signings. It's OK to be wrong. Go and enjoy your Sunday.
-
When you've got three or four posters telling you that's exactly how it was, I'd suggest you may want to consider the possibility that you are wrong...
-
Of course it is possible but the risk we took was that we'd get relegated whilst waiting for some of these players to get to the required standard. Fair play to the club they've got a bit of stability this year and we have improved but it's early days yet.
-
I don't need to prove you wrong and as this forum no longer has a search facility I wouldn't be able to trawl through past posts even if I wanted to. What I posted is true because I made reference to it at the time as it's not the first time it's happened. Plenty of posters get annoyed at other posters if they dare to suggest that a signing might not be the best option we could have made. I see I'm not the only poster who remembers exactly what was said.
-
Plenty of posters on here accused myself and others of writing him off when we said he was an underwhelming signing and that the evidence didn't look promising that he would be the first choice starter we needed.
-
And again, saying you are underwhelmed at a signing or pointing to them potentially not being very good based on their previous record and fan reports is not writing someone off. I'm not sure why that's difficult for some posters on here to grasp. Some signings will seem underwhelming and be terrible like Carillo, some will be much better than expected like Pelle, Mane and possibly Lyanco.
-
It happens with every signing that isn't received with universal positivity. I'm not sure why it needs to be said but every single signing we make has the pote tial to be amazing but that doesn't mean you can't give an opinion about the signing prior to the performance. It's odd.
-
Or maybe they were commenting on the previous reports on the player like every signing we have ever made? Absolutely bizarre that some seem to think you can't have an initial impression of a signing prior to playing for us.
-
And TBF I never claimed it was unreasonable, simply that that isn't what kraken was saying. Kraken makes a good point about the value of self resilience and I completely agree that there's a real value in it. Professional help or talking about feelings is not the only solution and should not be viewed as a magic bullet for the reasons already discussed in this thread. Just worth emphasising that.
-
Because kraken didn't say don't seek professional help if you have suicidal thoughts. He made an interesting point about dealing with any issues he has and the point he has made has been misinterpreted. Unfortunate that you're trying to derail the thread which had been quite a good discussion up until this point. Maybe take some of your own advice.
-
Why are you talking about suicidal thoughts? Kraken didn't mention that.
-
I could understand that. There's a line of thinking where you could just lock them in a cage and let them go at it as long as they're consenting and not hurting others.