hypochondriac

Yes but most prem strikers would do that. Given his age and the presumably large wages he would command even with a pay cut, there are better options.

I'd have him if we didn't have ings but we have enough meh strikers.

I notice you reply to me an awful lot. The same could be said of you.

Do you reckon he goes searching through the forum archives for them? Anything to appear superior.

I would have taken a point before the game. It's a shame to concede in that fashion but I'm happy we got that last point to make it certain that we won't be going down. Would be nice to finish with 44 or more.

And Brighton would have to get 4 points from 3 games. Isn't going to happen.

Is it controversial to say JWP has reverted to type the last few games after an uncharacteristic bit of good form?

Good point.

If suicide bombing was a shortcut to paradise, the person convincing people of that would have already killed themselves

We could have lost to wolves and won this one which would have been more expected and the result would have been the same.

He's too good for a club in their position. He shoukd move and challenge himself.

Do you have any proof that this new evidence was bought and orchestrated? It's interesting that you were adament initially that the original judgement was sound and yet now you're very keen to question the validity now that that has been overturned. Why is that? Oh and I'm sure a prosecution would be dying to have you on a jury. If the defendent is white and male then you'll be pushing to convict every time before you've even seen the evidence!

Light brown?

You know soggy has backed himself into a corner when he comes out with paragraphs worth of copy and pasted drivel trying to rerun the trial on a messageboard.

It's not ridiculous at all. I don't know if any of them will be any good, but teams buy individual players from relegated teams all the time and they are often bargains. I'd take a few of Fulham's players for definite.

You'd probably learn a lot from boning Yoshida.

It's scary to think that people with the mindset of soggy potentially had even a small influence over court decisions.

1 more poibt will see us safe for sure. That would mean both Brighton probably needing 5 points and Cardiff needing 7 which isn't going to happen.

And note that once again he makes these totally unsubstantiated claims without being able to provide a scintilla of evidence. He's a disgrace.

The allegations are from victims of IS. Personally I'd be more inclined to believe victims of the terrorist regime than someone who ran off to support them and its now in her interest to play down her involvement in it. It's really really odd that you'd prefer to side with the terrorist in order to suit your twisted ideology.

Whenever he inevitably loses an argument, his response is to make up claims about what someone else has said in the hope that no one will notice. Fails every time.

He clearly has an ingrained prejudice against them. As you say its very strange.

Questioning the original verdict based on the facts of the case does not equal "supporting" Ched Evan's actions. It is possible to be critical of the man's actions whilst being glad that justice seems to have been served and that he has been found innocent of a crime that there was not enough evidence to say beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed.

It's a damn shame to be honest considering the Sunday paper revelations but I suppose you could argue that even the worst people in the world deserve legal representation. Its not easy to swallow though.

So now that we can be pretty sure that she was not "just a housewife" presumably your opinion will have changed? Or will you be sticking doggedly to your position regardless of the facts as per usual?