hypochondriac

How many of our shots have gone miles over the bar this year? So frustrating...

And wanyama likely off. I know he hasn't been great recently but I still think we will miss him when he goes. We are going to be left with a team full of cloggers and ineffective players.

I don't think it's much to do with koeman, it's a lot to do with the personnel we have left. Morgan is a huge loss that we haven't recovered from and we don't have enough pace to scare any teams. We've tried a few things now and most of the games recently have been depressingly similar and boring.

I've been bored to tears with most of our performances lately. We were spoilt last year

Might generate some atmosphere tbf.

Hi soggy, I notice you are doing that thing again where you ignore all the posts that ask you for evidence to substantiate your claims. You must admit that it is no surprise that you get ridiculed for doing this and then denying that that is what you have done.

Glossing over some of the objections I have to your statement that Trump is correct, from a logistical point of view how is this Muslim ban going to work?

Many said it at the time...

And as if by magic! How incredibly predictable. And then he has the nerve to ask guan (again!) the posts where he made things up? Which poster used stats to show that all Muslims are a threat soggy?

I'd actually have some respect for soggy if he simply admitted that a few of his comments were a bit rash. He rushed in with both feet and made some unsubstantiated claims which he has thus far failed to find any evidence for. What he will do though is claim he has already answered it (but provide no evidence of this) or ignore the questions entirely. It's very weaselly and is why he has been mocked by quite a few now (my "buddies" apparently )

Which poster used stats to show that all Muslims are a threat?

Unfortunately you will never get the same accolade. The vast majority of your posts are the ravings of a fantasist.

Is that a new function then? I'm pretty sure you have to click on the post in order to read it. If you have someone on ignore then why bring it up so much? It's very attention seeking and troll-like. Seems a bit pointless to stick me on ignore if you read all my posts anyway but whatever floats your boat I suppose. Also you are a liar and I have called you it many times because that is exactly what you are. I denied calling you a liar in one post because I hadn't called you a liar when you said I had (but I had many times previously because you have made things up routinely on this thread alone.) it's hilarious how many people have called you out and you have simply ignored them or brushed it off and then you say people have sussed ME out? Have a look in the mirror love. Go and squinny on your other forum or pretend you have blocked me again. I love that.

You would prefer it but that isn't what you are. You can add deluded to the list too clearly.

Totally agree with you. Good post for once Tim.

Ah so it's just pedantry then. Gotcha.

It's much better in my opinion to let people we don't agree with speak and then defeat them with argument. It's why it's so frustrating when the likes of nick griffin are invited onto question time and then shouted down the entire time so he can slink off and say it's a media conspiracy.

Pretty much spree with all of that whelk. Good post. I think it's fair to say I can be hard hearted on here though I don't think that translates to offline. I've always tried to look at the other point of view from the generally accepted opinion. It's why I'm interesting in listening to the likes of tyson fury rather than silencing him or signing a useless petition.

Well seeing as you responded to Verbal's eloquent post with ridicule, I wouldn't hold out much hope for a proper debate considering that's how you respond to someone whose intelligence clearly surpasses your own.

Hold on, the vast majority of people on this thread have thanked verbal for his input. Turkish wrote a non serious reply (standard) and shurlock replied to verbal, otherwise no one else mentioned him other than CB Fry who was complimentary. Whether his last post is all relevant is arguable but he's still a very intelligent individual with a lot of interesting bits to offer. But you can pretend that there's a pack of people on here ready to pounce on anyone who writes anything too intelligent if it suits your narrative.

Well the fact that you continue to try to debate in this topic despite blocking those you disagree with and despite being embarrassed frequently suggests you are very troll like.

So you are saying that if someone like tyson fury decided to agree with some commonly held Islamic views (without naming them as such) there would not be a different reaction? Be serious.

Trump is a nutter but he's also pretty much on the opposite end of the spectrum to yourself. In my opinion some of your comments are just as misguided and dangerous as anything Trump says.

Hold on, I thought you have me on ignore? You keep contradicting yourself!

Thank goodness you put me on ignore soggy. What a shame that's the third time you've brought it up (discounting the one time you forgot and replied to me and those times you've spoken about me on pap's website.)