hypochondriac

If someone makes moronic comments then it's an accurate assumption.

Couldn't agree more. They will insist it's all a big media conspiracy and the sheeple won't accept what is best for them when the inevitable happens and they lose the next election (if it gets that far.)

But you don't debate. As whelk has pointed out, you invent extremes of an argument and then post the counter to it as if someone has said it when they never had. You did it in your previous reply to whelk after he had picked you up in that very post for doing it! That isn't debate, it's just talking with yourself for the sake of it.

No idea. I don't think there is anything wrong with having a dig at you if your answers warrant it. You keep asking questions that no one on here has asked in order to continue a conversation of your own making. It's odd.

Didn't realise you were king of the forum.

Not sure what that means or how seeing how something pans out makes mass sexual assault as well as rape any less abhorrent.

I see little resemblance between some drunken behaviour from the 70s and reportedly 1000 people serially assaulting and raping girls no matter how you try to downplay it. I'm sure the rape victim is not going to be of the opinion that had she lived a few decades ago she could have just given the blokes a slap and that would have been the end of the matter. Bizarre thing to try and excuse this disgusting type of behaviour.

And the reported rape?

trust you to be confused by it. He is clearly referring to alpine....

So why bother even asking the question in your post then if no one actually believed or said that?

And absolutely no one said they were. Why are you again putting words into people's mouths? Equating potential racism on a chat room with rape is disgusting and he clearly has his priorities wrong whoever that German official is.

It doesn't fit with his agenda as an apologist so he won't bother.

You could always just stop posting idiocy you know?

are you seriously trying to pretend you have put me on ignore again? Do yourself a favour and either stick me on ignore and be done with it or stop the charade. This on again off again attention seeking rubbish from yourself just makes you look foolish.

Good effort Guan. It's a fair summary of why soggy has now devolved into a troll. About six or seven posters have now attempted to engage with him and then given up and expressed their frustration yet he carried on regardless.

Yes you did! You've been manufacturing your own arguments with yourself. It's the definition of derailing.

You could apply that to a load of posters you respond to. You appear confused an awful lot of the time.

That's pretty much what he has done throughout the entire thread.

Wrong again. I made the definition after you proudly claimed you had me on ignore. You can go and check if you like. You claimed that Katie Hopkins was a Christian because she compared herself to christ and celebrated Christmas. Again you can go and check if you like as you tend to forget what you have said. The celebrate the birth of christ bit is something you have now added because you clearly realised the mistake you made. I would agree that celebrating the birth of christ is probably an indication that you have some Christian beliefs but doesn't in itself mean you are a Christian. As usual you are forgetting what you said and then claiming everyone else is confused about it. Most of what you wrote had no relevance to the topic in this thread but that's par for the course with you.

Hallelujah. You're learning.

Just watched a show on BBC about Muslim attitudes to homosexuality in Britain. Absolutely shocking and disgusting attitudes from some.

Thomas Partey is having a party...

You realise he was being sarcastic? I think it's important to recognise here the actual asylum seekers who are running for their lives. It's a really damming situation now and was largely caused by not processing those coming in correctly and letting everyone in who showed up claiming to be a refugee from Syria. Many more checks should have been made and efforts to welcome genuine cases whilst sending back he rest. This problem is because of that.

Hold on a second, how do you know my definition of a Christian? You supposedly had me on ignore when I wrote that. Strange. Anyway my definition is pretty much a standard one, I've just checked an online definition and it's very similar to what I wrote initially. Once again you show a woeful lack of understanding regarding faith. Being a Christian in the vast majority of people's eyes is a fair bit more than simply celebrating the birth of Jesus once a year. I could call myself a Muslim and decide to fast once a year but it doesn't automatically make it so. So as normal you seem very confused again. Also not sure what any of that has to do with what verbal wrote, but then you do like to shoot off on a tangent every so often.

You've made me doubt the whole of AD's editorial content now. I'll never read them again.