hypochondriac

It appears to be only yourself and soggy who are feigning ignorance. Well I say feigning, I assume you are but it's probable that soggy has no idea what's going on. What has any of what you posted above got to do with your claims that people have been saying that Islam has the potential to be as violent as Christianity. Clearly they have the potential to be as violent as each other but Islam has a much greater problem with violence at the current time. It's been repeated on here a whole bunch of times now, I'm surprised that you sound so confused.

Who has ever said that? You just completely made it up!

Exactly this. Soggy isn't too good with nuance though so it doesn't surprise me he struggles with this line of thinking.

I certainly think it's more relatable considering it is basically our own lifestyle and France are our neighbours.

Nope. We were talking about the fact that Islam has a greater problem with violence and terrorism at the present time than other world religions. You for some reason decided to go off on a tangent as you usually do about historical violence in Christianity. Even a number of Muslims agree that it is a problem within their religion. Odd that you- I presume a non Muslim - would disagree with them.

Because of course it would be disgusting if someone profited from the terrorism. That doesn't change any objections I had about your post and the fact you had to write it in the first place.

Comment from their forum: Very few people thrive under intense pressure. Portsmouth FC and its supporters ramp it up beyond that.

I didn't consider it to be reasonable yesterday.

I'm not sure I agree with that. Isis want to grow their state and probably one of the best ways of doing this is to keep terrorising the west. I doubt they hate the west any more than everyone else who they seem to hate too, it's just that they get more pr from doing stuff here.

Or because I couldn't be bothered to have another pointless debate with you? Guan has already pointed out exactly what was wrong with it. Read his posts if you want a reason.

Well it's not garbage. I've sat there every season when I've been allowed to and it's never hit the heights of our seasons in the championship. Your experience may well be different but I can't see how you can call my opinion utter garbage unless you are sat next to me?

To be honest you've worn me down with it all. It seemed pointless to tackle another one of your posts so I'm glad someone else did it (and much better than I could have done.)

Tbf on cup games it is awful. It used to be a lot better a few seasons back but then they closed the blocks near to the away fans and they lost all the regulars who sat there and the atmosphere has never recovered. I remember a season in the championship when we sang oh when the saints for the entirety of the second half.

It's a perfect deconstruction of your post. It highlights your pomposity and how your posts read nicely but are in reality overly verbose and light on any meaningful contributions. It was great.

When was the last time they carried out terror attacks in the name of Christianity on such a scale?

If you're a simpleton yes.

It did with Venus albeit they were female.

Of course but we have no proof that happened.

I'd like to know what incitement to commit disorder means as well. That sounds worryingly vague. Are we talking about ****** signs aimed in the direction of the opposition?

Indeed. (Soggy is a liar though.)

Just received a letter from the club about disorder in the Itchen North. Has anyone else received something similar?

What are you wittering on about now? I never denied calling you a liar, but I never referred to you nor called you any names in post 780. You were the one who responded and started bringing your earlier misdeeds in this thread up.

I don't see why inventing a fictional scenario makes the image any less important as a tool to show the reality of this atrocity. It's impossible to know how I would react if it were a family member but I would like to think that I would think in a very similar way unless the image was being shared to be ridiculed or to support the actions of the terrorists. As this is very clearly not the case here then I personally see no problem with it. I note you made no attempt to address any of my other points? I didn't accuse you of saying that, like your pompous friend Chapel End Charlie says, I was using hyperbole to make a point. I called you a liar because you asked for examples about where you had lied on this thread. I pointed one out to you and asked you to show proof of the claim you made in the form of a post and you have still failed to do so. You later claimed that you had already answered it but failed to show any post where you had done so, thus the only conclusion that can be drawn from that exchange is that you were inventing claims and lying and once you realised your error you ignored the very reasonable requests for evidence in the hope that no one would call you out on it. So the claims of being a liar are very valid. Unless you can show me a post to refute that claim?

Mane will be off, most likely in the summer. We may be able to keep Tadic and definitely Forster presuming he returns from injury OK.

I did respond. Unlike you I don't refuse to respond to things and then claim I have. I didn't see how it was relevant to the discussion. It was a powerful picture that shows very quickly the scale of the atrocity. I'm glad that Guan posted it because it shows what these monsters are like and why we cannot sit down and have tea with IS.