What I don't understand is aluko and others were all saying before the tournament how we shouldn't compare it to the men's game and how it's a sport in its own right, and then the first words out of the coaches mouth is to compare their achievement to male teams of the past. Either you want to be seen as separate or you don't. It's confusing.
Why should we comment on anything if that's your attitude? And why are you lumping me in with alpine? All I said was I wouldn't be that happy with 12.5 million, a view shared by many. It's irrelevant though as supposedly it hasn't been agreed yet so it appears that the club agrees with me.
No there isn't. I wasn't attaching any blame to anyone, just making an observation. If we lose Morgan, Clyne and Toby, it is going to be tough to replicate what we did last year and still come out with similar performances.
Because only someone who has never been to England would ask a question like this, or use football manager to analyse wages for players or wholeheartedly support the Rooney rule for football imo.
I really don't care what anyone's religious beliefs are to be honest. It's entirely a personal matter. My own experience however is that those who attend church regularly that I know of are also normally top blokes. Might be a coincidence but I think having a religion can definitely be a positive thing for some people. As I said though it's a personal choice and I certainly wouldn't judge someone for being an atheist.
I called him a w*nker because he referred to my comment as gratuitously pro religion which it obviously wasn't. Not even a little bit. It's pretty sad that a thread about what a decent bloke Vic is has descended into this. Would be nice if the last page and a bit was deleted.
Come on its bloody ridiculous. I made a throwaway comment that he goes to church a lot and is a great bloke and it gets immediately pounced upon by the militant atheists. Bunch of mentalists you must agree surely?