hypochondriac

If I were going to listen to anyone's mock outrage it would most certainly not be you considering previous comments you have made and the lack of judgement and intellect you have demonstrated time and time again. Your main problem once again is a lack of understanding. This time it is regarding criticism of the media and it's coverage which isn't the same as criticising the families of those involved in the tragedy. The only thing appaling around here is when you try to use autism to point score and then pretend you didn't.

Those were the words of a relative of one of the deceased.

Thanks but I don't need a lecture about being callous from someone who uses autism for point scoring and who thinks the McCanns murdered their child and covered it up.

I'm not being "hard", I'm expressing an opinion that you don't like. By all means the families and the city of Liverpool are allowed to celebrate this and mourn the dead again but excuse me if I find the constant coverage tiresome. It's a tragedy just like many other tragic events that happened when I wasn't really old enough to appreciate it. I hope those directly affected have a degree of closure and I agree with whelk that it should absolutely not be ignored completely in the murdoch press but neither should it be analysed from every conceivable angle such as asking passers by on the street for their opinion. I'm fully prepared for the abuse or the incredulous posts because that's the easy response rather than engaging your brain and thinking about it. Thanks to those who can discuss it sensibly.

Nothing wrong with them going over it and celebrating it again and I never said they couldn't, I just don't want it cutting away from the radio programme I'm listening to literally ever ten minutes to go and interview passers by on the street about it or random celebrities. I've expressed this sentiment before but it's like when a celebrity dies and you can't escape it. It's been on every online news outlet multiple times with analysis from every angle and poring over it in minute detail and the only thing it accomplishes is that it lessens the impact of it and get people annoyed to the point that they become particularly nasty men as you put it.

Very much so when I'm trying to listen to something interesting on the radio and they keep cutting away every five minutes to report on it again. It's a tragic occurence but the court case isn't going to bring them back and going over and over the same things including asking passers by on the street achieves nothing. I don't blame the victims but I do blame the media. All it does is have the opposite effect of what is intended- to lessen the impact of these sort of things and report upon it with such frequency that many people stop caring. *stands back and waits for the next poster to run in screaming abuse.

You're clearly some sort of Liverpool fan. I get you're passionate about this issue but you really need to calm down just because someone has the view that fans had a portion of the blame too. It's a tragedy whoever is to blame but I can't be the only one bored by the interminable coverage of it all.

For someone who apparently worked for the courts that's a woeful lack of understanding.

I'll be pleased that justice has been done but still dislike ched Evans due to his actions. Like any normal person

I don't support Ched Evans, I do think that there was more to this case then meets the eye and it appears that the appeal judges agree. According to you that opinion amounts to being a rape apologist[emoji38]

We don't buy talent we breed it (unless the players we breed are pants and then we buy it but keep quiet about it.)

I suppose looking to the future you have the likes of French and Saunders and Ruby wax maybe?

Financial gain is clearly a motivation for a book like this, as is a book suggesting they did it. He wan't going to sell many copies by saying the opposite.

You have a history of inventing things people have said as well as seeing racism and islamaphobia in everything. Why should anyone believe you are suddenly dong jokes now rather than just making your usual ill thought out and inadvisable comments.

The year of high profile deaths.

Are you seriously trying to suggest that verbal of all people is an islamaphobe? Have you read any of his previous posts? You're utterly barmy. And why are you doing that thing you always do by stating the obvious that no one has actually said? Who has said they have been 100% honest? Who has said they have been completely squeaky clean?

Are you really that hard of thinking? http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?37804-the-McCanns&p=2327305#post2327305

It's pretty tiresome when I have to poit out something you have said incorrectly (again) because you can't seem to comprehend what you have written just this morning: Please point out where CB Fry (or anyone for that matter) has said they think the McCanns are squeaky clean?

Exactly. In soggy's world, questioning the idea that the McCanns killed their child and then disposed of the body means that you therefore think they were squeaky clean and completely honest. Odd mindset but expect from him.

So anyone who finds some of your allegations distasteful suddenly thinks the McCanns are squeaky clean? And you have a go at others for being too black and white...

"div" that's another word for disabled people. Classy.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36090188 Read this article and then try to argue that we'd be better off embroiled in all this. It's absurd.

Shows up some the experts in the media and on here who were screaming rape apologist at those who looked at the details of this case and thought there was a reasonable chance that he didn't do it. Evidently the appeal judges agree.

Agree with that seems slightly bizarre but I suppose they want them to rule on this new evidence.

Ched wins his appeal and will face a new trial