hypochondriac

How much do they typically charge?

Of course not but bit pointless giving him a prison sentence for it I would have thought. The re-education course was probably the corset course of action.

I would hope he feels he owes us at least a year considering the rehabilitation. Wouldn't surprise me if not though.

The nature of this thing means that it is impossible to predict with absolute certainty what will happen but that doesn't necessarily make the status quo the preferable option.

According to some posters on here, it's like the wild west on some Friday nights in England so it wouldn't surprise me.

Targett has put in some great crosses recently though.

Well there hasn't been a total ban on all Muslims and neither will there be thankfully. Banning everyone of a certain religion whilst impossible is also the logic of a child. Extremist Muslims are disgusting and a blight on society but calling for a ban on every Muslim is idiotic.

Bit of a silly article really. Academies go through stages and even when we got some gems there were other years when we didn't produce much. We aren't going to produce world beaters every single season and we never have done.

No. No he is not. Who is "this lot" by the way?

Fair comment.

He only said that because he didn't want to upset the unions.

His point about united stands though, win percentages without context are meaningless and many people believe burley was shyte (for us just before you go off on one again) because he hugely underachieved with the resources at his disposal, scraping us into the playoffs at the last second and playing poorly for the most part with a load of players out of position. You may disagree with that point of view but it doesn't make it wrong, it's just a differing of opinion.

Why are you blindly quoting win percentages with no context? How is any of that relevant without talking about the circumstances surrounding them?

Do you play football sue?

I'm not part of any leaver campaign, I only decided to vote to leave this week and before that I was undecided. A number of articles and opinion pieces have bemoaned the fact that the general public haven't got many facts to go on here and that people are already fed up with the scaremongering on both sides.

Win percentages with no context don't have much to do with how good a manager has been. Pearson for example didn't have a great win percentage but did well under the circumstances.

If we vote to stay there won't be another referendum in the foreseeable future. It took over thirty years to have this one despite there being a desire to have one for years and look how the eu has changed over that time.

They won't go away but as far as the eu are concerned they will

The whole referendum was a calculated political risk by Dave to shut up the eurosceptics in his party. The likelihood is that despite many doubts, the majority will ultimately be scared into voting to remain and go with what they know and that will be justification for the eu to push onwards with their project and never have to put that sort of thing to the British people again.

How is that evidence to say that they will never be admitted? Could easily be admitted in a decade or two.

Pure speculation on your part and no evidence to back up what you say.

Not to mention turkey or whoever else they decide to admit in the future.

Why is it not right? I would suggest it's because Trump is currently box office and of interest to the readership. They have also had other articles about what the other candidates stand for. It's not an election in this country so I think it's OK.

It is a bit weird that corbyn is effectively anonymous over the whole Europe issue.

Hero?