NickG

do think too much is made of this plan B stuff. Don't mean this as a defence of Jan as clearly team are not doing well enough but when we played poorly but 4-4-2 we didn't moan about plan B, we moaned that players were not good enough, not doing their jobs, not motivated etc -think those are the real issues not 4-4-2 v 4-2-3-1 or whatever

sorry to offend you with thread with football info and not slagging off a saints fan

amongst other things Dyer returning http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11129

difficult for us on the outside with so much spin from both sides; if it has reduced lowe will claim it as a success if it hasn't he will say it would have been even worse and just shows how much we were going in wrong direction etc Sure Crouch would argue that if it has reduced its due to things he had in place or it wasn't that bad if it hasn't he will say Lowe's a failure!:confused:

Lowe was more unpopular last time IMO, but only went (after a fight) when someone put their money where their mouth is and forced him out. Can only see him leaving in similar circumstances again.

Does Chorley go to games? http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11126

thought it was me being slow thinking it didn't quite work!

was training with Bournemouth.

and Happy Christmas to you Saint1977!

was on radio solent and hampshire at weekend

same as we did when he appointed Dodd! They are all pretty much as bad as each other

true -but the same token, the reason for the low crowds is due to the football and opposition not due to who is in the box (of course there is the valid point that the board impact where we are now)

.....

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11122

What people such as Alpine don't understand is that just because you do not want the board to continue to swap awound every few weeks and don't want administration doesn't mean you love Lowe. It wouldn't take much for someone to get the fans united behind them in an effort to overthrow lowe -but there is no-one mounting that campaign, so its not lowe luvvies just people who would rather a club, not in administration even if it is with Lowe still at the helm. People get uptight when asked who is the alternative, but who is? A respected businessman (Salz?) with backing? yes please. the various tyrekickers we have seen over the last couple of year? think would stick with Lowe. Advertise for a new Chairman -possibly -if we can fund a decent non-shareholder, but who is going to select them -the shareholders led by Lowe.

plc -available for sale -anyone really interested can buy us anf oust Lowe. (been done before!)

don't think, maybe wrong, there is a post on here defending Lowe, (which is why the lowe luvvie retorts are pathetic) what people are disagreeing with is that administration is a sound move - its not.

this forum would be better without the name calling and labelling. I was making the point, probably too sarcastically, that you resort to such labels when a point is put that you disagree with

exactly the point I was making.

alpine -you are not a contingent, you are a one off!

stop trying to scare people with reason just to protect your messiah you luvvie!

think committed to buying Gasmi? Think he may turn out to be ok.

first accurate post from you in a long time;)

he assured us as soon as GB went it would improve -he was wrong!

Hope this answers all.