
NickG
Members-
Posts
14,535 -
Joined
Everything posted by NickG
-
sorry I think you have got that wrong. DMG showed a high work rate, good movement and some nice touches -throughout the game. Cracking shot as you mention and good finish for the goal. This thread is about yesterdays game and DMG showed all the things he had been lacking. Whether he can keep it going and be consistent who knows, but firmly believe you are wrong about yesterday and he had a suprisingly good game
-
none of those were big names when we signed them.
-
did what?
-
it gets a bit difficult! At the moment its half a protest, we want lowe out and then...er...we don't know
-
how did you feel a few weeks ago when the rumour was that we were cashing in on him, making a profit?
-
sounds more enjoyable way to spend £30!
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
lol and probably more honest than some! -
like most who went I am glad I went and now looking forward to next home league game
-
all those are commented on in other threads, this is post match -and we played pretty well
-
of course something he says will be right, some of the time but mostly clueless. don't have a problem with different views but not skate like baiting
-
don't expect reasoned arguement, it goes his view (with nothing to back it up) reasoned response from someone else then calling the poster commenting on what they saw deluded/lowe luvvie/unrealistic/happy clappy etc just a saddo who likes attention and fails at discussion.
-
only someone with such a flawed personality could make happy sound like an insult!
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
read the thread. fool -
phil Don't think anyone is saying that they prefer nice football to wins, or that its ok forget the result we played ok, the point made today is that we did play pretty well. This is match reaction, we all know this season is poor but today, we did ok. If (big if) it wasn't for whats gone before this would be good result as well -against Reading. Good spirit, players worked very hard - including McG, good atmosphere and entertaining game.
-
it appears we did all enjoy it thanks
-
good post. Think Pearce only out due to it being Reading, wasn't he? Most teams are happy with point away from home hence sit back, leaving our quite skillful midfield to play around but without decent forward play to break them down -Reading wanted a win -actually suited us as you say
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
agree but would probably give them all a seige mentality and bond them tighter! -
he is on wind up, unfortunately like others I bite at times but just ignore him.
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
and 32% on here still won't boycott, would need a huge swing in public opinion to make it even noticeable, suggest forget it and save up for shares! -
post match thread!
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
no getting rid of Lowe / Crouch and Wilde would be very positive, but a campaign without either mass support or success would be negative. Appreciate you feel it would get support but just think you are miles away from what would happen at the moment. But how will it succeed? Lowe won't step down and as I have posted above don't believe major shareholders will be influenced. -
it is if you follow football on ceefax. Results are the main thing but today was a decent performance and enjoyable afternoon
-
enjoyed it today. Worth going
-
Would you BOYCOTT? Ways to get rid of Lowe and the board
NickG replied to Wes Tender's topic in The Saints
1) I would be very surprised if there was support for mass boycott 2) those who went today probably quite enjoyed it 3) didn't hear anything negative about board/club in ground -think there would be at least some anti-lowe songs before boycott considered 4) as posted earlier don't think there is any logic to it having any effect what so ever and may have negative effect to what you seek