derry

Maybe we should send him 'Inverting the pyramid' so he can see there is more than two ways to play.

No it isn't. I've seen every game at SMS this season and in most of them we have been hoofing it up at Lambert. It's the way Pardew sets the team up to play with the wide midfielders tucked in and no natural left sided player.

Starting from Cortese's comments, unless Pardew provides a team that shows it can win the league next season, with both it's general play, tactics and results then the end of the season is the time to change. Certainly not halfway through next season when it isn't working. The club have provided tremendous financial support in the transfer market but that is only the half of it. The management have to demonstrate that they can make a genuine title winning team out of these players. That hasn't happened yet.

Merrington and the other football reporters on here all said that the touchlines were ok. I saw a short tv cameo and the centre looked awful but the wide areas looked ok.

Certainly not to be tucked in and boot the ball up to Lambert.

Rooney is scoring nearly all his goals inside the six yd area, 7 out of the last 8 from headers most of them from byeline crosses. They are for me the best footballing team in the country.

Alex Ferguson.

Steve, can HMRC if they believe the administration to be inappropriate challenge in a higher court, ie injunction pending a hearing.

Alan Pardew doesn't need any help, unless he produces a consistent run of convincing results by the end of the season, which convinces Cortese that we will win the league next year, he will be a goner. I hope for his sake he sorts this team and proves that many on here are correct in having confidence in him.

Chez, saintpat and shurlock all were at the game as was Merrington. Merrington made the same point that the centre of the pitch was poor but we should play out on the touchlines. Pardew has a fundamental problem. He doesn't understand that if we tuck in, play players in the wide positions that come inside on their good foot (although Puncheon looks two footed) and default to 15 yds inside the touchline we can't play the ball around. Once the central midfielders/defenders get the ball, if there isn't an immediate touchline outlet on both sides, it is going to either get booted up field or passed back then booted up field. I defy anybody to try and tell me that isn't the way we play most of our games. Unless we play players on their natural side and they have the necessary pace to go outside and fundamentally want to go outside, we are not going to be a decent footballing team. Cluttering up the centre of the pitch is negative, leads to hoofball and on poor pitches neuters us. If Pardew doesn't sort that out he isn't going to be allowed the time to be manager next year. At the moment there is no evidence that he can do this. One off spikes and loads of draws don't cut it. It is my opinion that if there isn't overwhelming evidence that we can win this league by a mile next season he will be gone at the end of the season.

We took the gun out of the Typhoon, initially put in concrete ballast which didn't work, so we put the gun back in but can't use it as there is no fire control system. Chinooks for special forces bought new but incompatible systems mean they have never been used. You couldn't make it up.

Or more. They apparently have to have the CVA and and if not accept any imposed penalties before they get the licence to play. It happened to us even though we didn't need a CVA.

The FA could pay the football creditors as they did with the tv money in January. There is about another £12m due in transfer payments. I wouldn't bet against Pompey getting nothing this year.

I knew that but I'm not sure about the legal position. The CVA, if there is one, looks after the creditors. The football debts have to be 100% settled or there is no licence plus all the malarkey of points deductions etc. The FL are no pushover and turned Fry over. This is going to run and run.

So who by law has the administrator to protect, the shareholders or the creditors. The CVA, football debts and the licence could be a real mess.

This is going to be interesting Chanrai's spokesman says he is going to fund the club whilst in administration and pay the administration costs out of his own pocket. Hope he's got deep pockets.

SFC had a massive advantage last year as the club continued to trade out of administration as it was SLH in administration not the club, therefore any money paid to the club was outside the administration. PCFC will be in administration, therefore any intention to pay in money for specific creditors can't happen.

The administrator won't be able to favour one creditor to the detriment of the remainder.

He might pay it but he won't have any influence after administration. The money he pays in,, will go in the administrators pot not to HMRC and will be used for all creditors not just to pay one.

Increasing by at least £1.5m per month.

5 calender days Ron, or 5 working days which would be Tuesday.

Could the judge still hold the court hearing on monday as the notice was today, so needs 5 (presumably) working days before an administrator can be appointed, ie Tuesday so I presume they won't be in administration on Monday.

Just having a look at CVA figures, 75% approval, HMRC debt now about £18m in total plus £8m in july makes £26m ish which means unless the debt is over £100m they can block any CVA. It is safe to assume that the salaries alone will take care of the income. The FA receive the Sky money and will pay that direct to the clubs owed about £12m at the end of the season, so how are they going to make this work as most of the best players are loans. We know how difficult it is to get high earners off the payroll. Paying them off won't be an option and the football debts have to be paid in full. I'd be interested to know if a notice of administration trumps an ajourned court hearing.

Insignia, not pub, and he's not picking me up, just interested.

Which one?