Jump to content

Jimmy_D

Moderators
  • Posts

    6,635
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jimmy_D

  1. Roman Abramovich gives trustees Chelsea 'stewardship' - BBC Sport
  2. Wow, extremely lucky to get away with that.
  3. Hm, I think that actually should be a penalty. Ridiculous, I don't know what he was thinking.
  4. What was that defending?
  5. Burnley and Watford both managing to squeeze out a point today, I’d be surprised if Everton don’t drop into the relegation zone with the run of fixtures they’ve got. A lot will come down to how they react to that.
  6. I had Burnley as relegation certs a few weeks ago, looking pretty unlikely now to me.
  7. As I say that... Son and Kane breaking the record for combining for goals is mightily impressive, especially as it’s not at one of the clubs regularly competing for the title.
  8. This should be about 5-3 this half alone. Shocking finishing on display.
  9. Leeds right in it now, bad luck on top of leaking goals that badly...
  10. It’s not just Chelsea. The funds behind Everton seem to be in danger of being affected by sanctions. Also to a lesser extent Newcastle, that’s probably just down to PIF having a wide portfolio of investments, something was probably going to be hit.
  11. Shots blocked by defenders don’t go in either.
  12. Two great goals for different reasons. Adams reacting extremely quickly in the way he did to take that chance, and Romeu with one of the cleanest and sweetest hits of a football you'll see all season. Romeu MotM for me, but only just in front of Salisu and KWP. One of the most comfortable wins we've had since, uh, Everton at home?
  13. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    Getting bogged down in a drawn out war would be a disaster for Putin, I think he might have been caught slightly off guard by the level of resistance that's been shown. He's been appealing to the Ukraine military to overthrow the govornment too.
  14. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1149 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2549
  15. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    The USA is already sending more forces to NATO countries and pledging to fulfil its article 5 obligations.
  16. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    So we should base whether we honour treaties on whether we think Putin is nuts enough to directly attack a nuclear power with the ‘Moscow Criterion’ as part of its Nuclear Policy?
  17. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    ‘If’ we get into military conflict with Russia? The minute NATO is attacked we already are.
  18. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    The NATO treaty means that we wouldn’t be making a decision to go to war, we’d be making a decision to break up NATO. That’s something we wouldn’t have an appetite for. All this assumes that Putin thinks he can take on NATO, or gambles that NATO will break up. Even without having to go through Ukraine first, that would be a massive leap.
  19. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    Defending NATO is something Putin will fully be expecting. If that results in an attack on the UK, it’ll be because Putin is crazy enough to want to attack the UK anyway.
  20. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    You think Putin is ready to face the consequences of an attack on the UK?
  21. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    What do you think the world’s response would be to an attack on the UK? What makes you think Putin would think he had anything to gain from an attack on the UK? Biden is currently pledging to defend every inch of NATO territory with the full force of the USA’s military. What makes you think Putin will believe it’s a bluff?
  22. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    You keep framing the invasion of a NATO country as something small. Surely then, defending said country would also be ‘small’, but then you say that that could result in military action against the British Mainland, an action that would decidedly NOT be small. The invasion of a NATO country would NOT be small, and the breaking of the NATO treaty would be a massively unpopular move. It’s ridiculous to suggest otherwise.
  23. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    Imagine that the level of protesting being reported will have taken Putin by surprise a bit, considering what they’re risking. As for here, I can only speak for myself and the people I’ve spoken to today, but it’s been unanimous that any leader that broke the NATO treaty would lose our support.
  24. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    Like I said, the ramifications of breaking the NATO treaty would be too big to ignore. If we didn’t want to be obliged to defend them, the time to decide that was when they were admitted to NATO.
  25. Jimmy_D

    Russia

    I don’t think removal from SWIFT is off the table, but regardless of that, sanctions currently in place are having a massive impact on the Russian economy already.
×
×
  • Create New...