Jump to content

Jimmy_D

Moderators
  • Posts

    6,569
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jimmy_D

  1. Assuming Newcastle can put out a team for it. Could be away at Wolves.
  2. Was a pen but we’re being shafted by the ref here.
  3. That was a great game to watch.
  4. That didn’t look too clever either…
  5. Bit harsh on Newcastle, if they don’t get anything out of the game it’ll be a killer for morale.
  6. Have to admit, I do find it quite entertaining when Neville goes off on a rant, especially about Man Utd
  7. Ouch. That really didn’t look good on the replay.
  8. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    It’s nice when they do their own debunking for you 😂
  9. Was an absolutely cracking goal.
  10. Well that’s taken care of working off my Christmas dinner 😅 Great three points, especially against this season’s West Ham. Merry Christmas everyone!
  11. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Those viewpoints are starting from a pre-determined conclusion, ignoring any evidence to the contrary, and misrepresenting information they can use to make it appear as if it supports their view. It's not in any way scientific. Not to mention that Reiner Fullmich is conveniently forgetting to mention that he's not acting in any capacity as a Doctor of medicine, but is instead acting as a lawyer. They're not contributing to the pool of information on Covid in any way that's helpful or useful.
  12. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Covid-19: Irish GP who refused to vaccinate patients is suspended (bmj.com) ‘Nuremberg 2.0’: Why COVID Conspiracy Theorists See This Lawyer As Their Saviour (vice.com) Neither he, not the person he's quoting, have good track records for being honest and open about their conclusions.
  13. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Looks like it's from The number of vaccinated and unvaccinated people in hospital with Covid - Wales Online It conveniently ignores the leading line and just shows statistics out of context that to someone glancing wouldn't think they show what they show; "The data clearly demonstrates that people are far more likely to end up in hospital should they be unvaccinated" It also conveniently ignores the rest of the article afterwards explaining exactly WHY the leading line is how the statistics should be read. It's a disgusting thing to do, to be honest, to misrepresent data like that. If people decide not have the vaccine, that's fair enough. Could be they decided that they'd rather face the higher risk of harm from catching Covid and passing it on, could be ethical or religious grounds, or any other reason, but at the end of the day it's their choice. When they've based that decision, though, on false data, or out of context data, or false conclusions, those people haven't made a free informed choice. That's been taken away from them.
  14. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    What exactly do you think those numbers show? Because they show that the vaccine is working exactly as well as has been reported.
  15. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    If you're going to use amateur hour trolling like that, you're not going to get very far 😂
  16. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    That doesn't actually address the gaping hole I exposed in your argument.
  17. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    I take it you’re not familiar with the term “excess deaths” then.
  18. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Sorry, am I supposed to take someone seriously when they can’t even keep what they’re arguing straight inside one post? 😂 What was killing people at a far higher rate when Covid started then? You know, before the vaccines existed?
  19. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

  20. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    What makes you think I haven't read anything by scientists with contrasting opinions and made my own judgement?
  21. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    I thought they were poison? But I guess that would kill off their customers, so have you changed your mind about that part?
  22. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Yeah, I guess you're right, I could have avoided reading dozens of independent scientific white papers from around the world investigating Covid, or looking at the real world data from hundreds of sources showing the effectiveness of vaccines, and instead thought for myself and listened to the people on Twitter that have found out that they're all in a secret cabal plotting to make everyone's lives, including their own, worse so that... wait, what are they actually aiming to do by doing that again?
  23. Jimmy_D

    Coronavirus

    Don’t forget that this is the effect of three jabs they’re measuring. Without the booster, effectiveness really is reduced, especially against transmission. it’s a bit of luck that the same vaccine is still effective used as a booster. The UK in particular is well placed to take advantage of this, already having a big stockpile of vaccines now, and the infrastructure in place to distribute them extremely quickly. We might just be able to get ahead of Omicron infections at the pace we’re going.
  24. Jimmy_D

    Formula One

    Mercedes had to make a judgement on whether it would finish under the safety car. Had the written regulations been followed, they were correct. Every car other than Verstappen was disadvantaged by the way it was ended. Sainz couldn’t fight for 2nd and Verstappen didn’t have to worry about any attack from behind. Midfield battles were completely ignored. As for the brake test; https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article.breaking-verstappen-handed-further-10-second-penalty-for-lap-37-collision.7GGfMvAnRIGPtMQphh7zCd.html "In deciding to penalise the driver of Car 33, the key point for the Stewards was that the driver of car 33 then braked suddenly (69 bar) and significantly, resulting in 2.4g deceleration." The penalty for that was ridiculously light as well. As for Silverstone, that had very little difference to the first lap incident at Abu Dhabi, just that Verstappen was willing to and could afford to crash because of it.
  25. Jimmy_D

    Formula One

    Mercedes thought that the race would end under the safety car, and so didn’t pit. As the regulations are written, it should have done, it was only Masi making it up as he went along that meant a final lap of racing occurred, and no-one could base any decisions on that happening unless they were a mind reader. In effect Mercedes made the right call and it cost them the title. You add in what happened at Spa and the fact that it’s meant that Verstappen could afford to risk crashing both of them out every time he was defending… Verstappen’s driving standards are another matter. He’s been allowed to get away with utterly **** racing moves, and in any other formula, against any other driver, he’d have been lucky to escape a broken nose if he’d tried a brake test. This title will always be associated with how it ended. Tainted. All in all pretty disillusioned with F1 now.
×
×
  • Create New...