egg

Resolve

Starter

I think I'd go sooner rather than later.

Aye, just a cloth cap and pullover.

You're a Yorkshire man these days, surely that's like a mid summer's day to you.

Behave. I'm not refereeing your daft squabbles.

Mate, I'm not remotely interested in the detail, and raising it now is daft. Your perpetual flirting with Turkish and others interests only you and them. For the rest of us it's boring af, but it seems to drag on across multiple threads. Each to their own, but posting about the topic rather than the posters would be nice.

I'd have him in there as well. 433. Control the midfield and play through it, not over it.

What's the lesser of two evils, that or tippy tappy playing out?

That's the only post that matters.

Looks like she trusted SR to pick her surgeon.

Stewart up top (if for enough to start) should have been one the first names in the team sheet. AA has been shoe horned in. If that was felt necessary, down the right would have made more sense.

That's a wild stretch of the imagination. It'll be 4231. I'd guess that Matsuki will tuck in at times, and also play this inside right channel, with Bree on the overlap where possible. I think there's a method to the madness.

Good point! Can only kill in cold blood when you're nice and warm.

Although I'd have played Fellows, Matsuki is an irritating little player, with a bit of flair, and plays on the half turn. Surprising selection, but not unsuited imo.

Agreed. Bree is the kind of character for a game like this. Proper RB. I'd have had Fellows ahead of him though, and Stewart up top. It looks to me that he wanted AA in there for whatever reason though, and picked the team around that. Anyways, it was it what is. Let's do this.

Which of the links shows people being attacked in their cars, kids rendered unconscious, us citizens being shot? My understanding - I may be wrong - is that Obama's crackdown was largely near the border returning people back to Mexico. I'm certainly not aware that ICE used the kind of tactics we've seen recently.

Duke

Correct, but the point applies equally to the vast majority of issues discussed in here. Our thoughts on Burnham standing, for example, won't have any bearing on whether he does, and what then happens if so. It feels a tad odd that the irrelevance of an individuals view is given less weight on one particular when the reality is that it carries no real weight on most others.

Whatever it was, he was left with nothing in his hands, and had his arms aloft. He was then taken to the ground. He was no threat when he was shot.

Commence

It seems pretty clear that there's as much obsession with you as here is with Trump. The focus on the personalities - you're at is as well - rather than the topic, does the forum no favours at all and is boring af.

Careful mate, some idiot will be along shortly to tell you that you're obsessed, or have TDS, or argue some false equivalence re Obama turning people back near the border. It's bewildering that people expect others to keep quiet about what is happening on Trump's watch. Hopefully the US will wake up to it, but I suspect it'll get worse before it gets better.

There speaks a man with a public service pension which is unaffected by significant world events.

Reinforcements