egg

If a claim by Dave the builder from Dagenham about a vax doing xyz isn't corroborated by anything and it's just Dave's opinion it's reasonable to assume it's nonsense. Do you think that ramblings from the likes of Dave should be permitted on such an important matter?

No idea who, but the why should is on its merits and social impact. Idiots in the states believed trumps bleach nonsense, and people will believe that a vax will be damaging if they hear that message enough. For me, if the social media message is against the vax, and is based on bs and conjecture, that message should be cut off at the knees. If teh message had truth and was important to be heard, I'd think differently.

The problem with the anti vax crowd is that they argue against it on their principles, but often support it with false beliefs. If someone does not want a vaccine, that's up to them, but don't be forcing your views on others and relying on false beliefs in support. Doing so is irresponsible and dangerous. Because of that I'm in support of a ban.

It's quite easy to join the dots laid out by the club and see that the issue is likely a sensitive one. It says more about you than the cub that you feel a "right" to know something that most can see is private, and that should stay private. Ask yourself 2 simple questions: 1. Will it bring Salisu any benefit for the public to know details about his issue? 2. Will it bring the public any benefit to know any details about his issue? No to both is the only reasonable answer imo.

Calling the 3rd party a liar, which is essentially what you're saying, is a bit strong.

Yep. It's not hard to comprehend.

I'm not talking about the gay point. Not sure why you raise it.

Go easy expressing an opinion mate. They're not allowed.

It wasn't. Post up the words that you say he used expressing his opinion. I'll help you though - there were none.

A conspiracy theorist could have an opinion on the latter. He's now out of the job.

We'll agree to differ. In passing on my experience with my daughters, I'm passing on fact not expressing an opinion. Clarke did exactly the same. If you say that he expressed a personal opinion about girls / footy / goalkeepers, you're wrong.

That's an opinion. I'm talking facts.

We're approaching this completely differently. I'm not suggesting that my girls experience proves anything, other than a) it happened, and that b) my experience is in line with what Clarke said. Clarke was reporting facts as he understood them. There can be no issue with it. Like it or not, reality and stereotypes can match.

Confusion

Yep to all of that. I believe that he also said that black people are in fact over represented in football as against Asian people. Also correct. Indeed, he could have gone further and said that black people are over represented in football in terms of the proportion of black players to the population. No doubt there may be factors why black people excel in football and rightly achieve their potential, and on the opposite side of the coin, good reason why black people / Asian people / females /etc don't do so well in certain areas of society.

Skilful ones too. Not £25m ones though.

All girls are different, I can only say what mine were like. Based on their experience, I can accept what Clarke was told, and in the context of the forum, why he raised it. People in authority cannot be fearful of giving anecdotes and explanations in case it breaches some unwritten social rules.

That William Fish must surely be known as Billy the Fish. Poor lad.

Looming

I'm not with you on this. It's not hard to understand that the issues are personal, and it's reasonable to assume that they are of a sensitive nature. We have absolutely no right to know any more, and it won't help the fella for it be put into the public domain. There are too many insensitive fans putting their perceived need for information above the actual needs of a human being.

Because in the context of why girls don't come into the game and become goalkeepers, it's entirely correct to give an explanation as to why girls don't come into the game and become goalkeepers. When the truth offends and can't be spoken, there is a problem. I believe what he was told. I have 2 daughters and tried to get them into footy. They hated getting the ball booted at them. And getting muddy. And getting cold. They both quit. One went on to do dance, and the other trampolining. Very well in fact. In the real world, the reality often matches the stereotypes.

Scaffold

Brilliant interview. Nice insight into transfer and loan policies, and a kick in PEH's bollox too. Ralph is a class act.

Hole

Jeez, that system is more of a nonsense than I appreciated. Thanks for the explanation, much appreciated. I hope that you and the clan get well soon.