egg

Blimey, I was working today and have just checked on the forum. This is hilarious. MLG. Please educate yourself. Type these words into Google, then read some of the links. "is the Noah and The Ark story a metaphor" Also substitute "allegory" for metaphor. Believe it or not, not everything is literal, or intended to be.

Pipe

...

Has it occurred to you that the noah and the ark story is a metaphor, not literal?

Ground

Horror

I've told you I'm not debating with you. If I answer one question, I'll be facing 24 more. I can't be arsed. Just accept that other people have opinions that you don't have to agree with. Live and let live pal.

We've been here before. I asked how, for example, if someone prays for other people, and feels some peace from doing so, how that prayer could impact on you or others. Whether you ever accepted that the simple answer is that it doesn't, I can't recall and can't be arsed to look. Regardless, it's a personal belief Matthew, a personal choice, and has f*ck all to do with you. Just accept that you're not that important, and that people can believe in God, the Bible, religion if they wish.

I'm not debating with you. It's pointless. I make the simple point that you can believe what you want re God, religion, and the Bible. Others can have their own beliefs - I repeat it has f*ck all to do with you. Don't be so arrogant as to believe other peoples beliefs have anything to do with you.

It is not "worthwhile" for someone to choose to believe something only if it stands up to questions of others, and definitely not form someone on a footy forum. My beliefs have f*ck all to do with you. Your beliefs have f*ck all to do with me. You're an atheist (or whatever). I wouldn't dream of asking you why and wouldn't be so arrogant as to ask you to explain why. Perhaps try giving others the same respect. Re humans interbreeding. I don't know, but why would anyone be interested. There's more going on in the world than taking an interest in something that is plainly irrelevant to anyones lives.

Matthew, this is as simple as if you do not wish to believe in God or the works of the Bible, then you don't have to. That's your choice. Others can believe in one or more of those 3 things if they wish. It's genuinely very sad that you cannot see the futility of arguing against other peoples choice to believe in something that millions of people choose to believe in.

If he answers you'll only challenge every nuance of the answer, and when you get answers you don't like, you'll ask another question that's equally pointless about something equally irrelevant to you and everyone else.

Yep. I remember a sketch called 3 fights, 2 weddings and a funeral. Very funny.

Your last part re moving the goalposts nails it. There's no point addressing MLG's points because he won't accept it, but when he runs out of things to say he then throws another question out there, and repeats ad infinitum. He then pushed for answers when it was obvious that nobody could be arsed to see the cycle continue. Sadly, the discussion on here has flowed from MLG refusing to accept that people can have their individual beliefs. That has nothing to do with MLG or anyone. Refusing to allow people their own thoughts, opinions, and beliefs without feeling an entitlement to challenge is a pretty sad state of affairs.

Mr.

Yes, her honesty and openness was refreshing. Can't imagine we'll see her again.

Counselling

Oh man, you get worse MLG - asking for DNA evidence of a bible story. Jeez.

I guess the issue is the TV camera positions. St Mary's is set up for it. Whilst Staplewood has some for the u18 and u23 games, I doubt they have the whole setup that sky etc would want for broadcast.

Scared to death, behave? We have social distancing measures for a reason. My willingness to respect them, and frustration at idiots that don't, does not make me scared to death. If you're out and about, you will have noted that many people aren't respecting social distancing. If you're cool with that, it says more about me than you.

Yep. I can only assume Duck is a hermit. If not he'd see for himself that people behaved last week as if there was no virus or risk. Its astonishing.

Not for me. Hoedt is average, Vestergaard is shocking. But then there's the attitude, Hoedt comes across as an idiot. I suspect management could live with that if he was brilliant, but it's not worth it for someone of his ability.

Errr, errr, where have I said I don't want people to stay at him? I've said that the stay at home message should remain as teh general message, but, that there should be a slight relaxing of the excersize rules. Until this week, the government message was once for an hour max, but the law was unlimited anyway. What, imo, was needed was an expansion of what the public believed the position to be to say twice per day up to a max of say 2 hours combined, meeting up to say 2 others (to Inc both parents) and drive say a max of 10 miles to exercise. What do you say the government should have done/said? Answers to my other questions?

I don't know if you exercise outside or shop in supermarkets, but if you did, you would realise that a hell a lot of people this last week are acting as if we're back to normal, no attempt to distance, shopping with kids running around, etc. That change has come since last weekend - I went to the same supermarket the same time last Sunday and today. The difference was night and day. If it's not the government message that's brought about that change, what has? What was wrong with keeping the old message and relaxing the guidelines?