egg

Jeez. Is that the kind of stuff we are dealing with? Please hypo read it to yourself and ask yourself whether his little comment was upsetting or justified your response. It definately didn't deserve a penalty imo. If you did not complain about that (and there was no reason why you should imo) how did it lead to an infraction (if it did)?? Is that the link to the most serious offence?

I did not say that deppo did not know what he had done. I said that I would like to know what he has done. So far we have been given the headline that his humour/sarcasm has upset and that he has taken threads off piste. No detail has been given and there has been no indication that this offensive behaviour has actually offended anyone, or led to any complaints. Don't get me wrong I don't know deppo, or frankly giVe a monkeys about him. What I don't like is this lack of information and the fact that one of the few decent posters on this declining site has been kicked off for having a sense of humour.

Detail? Example? Link to one or more of these 19 illegal posts? Go on, please.

What, for asking why somebody has gotten into trouble. You can even ask that where you are can't you?

Not a bad idea. We still don't know what these 19 serious felonies were and/or whether anyone was so distressed by them that they felt the need to complain. A cynic could think that they were not at all serious, that nobody was upset but that an over zealous admin took it upon himself to dole out capital punishment. No doubt I will be corrected...

Agree with verbal. I do not post often but I do read the forum quite a bit. Deppo was funny. Sure he took the **** a bit but I never read anything abusive and certainly never anything racist or so unpleasant it deserved him being kicked off the site. One by one the decent posters are being kicked off or leaving cos the place is so boring. You've only got to look at the reduced number of new threads, and the reduced number of posters, to see the way the site is going

Does it really matter if someone goes off at a tangent? It tends not to upset me too much.

Quite. It may be that on some or all of these 19 occasions that nobody complained or felt the need to.

It doesn't. This is a members forum. The rules and how they are to implemented and enforced should be shared with its members.

Perhaps he didn't think that he had crossed the line. It may be that the threshold is too low. Indeed, I haven't got a clue where the line is. Out of interest, does punishment get issued where the victim of perceived abuse does not complain? I would be concerned if the line was being drawn subjectively by admin in circumstances where nobody felt the need to complain. Most of us are big boys and should be trusted to sort things out ourselves, surely?

So banned for being sarcastic and telling jokes. That's ridiculous.

Why can't admin be more transparent ? This "we've sent someone to his room but won't tell anyone why" approach is a bit silly imo.

What were the infraction points for? This board has gone downhill big time since the old board died. Anyone of interest gets banned so others leave as there is less of interest. Do the owners of the this site really think that banning people with an opinion makes for a better forum?

I offered my view of his performance today at rb, not as a cm as he did not play there!

Don't be so precious. All I'm saying, and the others, is that he didn't set the world alight today playing half a game. Nobody has said that he looked a poor player or that he would be a bad signing. Not sure where your "your stupidly high expectations" is coming from.

I hope that's the case. Interesting that Pearce moved Mancienne from right back to centre mid when Cork came on rather than playing both of them in more natural positions. Probably says more about Pearce than Cork to be fair though.

Agreed. He struggled to get forward and struggled positionally. On that performance I can't see what he would add to us as a right back.

Both my beef madras ones were superb.

Not a great game.I spent to first half saying ****e rose was and how it was a crime that he was in team ahead of lallana. He then scored a cracker. That aside I thought that his general play was well below the quality that Adam could haVe provided. Cork was steady at right back but would add nothing to our side if he played in that position. The keeper, fielding, produced about the worst display of distribution that I have ever seen. Not the best game but a bargain at the price.

machine

Teenager

My missus abuses her data allowance like you wouldn't believe and has never had a problem. Get on the giff gaff support forum on their site or facebook page and see what others are saying.

Christmas

02 I think.

Ted