egg

His name has been mentioned to me before christmas and since by a few people close to the club. Nothing concrete has been said but I think there is more chance of that than Hooper.

Field

geezer

we were due to pay a fee of one million for a deal last week but it didn't proceed. no information as to who it was or any other detail. perhaps a loan fee or completion of the lee signing?

Good player but not what we need. He would be a great foil for Lambert as a big/little man combo. We need another proper centre forward.

Simple rule - if in doubt change it together with all tensioners and water pump. 60k is there or thereabouts regardless of the car.

Avoid the obvious. Ian Baird would be a good shout. Colourful character and still involved with local football.

Spot on. There is no point people saying that in 1984 we we were in the top flight but now are in div 2. I don't think this team us anything like our best ever but i really don't think that the championship now is a lower standard than the top flight was in 1984.

I agree, but is the second tier today a lesser standard than the top flight in 1984?

Both are excellent and will suit your needs. Go for the 360, it's cheaper.

Porridge with honey and sultanas. I have it daily and bounce all day. If we run out then weetabix with honey. Quite like a bit of muesli too. Lidl own is mighty fine.

I must have glazed over by then!

Jeez, this thread has gone mental. The op made the mistake of suggesting that the car would fly through it's mot with only a few jobs. Whether he knew more than that only he knows - either way he was naive, at best, to say what he did. He sold it as seen so will probably be ok if the buyer brings a claim. Whether he should be is another matter.

Cheers.

I think it's a cracking draw. They have a real chance of winning. Second round away to a top end league one club will earn them some money, or another winnable game at home gives them a chance of making round 3. I intend to go along. Does anyone know ticket details?

Fair play to your folks. It's a tough process. The form f assessment, if done properly, is really hard. People have to talk about their childhood, relationship history, morals, attitudes to sexual orientation and all sorts. It has to be done though. Adoption is a second chance for kids so the adopters have to be scrutinized properly.

In theory yes although the adoption agency will probably reject anyone with recent convictions, or historic if a serious offence. If the agency say yes the adoption panel could say no if they felt that their was a risk.

Probably what is happening, ie social services will keep tabs on the situation and act accordingly.

Im struggling with your lack of grasp of a simple concept.

No.

You highlight the point about vulnerability which exposes kids to danger. Stupidity doesnt negate the risks.

What makes you ask that?!? What a stupid question. Course she shouldnt be sterilized! She can have kids, thats her right. The issue is the safety of her child if she brings another wrong un into her kids life

You may be right about her - who knows. As I say, I have made a general observation.

She gave him a false alibi for the time that the kids died. She was aware that the girls were missing and that the alibi was false. She was dishonest and should have realised that the two matters were linked.

Where kids are involved you must err on the side of caution. The "she's done her time so let's give her a chance and hope for the best" approach is somewhat risky. Defo one where we must agree to disagree.