egg

They're not saying that at all. They're saying they're invading Rafah, that a date has been set, and that nobody's gonna stop them.

Err. What about Israel opposing a Palestinian state? Fortunately Australia seem to have sense. Them recognising Palestine as a state may start something meaningful. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-09/austalian-government-considers-recognising-state-of-palestine/103687666

Feck, that's just mental. Bless.

Red herrings. RM's brand of walking football, with suicidal tactics, would have is slaughtered in the PL. Look at what Bristol City, Sunderland away, Hull and Liverpool's children did to us then ask yourself of the bloke responsible for that could manage on the PL. He'd be a disaster whatever players he had at his disposal.

But it's a very valid point. Puel achieved pretty well in the prem playing dull football. Martin hasn't achieved in the championship playing dull football. RM's football would be a disaster on the Prem. Puel's wasn't.

Declared

Two ex saints who didn't make the grade here as wing backs yesterday too. It's a sign. #unfinishedbusiness #bringmadnathhome

Conflict

Canal

Fair point 🤣

There's only one interpretation of your refusal to say that you're an equal opportunities supporter of the mass killings of innocent civilians.

Nah, you're rowing backwards.

Better than Paris. That's hideous. Anyways, use a cab or the metro, small and well formed.

You said that killing 20 people in Gaza to kill one alleged low level alleged Hamas operative was acceptable. Those are Muslim deaths. It's a fact. There's no accusation - it's you and now Weston who've thrown the slurs around. What you are continually refusing to do is answer my hypothetical Ireland question. Those would have been non Muslim deaths. If you would have been ok with innocent Irish people being slayed to kill alleged low level IRA operatives then we've established that you're equally opportunities in your acceptance of innocent deaths. Only you can clarify your position.

I vote Stephens will be at CB. Bednarek benched. KWP and Manning back in. Something mental like that.

Question - Does war justify killing 20 innocent people for 1 low level target? Your - According to Shari'a law, there are no "innocent" people once a fatwah has been declared. FTF and I both interpreted that the same way.

It's not just me who interpreted your words in the way that I did. If you want to make a point, perhaps be clearer and less flippant. You're better than throwing around daft allegations of racism Weston. In any event, Israel are an apparently civilised western nation and should be judged accordingly.

@Lord Duckhunter what's the answer? Were Irish lives as expendable as Muslim lives?

That's the point. Your point seemed to be that the Israeli killing of Palestinians was ok cos the Palestinians had issued a Fatwa. If that wasn't your point, wtf was your point?

Stop avoiding questions. Would you have been ok with Britain doing to Ireland what Israel have done to Gaza? Yes or no. Would you have been ok with Britain regularly killing 20 innocent Irish people to kill one alleged low level IRA operative? Yes or no.

If you want to look back in time, should we have wiped out the IRA? Given that you feel that what Israel are doing to Gaza is ok, presumably you would have been ok seeing Dublin, Derry etc, flattened? The infrastructure and churches destroyed? Loads of innocent people taken out in the process? Ask yourself why we didn't do that. Ask yourself if we now have relative peace on Ireland. Then ask yourself whether Israeli actions will achieve peace or something else.

Show

Vauxhall

Or Israeli's.

You're lucky you weren't in Gaza mate, the Israeli's have proper weapons and clearly don't give a fuck who they kill to get at the Hamas cake boy. Anyways, you previously said that killing innocent people as collateral damage is ok, when Muslim are being killed.