egg

You're lucky you weren't in Gaza mate, the Israeli's have proper weapons and clearly don't give a fuck who they kill to get at the Hamas cake boy. Anyways, you previously said that killing innocent people as collateral damage is ok, when Muslim are being killed.

I appreciate it's easier to change the subject than to try to justify your views on the murderous Israeli regime, but I ain't playing that game. If you want to discuss past conflicts, start another thread.

What a great contribution to an Israel/Gaza thread, it's really added something to the debate about what's happening in April 2024. You're wrong for what it's worth.

It's 2024 Alex, and we're trying to discuss Israel/Gaza. Please keep up.

Manning, I think, is largely following daft orders. You could see from his 1st pre season game that he was doing things differently to others (ie drifting inside) and that will have come from playing for RM before and knowing what he's expected to do. He's also had some pretty non existent cover in front of him lots of the time. Played as a conventional left back, with some hardworking cover ahead of him, I think he'd be decent enough. Adams though has been shite. If he could finish, we'd be knocking on the door of the top 2. His inadequacies are that significant imo - he's really cost us. As for Charles, the Liverpool cup game was him in a nutshell. If I was in RM's shoes, I'd have no trust in him either.

Sam played 90 for the u-21's last night, ditto Dibling. It'll be the usual roll of the dice today.

That comment is one hell of a stretch. Wilcox was headhunted by one of the world's biggest clubs, and nobody can realistically blame SR for him wanting to take that opportunity. I can't disagree with the rest of your post though.

Your views are unacceptable in my view. You bang on about the non anti semitic soggy being anti semitic, but let's be honest Duck, you're not on any moral high ground with a lot of your comments. Anyways, I'll go no further as I'll leave the focus on personalities to people who choose to deflect. Your view that killing 20 innocent people to kill one (alleged) low level Hamas operative is deplorable in my opinion. Frankly, you've got to be a bit of a cunt to think the Israeli actions are right. You didn't answer my hypothetical question about the low level IRA operative. Presumably you feel that wiping out a building full of people to take out the cake boy in that situation would have been ok? Or is that kind of behaviour only ok against Muslims?

Exactly. Hamas issuing a fatwa against an invading force apparently gives licence to Israel to kill anyone and everyone. Weston's got lost down his own rabbit hole on this one.

Berlin

Pound

Charles has been poor imo. City pulled our pants down on him (and Baz, Larios, and to an extent, Edozie). Sulemana has the ability to tear this league apart, but he looks like he doesn't want to be out there playing for us. All of the above were a waste of money. Sulemana more then the rest, and the frustrating thing is that with some proper effort, we'd have made a good profit from him.

Seems that way. He's a cracking player, and arguably out most important.

Guru

I'm not sure that extends to an invading army, and their airplanes/drones that don't touch the Gaza ground.

Ha!! I'll carry on playing the post not the poster, anl like what I like mate, especially posts that call out people's unacceptable views.

I know. I repeat the question, what does that have to do with Israel killing Muslims? Israel don't practice Sharia law. Should we punish Muslims over here using Sharia law?!

Oh the irony.

How does that relate to Israeli's killing 20 innocents to get 1 alleged Muslim van driver?

Estate

On the first part. Let's say that back in the day some young Irish lad goes and buys the cakes for an IRA meeting. Helping them. Would it have been ok for the British army to blow up a place where he's staying and kill 20 innocents? Would those deaths have been on the IRA, or the army? The second part is too daft to address. This isn't WW2. It's not even a war.

The only reasonable answer is no. I'd be interested to know who on here is honest enough to say yes.

Strange part of the article to focus in. To address that, let's assume that he's perhaps a bloke that went to a Hamas meeting, or drives a Hamas vehicle. They therefore blow his house up killing another 20 innocent people. Is that reasonable in your opinion?

UN human rights council have backed a resolution for a weapons ban on Israel for its war conduct. Only 6 nations opposed the resolution. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-middle-east-68738452?ns_mchannel=social&ns_source=twitter&ns_campaign=bbc_live&ns_linkname=660fc902b26acd1fbf33090b%26Why the UN rights council vote on Israel is significant%262024-04-05T12%3A46%3A16.499Z&ns_fee=0&pinned_post_locator=urn:asset:28274bf9-6216-456b-b198-c9808aafc2d8&pinned_post_asset_id=660fc902b26acd1fbf33090b&pinned_post_type=share

I think you've lost your way a bit in your attempt to justify your sympathies on this issue.