Jump to content

stknowle

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    4,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stknowle

  1. stknowle

    Puel

    Exactly how I see it.
  2. "Beer, beer we want more beer, get another round in etc" the whole stadium was merrily chanting it as they looked forward to toasting our excellent first half showing with a wonderfully tepid pint of Carlsberg. Or something.
  3. Agree he should be given a chance, won't boo him, but my instincts and the football I've seen us play so far are telling me his appointment is a mistake. Totally hope I'm wrong.
  4. I'm not liking him either I have to say. It is early days but I just don't feel positive that he will turn out to be the right appointment. Watford and Sunderland at home are two games you absolutely target/expect wins in and he's p!ssed them both up the wall.
  5. Agree. Our main problem right now is we have a manager who is trying to fix something that wasn't broken in the first place.
  6. Strikes me as the stubborn type who will persist. Apart from the first 10 minutes this has been very poor against one of the weakest teams in the league which is further weakened through injury.
  7. ITKwatch...to meet up with you for a threesome?
  8. This. It is very unlikely both our first number 1 and 2 choice keepers would be injured at the same time but, just in case that happens , we have bought Stuart Taylor and his 78 games in 15 years or whatever it is experience, for fear of otherwise having to play Lewis.
  9. What does that mean? Suggests that Cedric would not sign until he knew Fonte was definitely staying yet has now signed even though he does not know that Fonte is definitely staying.
  10. Chrissake he looks a handful but ever so slightly "raw" from the (admittedly little) I've seen of him. Probs not true anyway.
  11. Not that it means a lot or in fact anything but the Sun had Targett as our stand out player (7 out of 10). Everyone else played to exactly the same standard and got 6 out of 10 each.
  12. Utd looked no better than us for most of the match tbh but they have Ibrahimovic and we have Long. Not saying it's Long's fault it's just the difference having a world renowned galactico up front can and will make.
  13. It will. We are missing a main man, no pun intended. Otherwise I think we are well set.
  14. He does. Very good indeed.
  15. Playing well. Clearly won't be in any kind of trouble this year. Still definitely need at least one more quality option up front.
  16. This is what eelipsis Anyway don't see us making it 3 wins on the bounce at Old Trafford...
  17. Can't we just tone it all down a bit and use "Chum" instead. Less aggressive and more pedigree than Pal, pal.
  18. Apologies not required. Utterly indecipherable.
  19. Hopefully you're right but he's had 3 seasons of playing with and against good premiership footballers and is yet to become one himself. Hojberg's performance yesterday served to highlight how ineffective he was/is.
  20. TBF it is early days but I share your concerns about Puel. Roy Hodgson has proved that clueless ****wits can get a long way in football. No proof that Puel is that, no proof he isn't.
  21. Hojberg? Were you "meh" about him?
  22. (assuming he did get the arse of course. If not apols JF0
  23. Exactly. Get the right arse as much as you like Jose, it doesn't suit us to sell you right now so ****ing live with it.
×
×
  • Create New...