Lord Duckhunter

You didn’t need it, but tried to sponge off the state anyway. All because your Mrs didn’t like her job. It’s people like you which bring the benefits system into disrepute. Moaning about only have one car because you live in the sticks, fucking hell, you couldn’t make it up. Thinking the tax payer should subsidise your second car, dear god, it’s unbelievable. To think you preach about selfishness and immorality of Tories and reform voters, yet want your 2 income lifestyle maintained when your Mrs stops voluntarily stops working.

They don’t.

It was a save I’d expect a reasonably competent keeper to make. In other words, it was surprising Baz didn’t let it in…

Sounds like you and your Mrs were two them. Moaning that the tax payer didn’t pony up because of your pension & the lack of a mortgage. This is the problem with welfare, people who don’t need it, thinking it’s a right. It’s spread way too thinly, with the deserving getting less because of that.

😂😂 The nod’s go to idea. Bring Nigel or Ralph back to help the manager. What’s your next suggestion, let me guess, Beats in to coach the forwards…..😂

The salary sacrifice stuff looks like it could be something with unintended consequences long term. It won’t affect my age group too much as it’s delayed (probably in the hope it won’t need to be implemented), but it will end up giving younger people less in retirement. Whilst not as far reaching as Gordon Brown , who basically killed FS pensions in the private sector, it will widen the generation gap when it comes to pensions and when people can retire.

Pretty much spot on…

If he loses 3 or 4 on the bounce people will be moaning he was given the job. I’m torn myself. He clearly hasn’t got the experience, but 4 out of 4 is deserving of the job. You never know, he could be exceptional & be a fantastic manager, but equally it could be new manager bounce, with him not having the know how to manage after the initial bounce. Nobody really knows. The ideal solution would be to give him the gig until the end of the season, but you do risk losing him to a Fulham/Bournemouth type club during a preseason management merry go round, if he does turn out to be a gem.

Fucking joker… We’re far more tolerant than most, including the French, Italians, Poles & Hungarians all of whom are in the EU….You need to get out of your white ghetto a bit more.,

We were in a higher league. So no, we didn’t score 5 in the first half when we beat Liverpool, City, Arsenal or Chelsea. We probably would have had a few 5’s had we been facing more teams fresh out of league 1… Dear god, it wasn’t performance of the decade. It was our best performance in a very poor season. That’s it, calm down a bit and see how the next few weeks pan out.

There were plenty under Puel & Ralph,against far better sides than Charlton. There were one or two under Hughes as well, we had just as good performances under Lego in this league last time out. Even Nathan jones produced one in the cup which was just as good. I guess denying City the only trophy they didn’t win that season, doesn’t match up with beating a team fresh out of league 1. People need to calm down, far better players than charltion, QPR & Sheffield Weds beat those 3 sides, playing very well in one of those games, that’s it. Nothing more, nothing less.

Make your mind up, is it a decade or 2025?

He said it was one of the best performances in a decade. Clearly exaggerated pony.

What a load of old exaggerated pony. It was Charlton FFS. The jury is still out for me, but at least he’s allowed us some thinking time, and we don’t need to rush an appointment.

Fucking disgrace. You bat all day from there, grind it out. All this ridiculous Bazball means the bowlers have to go out and take 10 more Aussie wickets the next day. Why are they trying to reinvent the wheel. From 100 odd ahead with 9 wickets in hand you bat them out the game, leaving 2 results, draw or England win. I doubt we’ll win a test from here, unless we do our usual and win one once the series is lost.

Fucking ridiculous batting. FFS, I’m visiting my son, due to the shite weather in Sydney we’re in an ale house watching with a load of Aussies. Even they can’t believe we’re batting like this. Play properly FFS

His father in law works at Sunseeker & they are, or were, Saints supporters

You mean like pretty much every single team in the top 2 divisions.

It’s your sexist posts that were weird. Lowered the tone of the debate. I suggest you think before posting such pony in future….

I’m abroad so haven’t been keeping up with the political ins & outs or this thread. Logged back in & Sog has turned it into “Carry on Westminster”. Read the room and stop digging, you weirdo…

😂😂😂

It’s self defeating as well and it’s pretty immoral, what ever side of the debate you’re on. It highlights the lack of financial education in the general population as well as it’s probably the most abhorrent way of generating more revenue from income tax. People considered too low paid to pay tax, suddenly paying it, due to inflation rather than an upturn in their circumstances, yet the public doesn’t really see this for what it is. Whilst I don’t agree with it, increasing income tax, then cutting NI (which was the floated idea) is a more coherent approach if you want to raise tax, but soften the blow for the lowest paid.

Freezing thresholds is an increase. And before you start, they’ve all done it since Gordon Brown released a lot of the population don’t understand that. It’s only half wits that think freezing thresholds doesn’t increase tax, and judging by your post, you’re clearly one of them.

Typical referee…