Lord Duckhunter

Love it. Corbyn’s millionaire “tycoon “ mate fighting Tom Watson’s old seat, is tax avoider. For the many not the few. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There’s not one politician who wants to make society unfair. It’s just they disagree on how you do so. The problem with you lefties is you think you have the moral case, that you’re the “caring” ones. It’s pure pony. You don’t make society fairer by making rich people poorer. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#draintheswamp #makeBritaingreatagain Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Not only was he successful, but the way we played the players he signed, & the nippers he played , gave me the greatest years of my football life. I’ve never given a flying fig, that he left, couldn’t care less whether he had his hand in the till, and don’t particularly care what anyone else thinks. He could have shot bambi for all I care, those years gave him a free pass from me. He’s a ****ing legend. End of. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Would have taken that all day long pregame, but bitter blow at the end. Manager spot on today, and we played some decent stuff. Far far better shape. But miss those chances and this league will kill you. Interesting that most Arsenal fans I spoke to, which admittedly was only a dozen or so, think we are going down. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I agree. We could do a lot better. Gove is a ****ing Cameron pinko, and aside from Brexit so was Boris. The juries out on whether Boris has genuinely seen the light and become a proper Tory. If he hasn’t, he’ll have to go. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Didn’t catch the debate, so interested in the unbiased opinions of respected posters on here. Surprised that the anti Boris crowd said he had a mare, they’re normally so balanced. Listened to Stephen Bush who claimed Boris will come out happiest, mainly because of Krankie insisting Corbyn will fold and give her indi 2, but also because he did ok in front of a hostile audience. However, Bush must be a far right facist to think Boris did ok, so I’ll go with the balanced guys on here. After all they don’t let their political affiliations and hatred of Boris cloud their judgement. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Old McDonnell getting in a bit of a mess today. Claims the IFS isn’t a credible organisation. Strange then that they’re quoted 17 times in his manifesto costings. And to think there’s people on here going to vote for these charlatans. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why should he, it’s none of your damn business Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow, if this is their pitch up north, god help them. http:// https://mobile.twitter.com/jamescleverly/status/1197794528519999488 Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Stay classy Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

“The Labour manifesto states they want to raise £80billion in tax revenue and that all of that will come from companies and people earning over £80k a year. That’s simply not credible. You can’t raise that kind of money in our tax system“ Paul Johnson, Institute of Fiscal Studies Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

#cuethelefties Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So it’s the same then? Cue the lefties explaining why it’s different Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They do Only slightly different. The Tory one had ; CCHQ in the bio CCHQ in the Twitter handle CCHQ in cover image Labour's fact-checker: Doesn't tell you it's Labour in the name or handle Doesn't tell you it's Labour in any of their branding. Other than that, and the “fact” they started it in Sept, as opposed to Nov, they’re similar. No doubt you’ll be consistent and be critical of Labour as well. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where are all the black & ethnic minorities, at the back of the bus? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is you who has the problem reading. Those 7% are catered for by a free electoral id scheme . As quoted by C4 fact check here. As you’re keen on The Electoral Commission maybe you should read their report of Dec 15 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The white middle class Magical Mystery Tour remake looks ****e. Roll up, Roll up, that’s an invitation to hear the “fool on the hill”. #poshbus******s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

At the moment there is a check to ensure people don’t vote twice. So the principle of the state regulating a check is already in place & a given. Bearing that in mind, what is the appropriate check? Someone giving their name and the polling station taking their word for it, or somebody showing their id. I think we all know the answer to that one. No I do not believe there is widespread electoral fraud (maybe 2 or 3 seats) , but that shouldn’t stop us legislating against it. If your argument is we shouldn’t legislate because it doesn’t happen much, then plenty of laws wouldn’t exist. It does go on, there’s no doubt about that, and if it changes one seat, that’s one too many. If there’s one example, that’s one too many. If you’re against the principle of showing Id for anything, that’s one thing. But for labour to demand it to attend events (I doubt there’s widespread attempts from people without it, to attend), then surely the right to vote is more becoming of id than to listen to Diane Abbott’s pony for 2 hours. There can only be two explanations, they’re opposing it for the sake of it and playing political games, or they benefit from it not being in place. I know which one I think it is. Anyway, it’ll now be down to the people to decide. Not you, and certainly not me. If Boris wins, it’ll happen , if he doesn’t it won’t. That’s democracy for you. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

God, how many more times. The Government proposals (rejected by labour) included this: “Anyone who does not have an approved form of ID will be able to apply, free of charge, for an electoral identity document from their local council” I presume you now back the proposals, or will you find another excuse. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The Government were proposing this exactly. A free ID card to enable people to vote for those who claim they have non. People could even use it to attend Labour Party meetings. We all know why labour oppose it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why would I read anything published by the BBC, and as for the ****ing electoral commission, they’re just as bad. Political appointees, part of the Blairette blob we’ll be clearing out eventually. The simple fact is, everybody has id in this day and age. The most important and fundamental right the people have is to vote. Anyone who doesn’t believe you should prove who you are before doing so is only taking that position because it benefits their side. When the Labour Party make people show id to attend meetings, but argue against it for the vote you know they’ve lost the argument. It’s a very very simple and straightforward question. Should people prove who they are before voting? I can’t think anyone would answer that question , no. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dear god, quoting the BBC as some sort of independent body. As an earlier poster stated. Nobody can really argue with the fact that you should have to prove who you are when voting. I doubt there’s one person eligible to vote who hasn’t got id. However the Government proposals also involved bringing in a new free ID card to use when voting. No doubt the young, poor & ethnic minorities somehow won’t be able to apply for that as well. After getting his WA through, let’s hope voter id and equalising constituency sizes are next on Boris’ agenda. Both of which distort our democracy. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So the young, poor & ethnic minority’s don’t show id at post office collecting a parcel? The young don’t show it to buy fags or ale? You have to show it to attend Labour Party events, they must be a party of rich older British then, as the young, poor and ethnic couldn’t get by the id checks. What a load of pony. Id is shown by everyone in the modern world, it’s been shown at NI elections for years and nobody is disenfranchised. Perhaps they’re all rich and old. The reason labour don’t want voter id is because they benefit from voter fraud, pure and simple. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Why won’t labour accept voter id then. Bearing in mind the things we do need id for it’s unbelievable that any reasonable person would complain about showing it to vote. We all know why, including you. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk