Lord Duckhunter

Let’s re-sign Gaston as well. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Somebody shut Jenas up, he’s doing my ****ing head in. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Bit worrying for spurs that they’ve let 3 in and Agüero hasn’t had a sniff of goal yet. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Dear god!!!!! Of course there’s a big difference between rape & consensual sex, that’s the point people are trying to make to you. This was not rape, if it was Evans would be inside. It was consensual sex, how many times do you need telling before it sinks in? Who said Evans got her drunk, according to you he’d only just met her. Make your mind up. You seem to think that birds are delicate wall flowers, that need protecting from themselves. I don’t, I think they should have the right to act like men. Go out and get bladdered and then bang whoever they want. I’ve had a go on plenty of 3/10’s when I’ve been polluted and regretted it in the morning. They took advantage of my drunken state, they didn’t rape me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I will always defend the right of men & women to drink too much and indulge in threesomes, because their sex life & legal behaviour has absolutely nothing to do with me. What are you the moral police, maybe you should move to Dubai or Pakistan where your intolerance will be welcomed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is complete and utter pony. You seem stuck in the 70’s. Birds past sexual history (except in exceptional circumstances ) is never taken into account, neither is what she was wearing or whether she was covered in bruises. You’ve just made a load of pony up based on your dislike of white working class blokes. Had it been a white working class bird involved in a threesome with Mohamed & Aabidullah you’d be singing a different song. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Welcome to my world Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t know where to start with this catalogue of pony. You’re now throwing guilt at the other innocent party as well as Evans. It is not for you, or me, or anyone else to decide if anyone is “technically” guilty of rape. Had you made such an outrageous comment in a newspaper I suggest you’d be facing a libel charge. You really need to distinguish between bad behaviour and illegal behaviour, especially when it involves matters like rape. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Am I a terrorist apologist if I declare that the Birmingham six are innocent and were victims of a miscarriage of justice. After all they were convicted originally. Is someone convicted in an unsafe conviction, then acquitted, less innocent than someone merely acquitted Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

A victim of rape, is a victim. End of. The disagreement on this thread is whether this bird was raped or not. Some of us think the best way to determine whether she was is that a jury sit and listen to all the evidence and then decide. Others think that this isn’t the best way and they just decide from reading newspaper articles. Soggy seems to believe that it’s somehow a draw, that one particular jury acquitted him and one convicted him. What he fails to mention is that 3 of the countries senior judges sat and decided that his original conviction was unsafe. His original lawyers have paid him a substantial amount of compensation based on their negligent defence. The first trial was clearly unsafe and his defence team incompetent. Once he received a fair trial, a proper defence, and the birds previous immoral behaviour came out, he was proven to be innocence. An innocent man, who has served time is clearly a victim. There’s no need to play judge & jury, as we have the real thing in this case. Judges decided his conviction was unsafe, a jury found him innocent. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

It was her third threesome in a few days. Was her drink spiked every time. You’re defending some dirty chick just because a white male was involved. She wasn’t some innocent that was taken advantage of. A FEMALE judge ruled that her sexual past was relevant in this case, it’s clear why that was. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

There was a bloke in the Kingsland who shouted “get up you black ****” when Keïta dived in the box second half. I wasn’t 100% sure that was what I heard, and as it was behind me wasn’t really sure who shouted it. Later the same voice shouted “black bastard” at Mane. That one was clear, and I was pretty sure who shouted it as there’s a bloke with a big gob who mouths off every week (although that was the first time I’d heard him use that sort of stuff). He also shouted “cut his head off” when Salah had the ball (not sure if this is acceptable, but I felt uncomfortable). To my knowledge nobody confronted him (including myself). I think most people were like me, unsure of whether he actually said it, and then unwilling to speak out as he sits with a bunch of blokes. All week I wrestled with it, wondering if I should have done something. Thursday I emailed the club asking what process they have if I witness this behaviour again. They advised pointing him out to steward. Fast forward to Saturday and the bloke wasn’t in his seat. Maybe a coincidence, but I can’t remember him missing a game previously. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pony. The jury decided the prosecution couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was incapable of consent. Unfortunately, you keep claiming that she wasn’t, you seem to think your opinion in more valid than 12 ordinary citizens. As for the witnesses. The judge in the first trial ruled that her past sexual history was inadmissible. The judge at the second trial used a rarely used exceptional reason ruling to allow it. The witness’ testified that they’d had a threesome with her days before Evans. Testified that the language she used to encourage them and the sex acts she asked them to indulge in, were exactly as Evans and his mate had said. There was also evidence that she’d had another threesome days after the Evans incident as well. This is the BBC correspondent’s take on it. “In rape trials, defence lawyers are banned from cross-examining an alleged victim about their sexual behaviour or history to protect them from humiliating treatment. But there can be exceptional reasons to ditch that rule in the interests of a fair trial. The Court of Appeal said Mr Evans's case was one of those very rare exceptions. It said that two other men who had sex with the woman had described their encounters with her in highly specific terms that were virtually indistinguishable from Mr Evans's own account of what had happened. One of the encounters occurred days before the alleged rape - and the other in the days that followed. On each occasion the woman had been drinking heavily and the sex occurred in a very specific way - including the words she used to encourage her partner. Each time she woke up saying she had no memory of what had happened. Lady Justice Hallett, one of the country's top judges, said that these events were so similar to what Mr Evans had described that a jury had to hear about them before deciding whether the woman had been incapable of giving her consent.” She obviously likes men & enjoys threesomes, there’s nothing wrong with that. In fact I wish more chicks were like it. However, she’s not the victim here, Evans is. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Soggy seems to have no compassion for the men falsely accused of this horrendous crime. I know of a young man who has now been on police bail for 5 months accused of a rape from 2 years ago. I know for a fact that plod have police statements (my daughter made one of them) advising that the bird has admitted to school friends that she consented and was annoyed that he subsequently dumped her. The accuser has even told her parents that she “regrets” it’s gone this far, yet the young lad still has it hanging over him as he prepares for his A levels. Evidently plod are still looking into it, despite the bird more or less admitting she lied, because they don’t want to be accused of not investigating it properly. All well and good, but the poor guy is suffering. There should be severe punishments for birds who try to ruin men’s lives in this way. Evans had his career ruined and I’m sure there’s countless others. Problem is people like soggy take believing the worst in white men as the default position. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Evans has now been paid 800k in an out of court settlement with his trail lawyers over their negligent defence. Interestingly, this has a Saints link, with former winger Stuart Ripley of law firm Brabners, being one of the two men who represented him. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Where’s the best Real ale. Went last season but as it was an early Sunday kick off, confined ourselves to the Wetherspoons. Going up on Friday with the snap dragon (thinking I was planning ahead) but she’s just announced “if you think I’m traipsing around Brighton Friday night to check out pubs for your sad mates, you’re very much mistaken “. ****ing women...... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I watched the first episode but found it a bit boring. Also felt it portrayed the Mccanns and their cronies too softly. They left their young children alone in a foreign country FFS. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The more games they have the better imo. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Oh dear Virgil..... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The Europa league via 7th spot is not a attractive proposition, even Burnley were glad to be out of it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You can’t kick people out that are in work. Therefore, if you believe there are too many EU nationals working in this country, who do you kick out. Drunker, Tusk, Barnier maybe? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Don’t talk rubbish man. Wolves & Watford as well as West Ham will have nothing to play for. Continue as they have been and Newcastle won’t by the time we go there. Boscombe won’t either, but the local element may make that tougher. We have an incredibly easy run in, with 7 of the last 8 very much winnable. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

If the people are unhappy with the number of Non EU migrants arriving, they can kick the Government out. What redress have they if they’re unhappy with the numbers arriving from the EU? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Pony. Most Brexiters just want brown people treated the same as Europeans. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk