Jump to content

John B

Members
  • Posts

    9,915
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John B

  1. I am a positive realist - the team is not good enough at the moment Mr Pardew agrees too http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4507949.Squad_long_way_from_being_ready_for_Millwall__says_Pardew/ When we have a decent squad I will be a lot happier
  2. Perhaps the Echo could find out further information. I could understand Tisdale turning down an interview but SFC would need to get permission to talk to him surely
  3. So Pardew is second best then. But I think I would probably have appointed him over Tisdale
  4. I am not sure that lots more goals are scored in League 1 from looking at last years tables but some teams at the bottom were really bad and let in more goals than we did in CCC
  5. Yes I quite agree with what Pardew is saying but I do not think at the moment we will get to the play off this season
  6. Not if they are no good;)
  7. What he said was he hoped to be in mid table by Xmas and would could be done then http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10280~1729716,00.html AS in OP
  8. In theory the squad is OK and it was last season But on the football pitch it is not
  9. Not so sure we dont seem to be playing well at the moment
  10. 383 for 7 What a joke
  11. The problem is that Pardew has not been good when teams start losing from what I have read on Charlton sites. I think it is the same with most managers Redknapp Pearson JP Wotte Lawrie Mac could not get Saints to perform well after a series of defeats so it is important that we start well
  12. Well I hope so otherwise we will be in trouble
  13. But we have lost Saejis Saga and Rasiak
  14. And Saints got promoted
  15. I agree surely if he has bought the club he wants to see it suceed and will spend sometimes. The creditors have been paid so what is the problem
  16. As we dont do very well I always hope England will do well instead but that does not happen very often But equal probably However 1966 was wonderful
  17. I agree but as a very sensible and knowledgable poster I still dont understand why you get involved as I have said before.
  18. Because some players are in contract I would have thought
  19. Sorry but I disagree you as sometimes quite agressive in your postings Perhaps confrontationally is not the right word. But I totally agree with the sentiments of your post to reserve the right to disagree with posters who attempt to rewrite history or to present conjecture as fact. Which is my point totally that is why I sometimes get involved because nobody can be totally wrong or even totally right. The past is the past and people have different slants on it there are so many ifs and buts. I still think that the way we were set up and because we had no significant backer and star players we were bound to be relegated from the Premiership
  20. But surely we have money to by a some decent players and we do not have to just have frees.
  21. I think they are all similar looking for confrontation.
  22. I agree It is like players trying to get others sent off not good.
  23. If he gets Murty then Two strikers at least one CB and Midfielder
  24. Lets face the only way we were going to prosper was with a rich backer. We have that now and a free stadium. So things will improve its a shame that Pinnacle bid because we have missed a month of team building
×
×
  • Create New...