Jump to content

Window Cleaner

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    32,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Window Cleaner

  1. should be like the Australian voting system; if you don't vote you get fined if they still do that.
  2. don't think you're quite right. Debt was converted into equity in June or July 2011 and showed up in the 2011 accounts published in March 2012. Since then we've been bagging more losses and have considerable debt..as shown in the accounts to June 2012; some 24 million in liabilities. No doubt we've paid most of that with this year's revenue but Gastn etc still aren't accounted for in those figures. http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/9618653.Saints_reveal_latest_financial_figures/
  3. what again ? wasn't that in 2011 ? 33 million debt for 33 million equity; how much are they in for now then?
  4. look again Southampton Football Club Limited is an Active business incorporated in England & Wales on 12th July 1897. Their business activity is recorded as Operation Of Sports Facilities. Southampton Football Club Limited is run by 4 current members. and 1 company secretary. 1 shareholders own the total shares within the company. It is also part of a group. The latest Annual Accounts submitted to Companies House for the year up to 30/06/2012 reported 'cash at bank' of £2,099,963, 'liabilities' worth £24,642,282, 'net worth' of £-49,794,007 and 'assets' worth £8,463,431. Southampton Football Club Limited's risk score was amended on 08/04/2013. this is before we spent money on Gaston; Maya;Mayuka etc.. We as likely as not have a shedload of debt
  5. Not the same branch of the family; this causes much confusion. Our branch does not make cranes or fork lifts or freezers.They have nothing whatsoever to do with SFC. That branch of the family is extremely wealthy but none of it comes our way. Not even a couple of euros in shirt sponsorship.
  6. We aren't debt free. I expect we have quite a lot of debt.
  7. doubt it; it's probably just about loss making season after loss making season. We've run out of ackers and someone somewhere doesn't want to give us any more. We were about 48 million down; won't have improved much on that so to fuel our ambitions we probably need some readys once again. We might break even next season or even get ahead a little but someone needs to underwrite the cash for the transfers we want to make this summer. The PL doesn't pay in advance.
  8. Short lived poll then; those with a job might not even get to vote, how shonky is that.
  9. Clyne has33 PL starts; no doubt 34 on Sunday;Rose 25 and he's done for the season.
  10. perhaps they actually want to take money out and there won't be enough to finance our ambitions.
  11. we need a top class striker; won't get much change out of 20 million for one of those. It is our prime need,no good just playing well, you need to concretise it with goals; the sort of goal that Lambert can't score as he so deftly showed yesterday. He sinks that and we're on our way to victory; muffs it and we have absorb more pressure.
  12. If Cortese's ambitions aren't to be met then the transfer window will be one way traffic..OUT. Morgan looked as if he was just waiting to put on his Arsenal shirt on Saturday anyway. Something rotten in the state of Denmark. Perhaps the players have had wind of this for a while; hence West Brom
  13. and in the spielge it says exactly why he's been included. Wigan played last week didn't they; against Swansea..
  14. But there seems to have been a lot of "rationalisation" in the Empire of the late Markus Liebherr, everything seems to have been consolidated or liquidated; I do wonder if there isn't some sort of fiscal problem.His main company is run jointly by Cortese and a Zurich liquidator; you'd have to wonder about that wouldn't you.
  15. looks like a rational enough view. We probably need to spend around 40 million this summer and probably don't have it all in cash in a drawer somewhere. The 'Trust' may well be happy enough to run the team we have now with a couple of sales to fund some minor additions and scrub along the bottom for the PL cash. Wouldn't think it's about day to day control. However of all the money 'invested' last summer we've only really had any value from JRod,Maya and Davis so far this season all the rest is latent at best or wasted at the worst. If I wasa Trustee I'd certainly question the purchases of Mayuka,Gazzaniga and Forren with the eternal question mark on Gaston..
  16. Hopefully not over selling our better players for some instant cash to pay back investment. We obviously have some big offers; NC obviously wants to tell them to f*ck off but the "Trust" might not see it that way. Weren't their rumours of intervention over AOC ?
  17. Strange seeing as the number of times it's been pointed out since about October that that game could well decide an entire season for 2 sides. Sort of last day Russian Roulette.
  18. In fact if we did lose 13-0 Stoke would have surpassed their entire season's away goal tally in a single game.
  19. who knows, a couple of them might be saying goodbye.
  20. side will be as per usual. MP wants to win.
  21. once again we would now be 10 th if Gazzaniga hadn't thrown away 4 points in 2 games. A rash and foolish experiment for which the perpetrator was duly dismissed.
  22. I put up the match for match comparison the other day. With today and from the same 15 opponents MP 18 points,NA 12.
  23. but Alpine is disrespectful to the players; can't have been easy for them to battle back from our abysmal start and have idiots like him slagging them off all of the time.
  24. yes if the following all happen Wigan win twice and Sunderland win as well. Fulham would need not to lose by a cricket score less than 11 or 10 if they score twice.If Wigan beat Villa by a single goal but Villa score 4 or more we could in theory go down by losing 12-0 at home to Stoke.
  25. absolutely. Bookies need those binky tenners to survive on you know.
×
×
  • Create New...