Jump to content

shurlock

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    20,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by shurlock

  1. Time for Goa and his PLA thugs to put the old boy out of his misery.
  2. Arguably there was a luiz foul in there. Did you see him hold Hoj?
  3. Luiz foul on Hoj there, preventing him from tracking Giroud.
  4. £60m+ in ‘talent’ there and we can’t scrape together one starter. That said wasn’t Moi injured?
  5. It’s the same back 5 that conceded 5 the last two times we played them.
  6. This.
  7. Make up for your big loss on Tuesday night pal?
  8. Precisely.
  9. And to think you were mocked for arguing Bournemouth was our level or comparator.
  10. Would he make us top 6 challengers again pal?
  11. The Washington Free Beacon
  12. :lol:
  13. Your understanding of the human condition is quite something, Gman, even if some of the posters on this thread have all the individuality and unpredictability of an ant.
  14. Agree. And the vacuum at the top of the club sends off all the wrong signals to the rest of the organisation.
  15. cheers.
  16. Are you claiming he’s had a meltdown based on him clearing his IG account (which could be for all manner of reasons) or do you have separate info that he’s had a meltdown?
  17. Failing that, I'll set up a go fund me page for Les as he seems quite concerned about my welfare.
  18. Well your post was poorly constructed then. It's reasonable to have concerns about potential benefit abuse but that doesn't explain the tone of your post. If your concern is about a few bad apples, then surely you wouldn't attack Corbyn's policies in blanket terms -as you did- and consequently throw the policy baby out with the bathwater. Rather you would accept the policy and deal with abuse on a case by case basis. To the extent you didn't, its hard to avoid the impression that you think fecklessness and idle poor are much bigger problems. As I said that's demonstrably false.
  19. Once again, you've failed to explain how and why redistribution ends up in the hands of those who want to do nothing. Its blindingly obvious that redistribution goes to the poor but why should it go to the feckless as Nick contends? There is no link - unless you think large numbers of the poor are also feckless. Its great having you back pal.
  20. Still not answered my question. Do you think redistribution will go to those who "just want to do nothing and hold their hands out". You do know what redistribution is and who it benefits? Keep running around in circles. I edit because my mobile has a tiny screen, so cannot always see my posts and typos. I also type on the go and have lost posts when leaving multiple browser windows open, so find it easier to reply (save) first, revise later.
  21. Do keep up Les - admittedly you're a bit rusty given your time away. Nick is against Corbyn's economic agenda which is fundamentally redistributionary -redistributing income/wealth from the rich to the poor. So who else is Nick referring to when he talks about the feckless?
×
×
  • Create New...