capitalsaint

thank GOD you guys are back. this place went wild when they heard you'd left. any update on bendtner's transfer? medical? fee?

Guys stop taking the ****. JustMike and Hypo are simply passing on the info they have been told, why do we have to get on everyone's backs just because they pass on info from a very reputable source within the club? Sometimes this board makes me so mad!!!!! Hypo, JustMike, on behalf of these jokers I apologise. Please don't leave the forum.

ITK? What do you and JustMike know? Tell us what you know.

What's your information???

I predict a loss. Obviously don't want one, but it feels a bit like the Liverpool game all those years ago.

You have literally no proof for that. Ridiculous statement.

I'd take either!

So he expects two more signings?

You mean let's hope one or two are wrong? The vast majority seem to love him...

no, he's an everton fan in liverpool with some very good connections it seems

i tweeted an hour ago asking the same. copycat.

Not so much a good point, but more added speculation. We have no idea if Gorkss wanted to come here, so how do we know what the reasons for the deal not happening are? Similarly, if nothing else, Cortese has shown that he is acting in Southampton's best interests. He isn't being a d*ck because he has a huge ego, rather he is trying to get the most money for our club. Briatore and Cortese are very different characters.

Yeah, probably better to assume everyone is lying than listen to people who've seen him play. I mean, since when have any of Tottenham's youth players failed to make the grade? Never.

Have you not been watching the news recently? It's about greed not need. I want three.

This thread ain't got nothing on the other one. Nothing.

Who cares about the player? The real tussle is between these two threads. Go team 'Ebanks-Blake'!

Now answer truthfully.

This has to be the first time I've encountered somebody actually backing up their argument with some facts. You'll understand if I take a while to respond, need to digest this info! Your point about 37% of men remaining in the bottom quarter seems to me (perhaps wrongly) to be quite positive. That means 63% of men born in 1970 got out of the lowest quarter. Isn't that a good thing?

Top post! Too many posters seem to think that these looters are representatives of the working class.

Could somebody explain to me the 'pampered rich' argument? The more you earn, the higher a percentage of your wages are paid in tax. If somebody wealthy is giving half of a portion of their earnings to the government, how are they more greedy than somebody on a lower percentage?

Where is your evidence for that? I'm happy to get real, but give me a little more to go on. From my own experience, I know absolutely loads of people whose parents were poor but have made it in life. From all sorts of backgrounds too- those who were poor and went to a grammar school, those who failed the 11+, I even know a guy who is now a copper, having been to Oxford despite none of his family ever finishing secondary school.

Because it's easier. Exposure to materialism mixed with a poor work ethic. It doesn't strike me as particularly strange- If you witnessed a murder, would you wait until establishing a motive before calling the perpetrator a murderer? I wouldn't. Causality and reasoning are not part of the definition, just the explanation. Simple stuff. Additionally, have you not read any of the other pages? Most of us have been discussing the reasons too...

St Marco for mayor!

As my idol, I wouldn't want to disagree with you, but actually Millwall have all of their firms in Eltham tonight. By all accounts they have actually managed to frighten off the would-be looters.

Well done for prefering to solve the problem pap. How are you doing that exactly?