EastleighSoulBoy

That is a lovely link for the Jimmy Gabriel goal, but 1974? I do not think so! Mods, why, when I try to use an apostrophe, do I open up the Quick Find (links only) tab in the bottom left of my screen?

google maps

And theirs!

Spot on Tim.

Is that the capital city?

Meh, the Burberry anusol is much better if you get the lines straight.

Who would lend the Skates the cash to pay the rent?

They may be having problems with their Corporate Processes but TSW seems to be having problems in locating their Corporate Ho! Any ideas why?

See you up The Otter?

Unfortunately you'll not be able to 'future protect' on any techie product, be it a TV, camera, phone, PC etc. The only real protection is not to look at anything after the product is delivered and installed!

judas1961 #4 26 Nov 2009 17:25 Complain | Signed: August 2005 re: re: Big club? ... Posts: 85 Trialist There are 10 clubs in the championship and 3 teams in league one who boast better average attendences tha PFC including dear friends Southampton. True, and what a choice of name for a poster!

Love it, could we pick the games from which we could get the 6 points? leeds A and Norwich A for instance? Oh! I thought not. Damn :smt093

Absolutely spot on! I can't see us being either promoted or relegated. It would be nice to be promoted but I'm still unsure whether we could stabilise without some additions/changes to the team.

I don't think the OP was making a criticism of you? More that it is a poor practice to cite a socially interactive web site as fact when we all know that anyone with a little nous can get into it and make anything appear as fact. It does tend to cloud the veracity of good work done by others such as your good self. Which is a shame.

No! They switched the heaters off, which prevent the falls from freezing!

During the 'heady days' (the last two close seasons) the echo would often use this forum for their 'facts'. Which was commented upon at the time. Let's face it, we've seen some rather 'factual' facts stated on here at times!

True and all will seem well until someone seeks to unsettle the lad. Let's hope that, if he has an agent, the agent is a decent one.

Indeed, I can even envisage the likes of Chelski, Manyoo etc each stumping up a vast amount of money to pay as a 'bond'. That money going into a pool that can be drawn down from by clubs who are financially mismanaged. Just like all the teams in the FL pulled together when Leeds, Rochdale, Luton, Stockport faced ruin. Oh! I dreamed that last bit. And the first bit, come to think of it.

Wow! you're one hell of a tough individual. Between the ears.

If he has known her 'since you was two years old' then he could only have known her for a year. You have an interesting, but fatally flawed, thought process for a three year old.

Meh, I can see them getting at least.....um......err......at least a....um..one point from that lot. If Burnley play really crap. Seriously, maybe a couple of draws at the most.

Indeed he is, so really them allowing him to play is all a load of bull. Maybe they will be happy to release him? If so why the change of mind? Maybe he is not what we thought he would/could be? I really don't know.

And their attitude will soon change should we progress to the third round, more so if we have to face them!

Having read some of the ungrateful comments on here I have come to the conclusion that things were better on here when we were close to going out of existence. At least we were bickering and having hissy fits over something sensible! Thank you Tonibell for your pictures, most of us appreciate them.

Three hours and fifty four minutes. That's some self control.