-
Posts
11053 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
Pamplemousse's Achievements
-
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
Jason Cundy speaking a lot of sense on Talksport. Obviously skate Jamie O'Hara with him was calling him Tonda a cheat and saying he got away with it but Cundy wasn't having any of it. "Who cares... he's not a cheat" -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
-
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
Yup, their names are at the start of the written reasons on the FA website -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
I wish we were playing Boro this weekend instead of the Skates We'll just have to smash them both and wait our turn for the bottle jobs to come down -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
Reading though the sanction document, the FA wanted to impose a ban of three months from all footballing activity and a hefty fine. (Paragraph 108) The Indepdent Panel told the FA to fuck off basically. -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
-
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
You're funny, I'll give you that -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
The very reasonable FA sanction just shows that the EFL decision was utterly ludicrous -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
Dragan Solak on the official website absolutely scathing about the EFL -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
https://x.com/FAspokesperson/status/2107848699694948505 -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
I've heard due to Saints leaking it earlier, the FA have changed their mind -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
It could explain the holdup in announcing it. The Disciplinary Panel were quite lenient and the FA appealed because they wanted a tougher sanction. -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
I'd be amazed if he escaped a ban - even a touchline ban - but appreciate the information. -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
The thing about an appeal being in secret is possible but it seems very inconsistent. Just been having a look at the FA decisions - most of the sanctions they announce are before any possible appeal. The one recent FA case where it was only announced after appeal was where Chelsea were breaking financial regulations. So I'm not sure if that was just a special case or if there was a specific reason. Even Man City's guilty verdict was announced before an appeal. I've been thinking that the delay in the decision was due to an appeal but the more I think about it, surely it would have leaked out by now. I genuinely think the club have no idea what's going on or when there will be an announcement. -
The Spygate Saga - 6 Week ban suspended for Eckert
Pamplemousse replied to St Chalet's topic in The Saints
Went down a bit of a rabbit hole on the FA website. This isn't the first time Tonda has been charged with the FA - he got done for being part of a mass brawl 5 years ago https://www.thefa.com/-/media/files/thefaportal/governance-docs/discipline-cases/2021/the-fa-v-stoke-city-fc-barnsley-fc-and-others-27-september-2021.ashx "TONDA ECKERT 23. We are unanimously of the view that TE’s part in this incident was the most serious. His behaviour was aggressive and violent from the moment that he confronted DH. He slapped DH and later had his arm around someone else’s throat. Therefore, we must take a higher starting point in his case. In his favour we take account of his previous good record, genuine remorse, and admission of the charge. Therefore, our starting point is a four-match touchline suspension and a fine of £4,125. Taking account of the mitigation and admission we reduce that to a three-match touchline suspension and a fine of £2,750." Hope that previous charge doesn't count against him, but it might do
