Jump to content

whelk

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    21,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by whelk

  1. Newcastle have a tough next game against Villa. Agree gum chewing is a good reason just doesn't beat Mike Ashley losing money for me though.
  2. It is definitely Plymouth. Impossible to be anyone else. Neither can move positions.
  3. Yeah can't believe people are debating points with such a plank.
  4. Our best hope of beating apathy of the young voter.
  5. Admire his clarity - he knows what he wants and how to get it. Clearly informed and worldly wise in the ways of contract negotiation. What I find staggering is how we have all been missing the simplicity of it all. We needn't have been Stoke all this time after all.
  6. Yes agree there will be that side as well. As Ranieri said yesterday - all 20 PL could spend millions next season. One will win league and 3 will go down. Such wisdom in the bleeding obvious
  7. Reassess Gaston? His contract expires FFS. Do think much bs about PL and what type of player can cut it. Obviously is a much higher standard but your promoted teams had a fair few players who probably not would think wouldn't be up to it but have been. Lots of players come good unexpectedly. See Mahrez
  8. I love that Leicester's achievement is going to pi ss all over so many who think there is a simple formula to success. Also blows Wenger's excuses. Don't expect the usual ones on here will take note and will still be wetting themselves over the summer come what may.
  9. Everyone has a black box these days. We need a rebrand.
  10. Some people are so cynical
  11. Burnley and Brighton. Nice to see Chris Hughton come up as Newcastle go the other way. Don't mind who for play offs. Soft spot for Hull but maybe because we always beat them and Steve Bruce always gracious in defeat. Although nothing in grand scheme of things doesn't the parachute money get redistributed to PL teams when those in receipt of it come back up. So we could paint another hashtag on the seats or something.
  12. Ok about 12 then.
  13. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2016/02/12/uefa-concerned-by-bt-sports-dismal-champions-league-viewing-figu/
  14. Considering I don't have a clue who you are that is very unlikely. The question is you seem a clueless fan more suited to supporting Man Utd or similar. Someone on the map like
  15. How old are you?
  16. Conclusive then. His dad won't let him play for us so a complete non starter
  17. They don't rely on keeping possession so would be well suited.
  18. I like the idea of assessing it. Q1 could be 'Do you give a sh 1t about representing the shirt?' And then note their answer Could also note number of badge kisses and fist pumps and award points for that and deduct if post a picture of a Mercedes on Twitter after a poor performance.
  19. Although not true
  20. The point of outrage is not so much the police being at fault but the cover up and smear campaign to divert blame. Why it has run for so long is this lack of acknowledgment by the authorities and the families fighting to clear their name and get to the truth. Beggars belief that so many don't get this when it is a absolute disgrace and still putting blame on the fans. So many respect and naively believe the authorities are always the good guys and can be trusted. As Burnham said South Yorkshire Police seem rotten to the core.
  21. You clearly don't understand and give it no context. Everyone looking to be outraged so throw up a quote and everyone can mock. Of course it has come from a Tory tiff which helps. Pathetic. But then most of this thread has been full of such crap. Hey the inventor of the engine must take some blame for that drunk driver that just mowed down that family.
  22. Your point? No fan of Cameron but are you trying to highlight him as a bad guy in this affair? His comments in 2012 we very strong in favour of the victim.
  23. You seem to have an obsession with the nature of football fans. Thatchereque. Pathetic and hard to believe so many agreeing with what is a crock of sh it
  24. Murdoch's papers may be for you then. Disgraceful ignoring on front pages of Sun and The Times. Only papers that have. 'the court case isn't going to bring them back' is a truly pathetic line. Do you not understand what this is about? Should they ave taken that approach at the start? And could have left it at The Sun's 'The Truth' front page poison and all moved on. Won't bring them back eh. You say you have fatigue of the story but appear to not have any understanding of what sort of cover up and smears have continued. It is huge news unless you are more interested in Cameron's WhatsApp story. It doesn't lessen the impact by mass coverage - ever thought you may be in a minority?
×
×
  • Create New...