badgerx16

Maybe; maybe 12 point crap defending, maybe we were clutching at straws all the time

Bradley Wright-Philips scored for Southampton FC against the Dingles from Burnley:cool:

OWTSGMI coming over loud and clear on Radio Lancashire

Get in !!!!!!!!

Believe ;)

Seconded :cool:

There's at least one black Friends Provident Saints sweatshirt being flaunted within spitting distance of Bloomfield Road as well ;)

Now I've got goosebumps :smt034

But Ormegod equalised

Oh well, another day older and deeper in debt.

Worryingly, it says that Rupes is leading the legal challenge against the FL

Prefer Bohinj myself, the mountains are higher !

TBH, if you post any sort of thread in TMS, you have a fair chance that the first two responses will be from S13 and RH; the former is a seriously 'one trick pony', who can only communicate in words of less than 5 letters, whilst the latter will agree with anybody who he thinks is being provocative by using the 'c' word, ( it's an alternative to having to be clever by your own means ). As far as I can work out, S13's answer to my request for people to give me positive ideas is that he 'cant' - that's on the basis that cint, and cont aren't in the dictionary.

Isn't this what they did to Leeds though ?

I don't think they can deduct points because we are challenging them, but I can see them witholding the 'golden share' that allows us to play in their sand-pit. I think the additional deductions would come in from financial irregularities or non-fulfillment of fixtures.

Lightweight midfield, no width, players on the wrong side of the pitch, no motivation, tactical naivity, can't defend set pieces, can't get shots on target..... Ideal for League 1, NOT !

These are the same comments where he let slip 'it was arranged this way to avoid administration' ? VERY diplomatic ;-)

19C and Alpine on the same side........

Don't p1ss on my parade, Arschloch

The title says it all Come on, reasons why it should be a 'bon anniversairre' ?

It can because Mawhinney is like Bernie Ecclestone with F1- he makes the rules up as he goes along.

Lacuna Coil - Spellbound :supz:

As asked on the main '10 point' thread : If SLH is solvent, as the FL state, why is it in administration ?

No win, no fee ?

If, as the FL imply, the holding company ( SLH ) is "solvent in it's own right", how can it have been placed in administration in the first place ? Surely the fact that the administrators have been brought in to manage the affairs of SLH, not the football club, and SLH's board have walked, would infer that the FL are taliking b0ll0x ? :smt102:smt102:smt102