badgerx16

I think we can all see where the money needs to be spent.

Che and AA have 4 between them in 2 league games. Obviously not going to do it at this level.

People aren't "happy" with Baz, and desperately want a competent keepr recruited, but castigating him even when he is actually blameless is lazy and unfair.

It does unmute but the commentry is BBC Radio Norfolk overlaid to the pictures

Apparently not; "Official guidance seen by The Independent states that applications can be withdrawn by the Home Office without the asylum seeker’s consent – even if it has been unable to contact them and does not know where they are, with a notification letter “served to file only”. Once removed from the system, people are ineligible for the housing and financial support offered to destitute asylum seekers, with a Tory MP warning they can then “disappear without a trace”. "Conservative MP Craig Mackinlay told The Independent: “This seems to be an amnesty by the back door and yet another loophole allowing many thousands of potential asylum claimants with or without a valid claim to just disappear into the underground economy without a trace.”

You may have missed the many, many, posts where is is made patently clear that I voted remain. As for name calling, I have been called a traitor, leftie, pinko, remoaner, thick northerner, racist, idiot, and a few I cannot recall just now. Grow up, sober up, or piss off. I don't care which.

Are you trying for a record - to piss off every poster on the forum ? For the record, I am tee total.

Is this you ?

Dilbert

One that shook me in the last few days is a video of 2 young women busking on a Ukrainian city street, an hour before they were killed by a missile strike.

And judging by his last few posts, lashed up on Special Brew.

Nowhere near as much as you appear to be.

And Donnie is totally incorruptible. Simply showing a still photo taken on the VP's plane without any context or corroboration from those present is hardly journalism.

And the 'Independent' Office of National Statistics is genuinely independent. Compared to pre-pandemic levels, the UK is the only G7 country whose GDP is lower today than before COVID.

Battalion

According to this report, whilst CO2 levels are far lower than they were 150 million years ago, ( as per GM's post ), there is no 'trend' of atmospheric depletion, as claimed, that indicates it would have fallen below levels necessary to support life. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/ But then again, NASA are Government funded, so obviously this data has to be treated with suspicion. 😉

More like a pig's trotter ?

OK, provide a list of names of those posters who, in your eyes, are not 'gammon'.

"My name is Adam Armstrong and I have a problem."

You are getting more confusing with every post.

Would you swim in our coastal waters ?

On the other side of the fence: "Take the 2015 video “The Truth about [Carbon Dioxide],” presented by Patrick Moore, whose title is “co-founder of Greenpeace,” and produced by Prager University. On the surface, it’s a well-made video about CO2, featuring sharp visuals and an authoritative voice presenting the information at hand from a source with “university” in the name. But if you were to watch the video more fully, some elements might appear strange. Moore spends much of the video talking about the origins of CO2 in planetary history, making sweeping statements and implications that environmentalists want to eliminate all CO2 and carbon to the last atom. He says fossil fuels are “100% organic” and “were produced with solar energy,” which is technically true, but clearly misleading for a non-scientific audience. He also makes the case that there should be more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, drawing allusions to CO2 levels during the Cambrian explosion literally hundreds of millions of years ago before humans even existed. He even questions CO2’s status as a pollutant at all. Moore does not mention the temperature increase on Earth due to recent carbon emissions or what that means for the planet, as he would have to explain why eras with higher CO2 emissions have temperatures several degrees hotter than pre-industrial times, or talk about the astronomical rise in emissions in just the last hundred years. This kind of video, filled with dubious scientific information, would be incredibly easy to spread across the Internet. In fact, it already has been spread, accumulating millions of views. Fortunately, there are some critical steps that we can take to minimize the impact of climate misinformation, should you ever come across a post on climate change you’re not 100% sure is legitimately sourced or reported accurately." https://climate360news.lmu.edu/how-to-tell-if-theres-climate-misinformation-on-your-feed/

Posting without proof reading is a sure sign of anger getting in the way of sense.

#10 doing the Hokey Cokey; Are we 'in' or 'out' ?

And many others are funded by the fossil fuel corporations. They are surely completely honest and above board.