-
Posts
25,409 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by badgerx16
-
But a Ministry of Defence source told the PA news agency the idea of using the navy was “completely potty” and could put lives at risk. “It is a completely inappropriate and disproportionate approach to take,” they said. “We don’t resort to deploying armed force to deal with political failings." “It’s beyond absurd to think that we should be deploying multimillion-pound ships and elite soldiers to deal with desperate people barely staying afloat on rubber dinghies in the Channel." “It could potentially put people’s lives at even greater risk." “Border Force is effectively the Home Office’s own navy fleet, so it begs the question: what are they doing?” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/priti-patel-migrants-channel-royal-navy-record-a9659346.html
-
The international law remains the same, refugees are supposed to stop at the first "safe" country they reach. Therefore Greece, Italy, France, etc. It is possible that the UK could shirk some of it's previous collective humanitarian responsibilty because it isn't bound to EU joint commitents to provide suport to the southern border states.
-
Has your mum bought you a new dressing up costume ?
-
Will you pray for him ?
-
In their view, a Christian / Muslim / Jewish believer has seen all the proof they need. You choose to reject it, which is your right. It does not further burden them with the duty to further prove anything to you.
-
Why do they have to prove anything to you ? Why are you so special ? What 'evidence' would persuade you that God existed ?
-
His appreciation of you is not conditional on you changing your beliefs or opinions, why are you obsessed with trying to persuade him to change his ?
-
I think RB is more 'open minded' than you.
-
Why not try out your arguments on this lot https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/westboro-baptist-church https://www.godhatesfags.com/
-
And your crusade is to point out to them the error of their ways ? Who appointed you to this auspicious responsibilty ?
-
Ahh, so you are asking philosophical questions to better understand their knowledge and beliefs ?
-
Not sure this will get very far; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53684033 "New York's attorney general has announced a lawsuit aimed at dissolving the powerful National Rifle Association over alleged financial mismanagement."
-
So you think it is your duty to go out of your way to taunt them ?
-
empathy /ˈɛmpəθi/ noun noun: empathy the ability to understand the feelings of another
-
Yes there is a difference, and I was not pulling you up on this, but that does not excuse your constant badgering ( sic ) of other posters with your 'loving God that massacres babies' and 'loving God that commits Genocide' posts.It is this that is disrespectful of other people's feelings and beliefs.
-
But you persistently diss people who believe He does.
-
He won't be the only one on here, and it doesn't necessarly excuse his attitude.
-
Once the claim has been demonstrably proven then belief becomes knowledge. belief /bɪˈliːf/ noun an acceptance that something exists or is true, especially one without proof. 'his belief in extraterrestrial life' trust, faith, or confidence in (someone or something). 'a belief in democratic politics' synonyms: faith, trust, reliance, confidence, credence, freedom from doubt, optimism, hopefulness, hope
-
Yet again; you may think that the Bible is a lot of old fairytales, and proof of nothing, somebdy else may think it is the the unadulterated word of God, and that it provides absolute proof of their deity's existence. Each of you is entitled to your opinion, you are each entitled to view the other as wrong, but neither of you will ever be able to prove that the other is wrong. In the opinion of the Believer, your request for 'external verification' is satisfied simply by opening your eyes and ears and wondering at God's creation all around you.
-
Just accept that some people do not subscribe to your views, that you may be wrong, and it is probably time to put this strand of discussion to bed because those at either end are entrenched and to try shift their positions is futile.