Batman

hard to argue. That game against Liverpool was just plain weird

I would, I want saints to keep their best players for the maximum amount of time. if they signed a deal less than 12 months ago (which no one forced him to) then unlucky son, you are staying

dont think they cheat. If the ref makes a crap decision and it is blown up in the press, easier to say he never saw it rather than be seen is incompetent.

he said something about the PGMOL or who ever they are putting pressure on refs to say there never saw an incident that is hot topic in the press so that the FA can take retrospective action. the ref regarding Aguero apparently never witnessed him elbow the west ham player, despite being right there.

how much is it return from Southampton to Stanstead?

Selling Pelle ensures a good spread every week at Staplewood

doesnt the food sell? IE, it turns a profit of some sort. (it better do for those prices)

‘Now I’m focused on Southampton. I’ve lots of targets: to play in the Champs League, to play in a World Cup, to win a trophy in England.’ sounds like he still very much wants out and no doubt, this will continue in the build up to the transfer window in Jan

they are weird going on about attendances when we always get more than them. At any level just weird

easy to spend when you receive vast amounts in player sales.

sherwood and hodgson are fans of the diamond

nets spends.?

as said, it is a race on what gets binned first the diamond or the manager. if Puel persists largely with this formation, he wont last much beyond xmas

as for not spending as we want to be sustainable etc again, not sure we are the only club who want/do that. yet they spend more out of their pockets than we do

pochettino IMO then, adkins in the championship

basically, it is going up £15m-20m every 12 months. despite being middle of the road wages and a significant minus net spend for the last 2-3 summers I think Les Reed needs to explain this immediately otherwise we could go pop

so, why do you reckon we seem to need to operate with a hefty negative net spend every summer when others (much smaller with bigger debts) seemingly do not?

2 years ago, the 'net debt' was £48m, very middle of the road. according to the Guardian

where is the money going that means we have to have regular negative net spends to get by when no other club does what is it that makes us different?

because if all clubs have running costs, we are back to the original question as saints are no different

isnt that the same for all clubs though?

Walcott v Luton was a beauty too

what else? Delap was a corker

every team pays agents fees.

why?