Guided Missile

Christ, it must be national diarrhea day...

Another pointless turd of a post...

So English is your first language, but your not very good at reading. Glad that's settled...

What a pointless turd of a post...

The brightest news amid all this rain is the sight of a magician failing to make the water disappear, in this video.

How would you describe the method they were placed in a position of power on your planet, then?

As English is obviously not your first language, it might be worth pointing out that your leaders in the Green Party are actually calling for the removal of democratically elected ministers from the cabinet. The clue was the hippies describing them as "senior government advisers and ministers".

Latest from the total nutter's involved in climate lobbying. Called for a purge???? Let's see if anyone on this thread has the nerve to defend this....

Adapt...

Actually, the basic premise of your post is totally wrong: Key statements from the IPCC AR5 WGI Chapter 2 on extremes. Here are a few: “Overall, the most robust global changes in climate extremes are seen in measures of daily temperature, including to some extent, heat waves. Precipitation extremes also appear to be increasing, but there is large spatial variability" "There is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables since the mid-20th century” “Current datasets indicate no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century … No robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin” “In summary, there continues to be a lack of evidence and thus low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale” “In summary, there is low confidence in observed trends in small-scale severe weather phenomena such as hail and thunderstorms because of historical data inhomogeneities and inadequacies in monitoring systems” “In summary, the current assessment concludes that there is not enough evidence at present to suggest more than low confidence in a global-scale observed trend in drought or dryness (lack of rainfall) since the middle of the 20th century due to lack of direct observations, geographical inconsistencies in the trends, and dependencies of inferred trends on the index choice. Based on updated studies, AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in drought since the 1970s were probably overstated. However, it is likely that the frequency and intensity of drought has increased in the Mediterranean and West Africa and decreased in central North America and north-west Australia since 1950” “In summary, confidence in large scale changes in the intensity of extreme extratropical cyclones since 1900 is low” So, I intend to carry on as usual. It would greatly add to my entertainment if you and the rest of the climate change alarmists would do the same. "The End is Nigh, Unless We Repent" b0ll0x you lot spout is hilarious....

In 2012, The Environment Agency carried out a study on the cost of a national water network.It will look at the implications of creating a system to pump water from wetter, western parts of Britain via pipes, canals and rivers to the drier east. The Institution of Civil Engineers says the idea should be taken seriously, as it would offer one answer to summer shortages. Professor Roger Falconer, from the institution, thinks existing reservoirs in North and Mid-Wales could be enhanced as a source of the water. Another bunch of nutjobs proposing to spend billions in the name of climate change, this time piping water from Wales to the Bristol and Thames areas, which will be in drought due to climate change. Thank **** they didn't get away with that...

Fast forward to today, the Independent is reporting this: The wacky professor from Reading further states: My message for politicians is to ignore academics like you, mate, who are armed with worthless modelling equations and who obviously played too many computer games in their bedroom, when they were at school...

Meanwhile, way back in 2012, the Guardian was reporting this: .....climate change could mean drought is "the new normal" .....

Prince Charles....

Pompey's Accounts up to 30th June, 2013 (After 2 months Trading) Profit & Loss [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]19 April 2013 to 30 June 2013[/TD] [TD=align: center]£[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]TURNOVER[/TD] [TD=align: right]370,078[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Cost of sales[/TD] [TD=align: right]169,019[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]GROSS PROFIT[/TD] [TD=align: right]201,059[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Administrative expenses[/TD] [TD=align: right]590,043[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]OPERATING LOSS[/TD] [TD=align: right](388,984)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Interest payable and similar charges[/TD] [TD=align: right]124,677[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]LOSS ON ORDINARY ACTIVITIES BEFORE TAXATION[/TD] [TD=align: right](513,661)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Tax on loss on ordinary activities[/TD] [TD=align: center]0[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]LOSS FOR THE FINANCIAL PERIOD[/TD] [TD=align: right](513,661)[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Balance Sheet [TABLE=width: 500] [TR] [TD]at 30 Jun 13[/TD] [TD=align: center]£[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]FIXED ASSETS[/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]lntangible assets[/TD] [TD=align: right](238,985)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Tangible assets[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,667,373[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Total Fixed Assets[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,428,388[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]CURRENT ASSETS[/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Stocks[/TD] [TD=align: right]11,049[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Debtors[/TD] [TD=align: right]11,580,209[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Cash at bank and on hand[/TD] [TD=align: right]2,881,391[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Total Current Assets[/TD] [TD=align: right]14,472,649[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]CREDITORS:Amounts falling due within one year[/TD] [TD=align: right]10,246,414[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]NET CURRENT ASSETS[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,226,235[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES[/TD] [TD=align: right]7,654,623[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]CREDITORS: Amounts falling due after more than one year[/TD] [TD=align: right]4,266,284[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Total Current Assets[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,388,339[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]CAPITAL AND RESERVES[/TD] [TD][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Called-up equity share capital[/TD] [TD=align: right]39,020[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Share premium account[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,862,980[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Profit and loss account[/TD] [TD=align: right](513,661)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS[/TD] [TD=align: right]3,388,339[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] So the question is, when will Pompey be forced to raise yet more equity from the plucky high net-worth (or, currently much lower net worth) investors, sell-up or, more likely, call in the receiver again. My guess is that as they are probably losing around £250K a month and as it is 6 months since these accounts were compiled, they probably have about one and a half million in shareholders funds left. I'm thus going for administration at the end of the season. Unless anyone is willing to come up with another £3-4 million to gamble on making the dizzy heights of league one by 2015-2016, when they will likely to be only losing slightly less money. Of course, I could be wrong and they could be currently making a healthy profit on their 15,000 crowds in League 2.

Half of those live close to the away ground. Just like us, really...

The truth about the BBC regarding their "climate change" bo££ox is here... What a disgraceful use of taxpayers money and led by that ageing eccentric "luvvie", Sir David Attenborough...(famous quotes: "..humans are a plague on Earth", "We say, get the United Nations to send them (Ethiopians) bags of flour. That’s barmy") The BBC, home of peodophiles, nutters and sex pests, funded by you and me...

I have an answer for you, George. The extreme cold weather you are experiencing is due to global warming, aka climate change. I know this, because organisations such as the BBC, the Met Office and the Guardian have told me. Luckily, their part in the greatest con since the start of the industrial revolution is now being exposed. The BBC here in the Telegraph: The Met Office here in the Times: The Guardian:

Lovely to see the academics disappearing up their own ar$e$ with a "heuristic" approach to climate change. For those remotely interested, that involves deriving an expression they can get their heads around that can approximate a set of circumstances so complex, that they have no hope of modelling with their puny brains. Meanwhile, the Met Office continues to falsify the data their crap models rely on, here.

Reminds me of an exchange with one of our wonderful expats on this forum: 14-01-2009

I think the head is quite realistic, TBF...

Too much time on my hands...

...I know exactly the artist for this job...

I think this is the image showing the lovely Kora Blagden clutching the season tickets to her heart: A classy broad and wonderful mother... ...and more PR gold for Pompey!

Just a reminder of the crock of sh !t, so many swallowed at the time, with Legg swallowing harder than most... I can only imagine the hard-on, um pahars and Wes Tender are getting, just reading it again... Less than 3 years after this we were in administration. The only reason we got out of the sh !t, was that the structure Lowe et al had put in place, was so attractive to an investor. Otherwise we'd be playing Pompey in League 2