sadoldgit

over

woohooooo

What do you think about Taylor's commets about Hillsborough?

Agreed. Nothing more than verbal handbags really. Apparently Ronaldo has given Bale grief twice recently when he chose to shoot instead of pass. Footballers and their egos eh? By the way, I think Osvaldo IS an @rse.

Not sure how you can reach the conclusion that Evans will "probably" be aquitted and why should the CPS "pull" the case? They had a successful prosecution.Their job is to get the case to court and to get a conviction which they have done. Anything else is up to the courts and legal process.

Unsure about Jimmy Carr He has good material but just comes across as a smug @rse with a laugh like a constipated seal.

Loved theCarry On films and still laugh at them now.Strangely the "new wave" of comedians did a Carry on film (Carry on Columbus?) back in th 80s and it was totally unfunny.

I have never said that I dont think that Evans is not entitled to seek employment and technically and legally there is nothing preventing him playing professional football again. There is quite clearly though a huge moral issue surrounding this and one that Taylor would have done well to heed.

My point is that all supermarkets seem to be heaving at Christmas so what is the point in advertising at that time of year? I didnt make my choice based on an advert. I made my choice on locality and the fact that I saved a few quid. I appreciate that they all fight for market share at Christmas but I dont think a clever ad makes the slightest bit of difference.

So you think he should stand up and say no matter what Evans did and no matter the public outcry, he should be allowed to ply his trade again? If he was a teachers union rep he wouldnt have a leg to stand on. Perhaps he should have counseled Evans on how to conduct himself to give himself the best chance of getting a job when he came out rather then letting him carry on digging a hole for himself?

Eek, who is he stalking?

He has but way too late. Still we have done this to the nth degree. Completely different circumstances. If McCormick had had the same accident but without drink involved would you still think he should be treated the same as Evans? There are people who cause death by dangerous driving every day who havent touched drink or drugs - in fact tiredness causes poor reactions in the same way that alcohol does. McCormick will have to live with these deaths on his conscience for the rest of his life. Evans still thinks he did nothing wrong so only probably is worried about not making a mint kicking a ball about again.

Sainsburys have posted their worst Christmas figures for 10 years. Not suggesting it was anything to do with the ad but perhaps they would have been better off spending the money on a few high profile loss leaders to get punters though the door? I shopped in Tescos this year but only because a) they are closer b) I have a load of vouchers and c) they were giving 25% off three bottles of wine or more. I couldnt even tell you what the Tescos ad was all about (apart from being Christmassy)!

buttocks

We have a winner for post of the year already!

Is it? If loads of kids have your name on the back of their shirts or prentend to be you in the playground that kind of means that you are held is some kind of esteem, no? As for McCormick, perhaps Evans could have taken a leaf out of his book when he came out of the nick? He has only just started to make the right noises (and only because he has finally realised that his attitude is working against him). He and his mates have caused the victim even more grief and he has only just said that he regrets what she has gone through. The bloke is a total @rse.

So does Bruce know that it did go at appeal and that appeal was not upheld? The current review process is not an appeal. They talked about this on Talksport tonight. Most managers had the sense to dodge the question (Wenger didn't see it) but Bruce has put his size 9s right in it. He might not be a rape apologist but he is certainly guilty of making himself look a total ***t.

Argh, another effin typo. Misconduct.

I never really read my works contract but aren't their articles about your employer being able to terminate your employment if you found guilty of serious conduct??? Going back to Evans, was there a problem with him being a plumber or electrician though? I thought his issue was more about him being in the public eye and a role model?

Not serious. T*tty w@nks on the other hand are a grey area. No penetration but you would have to say it was more than holding hands.

Professional sports people are a privileged breed. They get paid (often very well) for doing something most of them love and most of us would do for free. I wouldnt fill shelves at Tescos for nothing but would have happily played for SFC fr nowt if I had been good enough (subsidising my wages by filling shelves at Tescos of course). The more I think about a code of conduct the more think it is a good idea. It would stop all the nonsense we have had about Evans, McCormack etc and people would know where they stood.

Defense lawyers are also paid to defend their clients but many will advise their clients to please guilty if they think they are and will get convicted. Defending a rapist is defending the indefensible. He could argue that Evans has paid his debt and deserves to be able to play football again - but he might have been better off advising Evans to apologise and show some remorse (which has only just happened, long over due) and to get his buddies to take that offensive website down.

The police and CPS felt there was enough evidence to charge both with rape. He was charged and found not guilty. The "falsely" can only come after the verdict. Frankly I think he was lucky he didnt end up sharing a cell with his buddy.

Anyone would think that the "Devil Woman" had never been written!

Sun