OldNick

You have never been the most observant

pic.x.com/jQU4OHv84d

I have now watched their keepers interview on X and he clearly says he doesn't know why it was disallowed. So I believe its QED, Armstrong had no input into the goalkeepers view

Subjective decision, exactly what we are debating about last night. Still shouldn't oversee a 9-0 defeat as we were down to 10 men

No we were both talking about his run and if the keeper was affected. Watch the video and you will see their keeper (rightly so) is watching Frazer

I would think it is fair to say that RH had the advantage of a club that had 10 years experience of the PL, and so very good players. I myself feel that the humiliation of 9-0) is worse as I understand the limitations of the squad and also the run of bad luck with VAR

Well at the moment the ball is kicked the keeper is looking at Frazer. You can go around in circles trying to make your point but IMO he is not impaired by Armstrong. The keeper even has reportedly said so in an interview

Well at present he hasnt overseen 2 yes 2 9-0 defeats. Ralph is overrated, I just despair thinking about the FA cup semi final and the absoute rubbish performance he oversaw.

2 things. Their goalkeeper after the goal made no complaint and apparently has said in an interview he didnt know why the goal was given as offside, and they got away with one

So he may have but at an angled run as he ends 6 ft to the side of the goal.

I still believe we were right getting rid of him, but the choice to replace was poor

That is fair CB, although I doubt like me you know/think of one who would come and change our fortunes at this moment in time. The Aberdeen manager is doing well but like most I doubt he wants almost certain relegation on his CV It looks to me that the players are not downing tools as they did with a few of our previous managers

Well you think he's a poor manager, so a subjective viewpoint. Iam not fully in the in or out camp with him, but I know your previous history with people at Saints that if they give you the wrong glance you are at them and niggling away. I dont care for the tippy tappy football , and Peps version is dull for long periods but I support the team and can see that we are hamstrung with a top Championship squad trying to survive in the PL. If you seriously believe Potter, whose stock is still high is going to risk it at a team that 95% certain to go down, then you the most 'boat-rocking' fan we have, then good luck to you in your fantasy world. If Potter comes then I will be more than happy to come on here and with capital letters offer a grovelling apology to you. Something I very much doubt that you would do with your own thoughts of your own grandeur

We are not relegated yet, probably will be but.. Now tell us who you think should come in?

It is a nonsense, and a waste of time. If the ref said he thought it was Armstrong interfering then they only had agree that not whether Archer was.

Yes without VAR but once it was proved Archer was onside the decision to then penalise Armstrong was wrong. It seems the majority of non Saints fans feel we were done

well he is a useless keeper if he is looking at Armstrong instead of Fraser who is crossing the ball, it is all subjective I believe it was a bad error by the officials that has cost us.

If os why spen 4 minutes checking whether Archer was offside

He was looking at Fraser , his defender was more in his vision.

But if the ref has he was interfering and so that doesnt matter about Archer off or on

ANother thig, if the ref knew he was going to disallow it for interfering why did he let it go to VAR?

No I dont think it was then, I feel it was after we had signed Armstrong

But they cleared it as onside re Archer, and I suspect the lino gave Archer offside and so wrong.

were you on VAR last night ? Centre of the goal lol

There would be Breaking News on Sky if this list was about Liverpool or Man Utd, reporters at the ground and hour long programmes on Five Live