OldNick

Of course not Lol.

The day we went into administration he lost all he had invested/owned in his 6% shareholding.

I believe he will be lending the club money with safety guarenteed.If we are to to get on our knees in gratitude it should have been more to that old girl who walked up to the club and GAVE over £500 to the club to try and help save us some weeks back. Yes LC has loaned some money but should we now get the prayer mats out everytime his name is mentioned.Ok Ottery reaches for the Kleenex each time he sees a picture but he is no better than any of the people who are giving free time saturday etc.

Well if you dont think he lost any money then I wouldnt like you to guide me.

People dont want to think it could be anyother persons fault except RL. They of course could be right but i dont believe RL would have acted as it has been portrayed as he loves his money and recklessly putting us into administration was to cost him it all.he would have sold players in Jan if he knew his money was in jeopady.It doesnt ring true.

I have just gone and had another look at the picture and you are right he doesnt look smug. Perhaps uncomfortable in his pose.

Especially what led up to the decision at Barclays.

You lot just dont get it do you? Every time a picture comes up of Rl etc you get loads of comments about ruddy faced duck shooter , smug look bas#### etc but anybody dare be slightly observant about one of the untouchables and it is herasy. lol

That is the questions we should be aiming at Fry at barclays. I would like to know the circmstances of why he bounced cheques when he did.

i respect Leon Crouch a great deal but I expect it comes with watertight guarentees.He has lost enough he doesnt deserve to lose more.I hope he stays as a fan only Did anybody else thing the echo's picture make him look a bit smug?

The concept is just to much for you to grasp.

Lol

Sorry ,but as grateful as i am I think he should not have a place at the clubs board .He is part of the old guard and all that has gone on.I dont think he would be able to work as part of a team as he would rightly wish to run things his way.A powerful personality becomes too overpowering IMO I expect there strings attatched to his loan ie guarentees.

A lot of supporters alienated themselves IMO. You were gagging for us to go into administration telling us it was the promised land as we would be bought as we were such a bargain.It doesnt feel like that from where im sitting. it is foolish mindsets like that that has contributed to our demise.Add to that Rl MW LC abd all the others and you have the set.

I only can tel you what I found out. The people were adamant that the wages gp out 4th thurs in the month and couldnt understand why the 3rd thurs has been stated!

Claphams post earlier made me feel better.He was posting from the administrators point of view and he eased my concerns

I dont know if it is possible but the players registrations may be able to be held or quickly sold before liquidation.Only a guess

but can the administrator keep the p[layers registration? even shortterm as they are under contract.Therefore he would sell qucikly before we go into administration.The other thing I have gleaned is that the wages go out on the 4th thurs in the month and so why have we been told they go out this week????

If somebody pays 6m+ for the stadium , Jacksons farm and our part of staplewood would add a bit more.Holding back and selling the players in a firesale would add more.it would soon get to far more.

Perhaps, it is only when he is provoked that I believe he oges over the top.I have been the victim of it myself so i do know how he can act at time

Perhaps they were at a good price to give some free publicity but alos showing advertisers how effective they are.

I dont know if that is the case but if he is he certainly knows how to get under some peoples skin very easily.You watc hhim make a very fair assessment and loads pile in to have a go, wheras others say similar and it is left alone.

Excuse me, Stanley and myself have a very friendly relationship IMO whilst me and Alpine have a good understanding, he is wrong and i am always right, it is only when he vies away from that track do we fall out. ps he is negative and if we had a poll it would pan out that way. Alps is ok anyway

Lol, I know what you mean but he does put some good points across at times.I understand where you are personally coming from but for the average debate he adds some spice.We dont want to go too middle ground.I liked scooby anyway as he really knew how to turn thre knife and get people going.It was amusing seeing the bites

why is he not allowed as he is perceived a RL sided poster and the really negative posters are given free reign.It is a forum for all opinions I thought.As long as he is not abusive let him speak