OldNick

Scooby I do realise that this is all a figment of your imagination, but landed gentry and old money are f####d as they are Lloyds names and potless. We need the brash diamond encrusted Rolex wearers, who dine out on expensive wines , who have ex porn star model wives, new money who dont care if they lose 50m

wish it was his money and then he could buy us out.

From the information I have just had through to me Svennson will be playing if selected.

you aren't a friend to go out on the town then. Your tipping is a bit on the high side though.

If you are blind to the situation the club is in ,there is no helping you. You have been back on and already you have told us the Svennson's knee has popped and that the club should go into Administration to keep a goalscorer that had a tally of 3 goals last season.

You have been overdosing on those stupid pills again. There are only so many times it needs explaining.

Sadly as the past posts are lost you will have to take my word for it. I and a few others questioned how good he really was and did say at the time will he be as good after he had earned a contract.

BWP fits in wioth the system better than the other 2

IF Saga is so good he will soon score so many goals in Denmark that there will be a host of clubs lining up to buy him from us.We will then bank the fee and might get a striker on loan....or he will score the odd goal and he will return to see out his contract. Now which PLan do you think it will be Plan A or Plan B?

Well your theory is dead in the water as you qualify it with IF Saga scores. IF MCG scores 50 he is worth £10m IF Lallana scores 50 he's worth 10m. The fact is Saga scored 3 goals last season, the only time he looked useful was when he was playing for a contract (even then I was not convinced) so tell us how he all of a sudden is going to be a prolofic striker in this league.Afterall he had the whole of Europe to snap him up and where did he end up Denmark!

Are you just trying not to understand or dense. Any business that is failing to gain the banks support you have to show you are attempting to trim costs. Saga is a way of cutting costs. You have lost this debate and so are trying to wriggle.

YES the banks are losing money/or were, we are paying now. They wish to look deeply at any company whose overdraft is rising or at its limit.They want to see the company activily cutting costs not sitting on their hands as you would do. I find it incredible that somebody who doesnt watch a player becomes an expert on how good he is.

you are the one trying to fudge your stupid arguement that its ok to go inot administration. If you are losing 300k a week to offload someone who is on 15k helps let alone all his add ons and of course us receiving a loan fee. I wouldnt want you to be in charge of a budget.

I think you dont have to have a Paypal account by just pay by the system

This is the MUPPET section where it is to have a joke and laugh. You cheapskates are tetchy. I didnt realise that the subscription thing would be such an issue.We are all different and look at things differently. Its like when you go out for a group meal there is always someone who says 'I only had a soft drink, and so I should only pay £6.36 ' Whilst everyone else is happy to chip in.

I dont go on any other forums as this is by far the best and Iam happy to pay £5 to keep this one going.If you are happy having adverts and pop ups that are annoying to save you a fiver that's your perogative.

You have not addressed the 300k a week loss.That means all avenues are open for selling players,and obviously the big earners are prioritised. Selling/giving away the young blood saves very little. As for you happily going into administration......

Alpine thinks that going intoadministration is fine.He doesnt factor in the uncertainty the morale sapping -10+ points and all of a sudden Rasiak andSaga are going to start scoring shedloads of goals. Rasiak is probably the laziest forward I have ever seen and yes he scores goals but he is so greedy he doesnt provide any chances for others.Therefore you get a forwardline scoring 20 goals.

I didnt realise he had a rival site, and so is a tad put out.

I will not fly with any airline that has a tie up wit AA. The risk flying is enhanced in my opinion

We can move to that, do what the politicians do float the idea and then go for the kill when people are already expecting it.

Paranoid or what. This is fun and entertainment as well as being informative.To me not having the gross adverts is worth a fiver a year.I pay to watch footballers who drive around in baby Astons and Im certain the boys who run the site are a long way from getting one of those from the proceds of thois site.As for the Ltd company I suggest it is prudent as they dont want ot be sued for some of the terrible accusations put up on this site.

You just cant help yourself, but it was a good one Alps

yeah but we love the cheapSkates really.They will in the main hold their hands up and subscribe, for the life of me I cant see why they dont.

I think you will find the Bournemouth thing is not a good example.The former chairman etc only got back in by default. The administrators charges were obscene as well. Staying at the Chewton Glen!!!