Saint Without a Halo Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 follow the link! http://www.skysports.com/story/0%2C%2C11096_6362092%2C00%2Ben-USS_01DBC.html Apologies if posted elsewhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silversaint Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 Lovely Stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doddisalegend Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 follow the link! http://www.skysports.com/story/0%2C%2C11096_6362092%2C00%2Ben-USS_01DBC.html Apologies if posted elsewhere! Ouch would be nice not to be be the butt of media jokes and scorn just once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 Bloody hell, NC is NOT going to be happy. I hope he doesn't try to take on Sky now, as they own our website. I'm sure they'll have no issue taking it down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jam Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 Doesn't actually say much though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horley CTFC Saint Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 And Sky has no axe to grid does it.......does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horley CTFC Saint Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 And Sky has no axe to grind does it.......does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 Just a bit more Murdoch propaganda, nothing to see here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 all true though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 follow the link! http://www.skysports.com/story/0%2C%2C11096_6362092%2C00%2Ben-USS_01DBC.html The author starts off in 'sensationalist conjecture' mode before concluding that "other more understandable factors" (or words to that effect) may be involved in Pardew's departure. Nothing new to see here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowan Gorilla 5 Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 What a load of guff. "If nothing else works a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 One thing that they haven't mentioned, is that neither Pardew nor the LMA have said anything about the sacking. Which rather suggests that there has been agreement reached about non-disclosure of what has happened. This is usually to the benefit of the employee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadhall Saint Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 Yawn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jam Posted 7 September, 2010 Share Posted 7 September, 2010 One thing that they haven't mentioned, is that neither Pardew nor the LMA have said anything about the sacking. Which rather suggests that there has been agreement reached about non-disclosure of what has happened. This is usually to the benefit of the employee. Do you mean the big fat pay off which would be put in jeopardy if AP spoke to the media? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now