1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well done you useless ****s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 i was waiting for a thread along these lines. What use is this? You not got enough reasons to moan? Change the bloody record Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well done you useless ****s. ... in a defence that has conceded three goals! Who are the useless ****s you refer to? The other Watford defenders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 **** off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 I will take the view of an ex top pro ahead of yours any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Fine replacements in Gasmi and Pulis. Just need a few more months to Gel and find their fitness and accomodation and make freinds and get their sat navs working and well..you know what I mean...little patience and they will cum good eventually and we will not miss corkey after it was all messed up and... Oh! yeah three points sometime this month ..please, Lowey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 **** off lol what a helmet. Anger issues as well as deluded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Not really SS. Your initials are appropriate,are you a Nazi who would like to eradicate all dissent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well done you useless ****s. to be expected,he was outstanding for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Saints 'didnt want him enough' In todays game i suspect it means we didnt want to pay a kings ransom for him, where Watford did. The fans showed they wanted him and so he snubbed us as much as he did the club. He would never be a Saints player as long as he has a whole in his ..... He looks good but there is a common thread he played for S****horpe -relegated , he played for us looks like we may well be and now Watford are in the mix, strange game football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Cork never did fit into our team anyway,because he could tackle,hold the ball up,pass to another team member and he had passion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Comes back to the common theme of false economy Nick. Lowe has been practicising it all season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 4 conceded. One player doesn't make a defence. A decent bit of organisation would help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Saints 'didnt want him enough' In todays game i suspect it means we didnt want to pay a kings ransom for him, where Watford did. The fans showed they wanted him and so he snubbed us as much as he did the club. He would never be a Saints player as long as he has a whole in his ..... He looks good but there is a common thread he played for S****horpe -relegated , he played for us looks like we may well be and now Watford are in the mix, strange game football. he could be the new quashie :-) hasnt he been relegated about 86 times? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Comes back to the common theme of false economy Nick. Lowe has been practicising it all season. Snore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 (edited) Comes back to the common theme of false economy Nick. Lowe has been practicising it all season.I would rather him have stayed but we dont know what the wages loan fee was to be. You have to face up to the fact that the club is just about in the category of a Big Issue seller. As soon as there was a contest for his services we were always going to come second. Cork cannot say he was not given a wonderful reception by the fans and so his words about not wanting him ring hollow to me. I want Jan gone and RL is making a bad mistake not doing so.I cannot support his reasoning on that, but i do support him trying to cut our cloth. Edited 9 January, 2009 by OldNick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 he could be the new quashie :-) hasnt he been relegated about 86 times?seems so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 No doubt Himmler you are thoroughly excited about the way things have gone this season. Nice. I'm as happy as the next bloke, but Cork has gone, not coming back this season. So deal with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Hope you are looking forward to Southamptons own Kristalnacht at the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Hope you are looking forward to Southamptons own Kristalnacht at the end of the season.The night of the long knives may well be first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 The time is shortly coming when Lowe will not be able to set foot in this city ,let alone SMS. It is going to get ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Im sure Lowe is quaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 The time is shortly coming when Lowe will not be able to set foot in this city ,let alone SMS. It is going to get ugly.Its 11 men kicking a bag of wind against 11 mercenaries from another town. We are old enough to understand that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1965onwards Posted 9 January, 2009 Author Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Yes we are Nick,but we both know that there are others who look on things differently,and they are not afraid to act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southamptonfclegend Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 TBH it was obviously his choice to go to a team who lose to Reading we don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 I will be doing my best to get anti Lowe chants going at Barnsley tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 I will be doing my best to get anti Lowe chants going at Barnsley tomorrow. Hero, that'll help the lads out on the pitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 I will be doing my best to get anti Lowe chants going at Barnsley tomorrow. Well done Stanley. But if i were you i would save your energy until our next game at SMS.It will have more impact and Lowe will be more likely to be there. Also i can join in. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well done Stanley. But if i were you i would save your energy until our next game at SMS.It will have more impact and Lowe will be more likely to be there. Also i can join in. LOL. Home games aren't an option for me i'm afraid. I've not been all season and i won't go again until Lowe and Wilde are gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Hero, that'll help the lads out on the pitch How many times over the last three seasons have we heard the old saying "Get behind the lads" etc. Its worked well so far hasnt it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 How many times over the last three seasons have we heard the old saying "Get behind the lads" etc. Its worked well so far hasnt it? And getting rid of Lowe worked well eh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scudamore Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 What time exactly did you start drinking tonight 1965onwards? You seem a little cranky... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 And getting rid of Lowe worked well eh Well Crouch actually put money into the club. Lowe has only ever taken money out. You decide who was the better Chairman. Though i think Wilde and the executives he brought in were a disaster. But who then got Lowe back into Saints? Would you trust Wilde? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 think he meant singing never got rid of Lowe, there hasn't been any anti lowe chants yet but even if they build over the next few months he won't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 meant both meanings of it really FWIW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarniaSaint Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well Crouch actually put money into the club. Lowe has only ever taken money out. You decide who was the better Chairman. Though i think Wilde and the executives he brought in were a disaster. But who then got Lowe back into Saints? Would you trust Wilde? When did he do that?? P.S. paying for the statue isn't putting money into the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 think he meant singing never got rid of Lowe, there hasn't been any anti lowe chants yet but even if they build over the next few months he won't care. i agree with you NickG. Singing anti Lowe chants wont mean a thing to him,but it makes those who sing them feel better and it shows the weak ,pathetic board that us fans are not happy. After all,apart from not attending,what else can we do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 personally, as its meant to be for sport and enjoyment, I like to try and stay as positive as I can and get some enjoyment from the game rather than winding myself up about things out of my control (whilst hoping for a new united and rich! board) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 When did he do that?? P.S. paying for the statue isn't putting money into the club. Well i think it is. Do you think Lowe would have paid a penny towards a statue commemorating one of the greatest icons in Southamptons history? No hes already shown what type of person he is and what SFC really means to him,when he replaced the picture of LM holding the FA Cup with a bloody train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swannymere Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Yes we are Nick,but we both know that there are others who look on things differently,and they are not afraid to act. RUN!!!! The internet, nazi-quoting hardman is busy typing on his keyboard Grow up child, isn't it your bedtime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 RUN!!!! The internet, nazi-quoting hardman is busy typing on his keyboard Grow up child, isn't it your bedtime Well said that man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 personally, as its meant to be for sport and enjoyment, I like to try and stay as positive as I can and get some enjoyment from the game rather than winding myself up about things out of my control (whilst hoping for a new united and rich! board) Again i find myself agreeing with you. I used to go to watch Saints for the enjoyment and the social side of things. Believe me all i want to do is to go to SMS and watch Saints give it their all. Win,lose or draw(hopefully win),all i want is to support my team. But because of Lowe and his way of effecting and having a negative effect on all things Saints,its hard to ignore him and his actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarniaSaint Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 Well i think it is. Do you think Lowe would have paid a penny towards a statue commemorating one of the greatest icons in Southamptons history? No hes already shown what type of person he is and what SFC really means to him,when he replaced the picture of LM holding the FA Cup with a bloody train. No I don't think Lowe would have paid for the statue as the original abortion was paid for by the fans and not the club. Crouch paid for the replacement as a fan, I suppose that the statue could be referred to as an asset, but who owns it? As for that picture surely one of the team that won it would be more appropriate than one individual holding the cup. IMO of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrollman no2 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 No I don't think Lowe would have paid for the statue as the original abortion was paid for by the fans and not the club. Crouch paid for the replacement as a fan, I suppose that the statue could be referred to as an asset, but who owns it? As for that picture surely one of the team that won it would be more appropriate than one individual holding the cup. IMO of course. Fair comment and a valid point. If it was up to me i would have a picture of the FA Cup winning team all over the stadium,so hopefully it could install some pride and belief in what can happen if managed properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s0108787 Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 (edited) from the sky sports review of Reading v Watford... Kebe played in Rosenior down the right and his cross was criminally not cut out by Jack Cork in front of Loach to allow Doyle to flick in his 17th - and easiest - of the campaign from three yards. Does anyone need reminding that we took Reading to school at times at their place and could and perhaps should have beaten them at ours? Don't let the facts get in the way of a good moan eh?!! Edited 9 January, 2009 by s0108787 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 9 January, 2009 Share Posted 9 January, 2009 No I don't think Lowe would have paid for the statue as the original abortion was paid for by the fans and not the club. Crouch paid for the replacement as a fan, I suppose that the statue could be referred to as an asset, but who owns it? As for that picture surely one of the team that won it would be more appropriate than one individual holding the cup. IMO of course. Perhaps, but quite indubitably either is better than a ****ing train from Doncaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minsk Posted 10 January, 2009 Share Posted 10 January, 2009 And getting rid of Lowe worked well eh Yep! As far as I can remember we reached the pay-offs when he wasn't here. As opposed to ending up mid-table (with our strongest squad in the CCC) and probably (but hopefully not) being relegated with him at the helm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 10 January, 2009 Share Posted 10 January, 2009 from the sky sports review of Reading v Watford... Kebe played in Rosenior down the right and his cross was criminally not cut out by Jack Cork in front of Loach to allow Doyle to flick in his 17th - and easiest - of the campaign from three yards. Does anyone need reminding that we took Reading to school at times at their place and could and perhaps should have beaten them at ours? Don't let the facts get in the way of a good moan eh?!! Take it you didn't watch the game then? Watford had more possession but defended poorley. Scoreline flattered Reading who played poorly but took chances. Cork played in midfield and was outstanding acccording to commentators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 10 January, 2009 Share Posted 10 January, 2009 With the exception of the odd post here and there this thread is akin to a bunch of kids arguing in a primary school playground. Painful to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNick Posted 10 January, 2009 Share Posted 10 January, 2009 Perhaps, but quite indubitably either is better than a ****ing train from Doncaster.I agree with the sentiments BUT it is not any old picture of a train but a gift to the club in respect that we were honoured to be first to play at their new stadium.If they had given us a pennant would we throw it in a drawer. I suspect RL took it that the club should respect another clubs gesture and put it up in the boardroom.Afterall the fans never go in there and probably only officials of other clubs who would understand. as for the picture of LM, i would like it put up in the stadium alongside pictures of WGS Hoddle,Ball, and any other manager who walked out on us for greener pastures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now