Jump to content

Football Club Net Spend League


St.JonB
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just heard Jacobs and Hawksbee talk about this on their show so took a look where we sat:

https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-last-five-seasons/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-last-five-seasons

Unsurprisingly we sit 2nd bottom (or top if you are the owner).  With Norwich being relegated I'm sure the three coming up would have a big net spend then us. 

Edited by St.JonB
Spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, St.JonB said:

Just heard Jacobs and Hawksbee talk about this on their show so took a look where we sat:

https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-last-five-seasons/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-last-five-seasons

Unsurprisingly we sit 2nd bottom (or top if you are the owner).  With Norwich being relegated I'm sure the three coming up would have a big net spend then us. 

 

2 hours ago, Turkish said:

Dont forget we have agents fees, bonuses and NI contributions to pay which other clubs dont have to worry about.

 

20 minutes ago, HarvSFC said:

Only us and Norwich running a net spend profit, says all you need to know. Luckily we now seem to have good football personnel within the top of the club as that's all we can rely on.

Why is it automatically a bad thing? Sensible businesses make money.

The squad isn't in a bad place. Shift some more of the mistakes and things will look extremely healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Saint_clark said:

It's been proven time and again that net transfer spend rarely translates to table position, but ranking wage bills almost exactly matches league position. I'd be more interested in seeing that comparison.

Ask and you shall receive https://www.spotrac.com/epl/payroll/. We are 11th which is much more sensible. Wages have been our issue for years, when a player is on 80k a week, that is a few million a year. We have about 5 players on that sort of money not even in our squad, it dwarfs transfer fees and is undoubtedly where all our money is going. When we need to "sell to buy" it isn't because we are broke and can't afford transfer fees without raising money, it is because our wage bill is massive and if we can't shift players off it we will go under in the coming years and be forced to sell players for much less than they are worth just to stay afloat. It is just good business.

Also worthy of note we are 4th in the league for most spent on goalie wages, seems like our biggest sink.

EDIT: Bit of further analysis. Brighton have spent almost exactly 200m more than us in transfers in the last 5 years which has them as top 6 for net spend. However our wage bill is at the moment ~20m a year more than them and 2 years ago it was 42m more than them! Over the 5 years we have spent about 130m more than them on wages which doesn't make the net spend disparity seem that crazy. And brighton are very much an outlier in that their net spend is huge. 

Edited by TWar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})