Matthew Le God Posted May 25 Posted May 25 1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said: Well done. You've provided evidence that someone has had a private conversation with someone who doesn't work at SFC! There is zero evidence that the person who doesn't work at SFC was communicating with you - he could have been communicating with anyone! You have not met the burden of proof. Another fail. At the time of the conversation he worked at Saints. You are seemingly beyond being capable of grasping this. I also explained why I used him, as he used to work for Saints so matters less if I put it on here.
Weston Super Saint Posted May 25 Posted May 25 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: At the time of the conversation he worked at Saints. You are seemingly beyond being capable of grasping this. I also explained why I used him, as he used to work for Saints so matters less if I put it on here. There is no evidence he was communicating with you. Not sure why you can't grasp this. Also, he doesn't appear to be asking the person who he is communicating with's opinion on football, it seems to be related to a 'game'. Even 'if' he is communicating with you, it certainly suggests you are bullshitting when you claim these people are after your football insights. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted May 25 Posted May 25 3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: 1) You are still avoiding points in responses. 2) "desperately trying to prove you were the first to break the Will Still news earlier" You've failed to show that. 1) Nope. All answered. Your response confirmed that you made a complete fool of yourself by pretending you were followed by lots of players, only for it to be an unknown youth player, and another youth player who had left the club. 2) You said it was "bullshit" that you were desperately trying to pretend (for the umpteenth time) that you were breaking news, when you had just copied the core information had already been posted. You also lost points, as it was another post that whooshed right over your head. I posted the first two responses from others that also pointed out how desperate it was that you would claim to be breaking news, when you hadn't. Other posts pointing this out to you are available if you read back to when you did it, and got called on it. It's just one of your many flaws, that's now a forum joke. 3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: Really? I've played the game for 33 years and helped make it for the last 18 years. 1) Does playing the game make you more knowledgeable than someone who is a very respected figure in the FM community? Does playing the game for a long time automatically mean that you have more insight into it, or have the skill to extract things from it to benefit others? 2) By "helped make it for the last 18 years" do you really mean that you input figures under strict guidelines as a volunteer researcher, as opposed to y'know, actually being involved in the core teams within SI or freelanced to them, that actually do make it? 3) Does it still really hurt that someone with loads more to offer the FM community, than lying in "one to watch" guides, is working for the club? 3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: Real world people at Saints are interested in what some people on this forum have to say and not others. I don't know how you have the time between making FM26, being the Breaking News Desk and being the Voice of the Fans to spend so much time "digging holes based on being factually incorrect, logically flawed, missing the point entirely or often trying any excuse to defend any of the previous points. Not to mention editing your posts, going off in huffs and setting out to undermine posters." Oh wait, you're actually none of those things, outside your own head. 🙂
Matthew Le God Posted May 25 Posted May 25 1 minute ago, Weston Super Saint said: There is no evidence he was communicating with you. Not sure why you can't grasp this. He is asking to be on a game for Southampton. There is only one computer game in the world that has him on it and I'm the Southampton researcher for it.
Matthew Le God Posted May 25 Posted May 25 (edited) I'm going to follow my own suggestion and try out the forum's ignore function in the account settings for a while for some people. So if I don't reply to you, that'll be why. Edited May 25 by Matthew Le God 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted May 25 Posted May 25 11 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: I'm going to follow my own suggestion and try out the forum's ignore function in the account settings for a while for some people. So if I don't reply to you, that'll be why. Of course, in doing this you are proving that there is indeed a God. That's a bit inconvenient for you, that all our prayers have been answered. 🙂 And so you, to be pretending this is your own idea, after desperately trying to get the people who challenged your rubbish to put you on ignore. I shall somehow try to survive the loss of your replies. If you are reading this, I'd really like for the threads to no longer be derailed by your nonsense. Try working on that, please.
Weston Super Saint Posted May 26 Posted May 26 12 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: He is asking to be on a game for Southampton. There is only one computer game in the world that has him on it and I'm the Southampton researcher for it. So, to summarise. This is someone asking you about the Football Manager game who just happens to have worked at SFC once upon a time. Very different from your claim that 'influential people at Southampton football club are lining up to get your opinions on the club and football in general' 🤣 Nice one Walter Mitty! 1 1
Turkish Posted May 26 Author Posted May 26 (edited) I just checked out this chaps x profile interestingly despite MLGs x account following him he does not follow MLG back. This makes MLGs claims that Peter Thompson made the initial contact at best questionable. He only follows 126 accounts and FM saints researcher isn’t one of them which also suggests he isn’t particularly interested in the game or the work MLG has done Edited May 26 by Turkish 1
Matthew Le God Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Turkish said: I just checked out this chaps x profile interestingly despite MLGs x account following him he does not follow MLG back. This makes MLGs claims that Peter Thompson made the initial contact at best questionable. He only follows 126 accounts and FM saints researcher isn’t one of them which also suggests he isn’t particularly interested in the game or the work MLG has done This is likely my final ever post to you. Added to the ignore list. A final epic Turkish fail to end the thread! It still shows as following here on his profile, I don't know why it isn't also showing in the long list. Ask Elon Musk why! And even if he didn't follow me in 2025... that conversation was years ago when he was at Saints. He is not at Saints anymore, he is at Leicester now! He doesn't need to still follow me years after a conversation when he is at a different club! Numerous current backroom staff follow me, including Spors. And you've just shown you also do despite saying you don't use your Twitter account. Edited May 26 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted May 26 Author Posted May 26 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: This is likely my final ever post to you. Added to the ignore list. It still shows as following here on his profile, I don't know why it isn't also showing in the long list. Ask Elon Musk why! And even if he didn't follow me in 2025... that conversation was years ago when he was at Saints. He is not at Saints anymore, he is at Leicester now! He doesn't need to still follow me years after a conversation when he is at a different club! That shows people you are following not he is following you. so it seems like you don’t know how X works either. You can check his list of followers and you are not on it that’s the reason why you don’t appear It’s that simple. if he really was that interested in your work then why would he remove you? He used to folllow you, you’d have direct chats where he’d ask for your insights then one day removed you, okay then 😂😂😂 Sorry MLG but it doesn’t stack up a basic bit of investigation has exposed you as for another great sulk incoming then so long sunshine. It’s been fun exposing your endless errors and lies but I guess this one was the final knock out blow. Edited May 26 by Turkish 1 1
Matthew Le God Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) Turkish not understanding what "follows you" means. Or that a conversation can be from years ago. @Lighthouse you can close this thread now. As I won't be responding to @Turkish @Holmes_and_Watson @Weston Super Saint and some others again or reading their posts. That should help the main forum! ☺ Edited May 26 by Matthew Le God 4
Weston Super Saint Posted May 26 Posted May 26 3 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: @Lighthouse you can close this thread now. As I won't be responding to @Turkish @Holmes_and_Watson and some others again or reading their posts. That should help the main forum! ☺ 🤣🤣🤣 1
Weston Super Saint Posted May 26 Posted May 26 13 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Turkish not understanding what "follows you" means. Or that a conversation can be from years ago. @Lighthouse you can close this thread now. As I won't be responding to @Turkish @Holmes_and_Watson @Weston Super Saint and some others again or reading their posts. That should help the main forum! ☺ Immediate fail! 2 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:
Turkish Posted May 26 Author Posted May 26 Definitely not going to post anymore about you lighthouse close the thread 😂😂😂 2
Matthew Le God Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) Loads more on top of those But that'll do Bye bye 👋 Edited May 26 by Matthew Le God
Matthew Le God Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 8 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: Promise ? Only to those I've put on ze list (ignore). Edited May 26 by Matthew Le God
Weston Super Saint Posted May 26 Posted May 26 55 minutes ago, Turkish said: That shows people you are following not he is following you. so it seems like you don’t know how X works either. You can check his list of followers and you are not on it that’s the reason why you don’t appear It’s that simple. if he really was that interested in your work then why would he remove you? He used to folllow you, you’d have direct chats where he’d ask for your insights then one day removed you, okay then 😂😂😂 Sorry MLG but it doesn’t stack up a basic bit of investigation has exposed you as for another great sulk incoming then so long sunshine. It’s been fun exposing your endless errors and lies but I guess this one was the final knock out blow. It's not even 'his' account. It's an account associated with a football game that he has access to. No wonder senior figures at SFC are beating his door down for his opinions
Holmes_and_Watson Posted May 26 Posted May 26 3 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: @Lighthouse you can close this thread now. As I won't be responding to @Turkish @Holmes_and_Watson @Weston Super Saint and some others again or reading their posts. That should help the main forum! ☺ Well, finish as you started, with another utter fail. Changing your X followers from players (turning out to be 1 unknown youth player) and staff, to staff seems to have also backfired. From the example of "Real world people at Saints are interested in what some people on this forum have to say and not others", it seems they just want to be in the FM database, or things around FM. Which is fine, but not making you out to be the Voice of The Fans you were pretending to be, in between making FM and fronting the Newsdesk. Trying to get the mods to close down the thread now you've stropped off in a huff from the others in it, was also a nice finishing touch to showcase your personality. Still, nice to see you've followed at least some advice and put more people on ignore. Hopefully, it will make everyone's time here more enjoyable. Here's the original list of people who you wanted to put you on ignore, before going with our idea, just in case you miss anyone. On 26/04/2025 at 13:01, Matthew Le God said: @Holmes_and_Watson @Turkish @egg @badgerx16 @The Kraken @Weston Super Saint As you clearly do not like my posts... put me on your ignore list in the forum settings and you won't ever need to read them again. No excuse not to. And you might want to consider this one, just an hour later, although it only confirms what you said about yourself. 🙂 On 26/04/2025 at 14:02, CB Fry said: I don't have anyone on ignore, never have. I'm not changing that for a twat like you. I'll read and reply to who I like when I like, God willing. 1
badgerx16 Posted May 27 Posted May 27 11 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: Only to those I've put on ze list (ignore).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now