alpine_saint Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11336 No Pulis. Does this mean he is so shiiite he cant even make the bench ? And Gasmi ? Jeez, we are supposed to be broke and have utterly wasted what little money we have this season on transfers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/articles/article.php?page_id=11336 No Pulis. Does this mean he is so shiiite he cant even make the bench ? And Gasmi ? Jeez, we are supposed to be broke and have utterly wasted what little money we have this season on transfers. Pulis = Free Gasmi = Loan HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 7 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 7 February, 2009 pulis = free gasmi = loan hth Wages. HTH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Wages. HTH. and Agents Fees. For loans there are sometimes loan fees as well. HTH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 7 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 7 February, 2009 (edited) and Agents Fees. For loans there are sometimes loan fees as well. HTH It does. Thankyou. saint_stevo is such a luvvie he probably thinks that all this seasons signings are playing for what he aspires to - a stroke on the back of the hand from Rooopie, and if they play especially well and are very good, a flash of Roopie's sock-suspender... Edited 7 February, 2009 by alpine_saint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Pulis = Free Gasmi = Loan HTH But what is the point of filling our squad with players that aren't good enough to challenge those already here? We've got enough average players of our own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 But what is the point of filling our squad with players that aren't good enough to challenge those already here? We've got enough average players of our own. 2003 repeats itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeBenali Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 You can add to that list Ryan Smith aswell, had presumed he was injured after not featuring recently, but maybe Wotte just agrees that he's sh1te? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 I don't want us to waste money, and would love us only to sign players who establish themselves in first team, but look around -every club signs numerous players hoping they will be in fisrt team, never to be heard of again (Robbie Keane!). For every few signing half won't make it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 I don't want us to waste money, and would love us only to sign players who establish themselves in first team, but look around -every club signs numerous players hoping they will be in fisrt team, never to be heard of again (Robbie Keane!). For every few signing half won't make it Yes but surely Nick, it would be better to sign ONE player who could improve the team. Or, keep a Rasiak, Dyer or John, than sign the likes of Gasmi, Pulis, Smith and (dare I say it) this Hungarian guy, who just add to the drain of wages but offer very little. I know Gasmi, Pulis and Smith were cheap but they'd be a damn sight cheaper if they weren't here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Pulis = Free Gasmi = Loan HTH Pulis = soon impossible to play 15 games this season, so get ready to cough up your dosh!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwertySFC Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 No Pulis. Does this mean he is so shiiite he cant even make the bench ? And Gasmi ? Jeez, we are supposed to be broke and have utterly wasted what little money we have this season on transfers. August club statement "Anthony is a good footballing player and he's young. That's good for us and he wants to prove himself. Maybe that will be easier at a club where his dad is not the boss!" said Saints head coach Jan Poortvliet. Pulis is currently injured but should be back in training next week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 More worryingly is the statement that we don't miss Jack Cork. THAT is deluded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwertySFC Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 http://www.clubfanzine.com/stoke_city/v2.showNews.php?id=3410 Please read this link about Tony's football achievements Say's it all really, if we are paying him about a grand a week , he has nearly taken nearly 25k in wages and what has he done for this team What Wonker decided to sign him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 http://www.clubfanzine.com/stoke_city/v2.showNews.php?id=3410 Please read this link about Tony's football achievements Say's it all really, if we are paying him about a grand a week , he has nearly taken nearly 25k in wages and what has he done for this team What Wonker decided to sign him I don't think i've ever seen a worse player profile in my life, not even Ryan Smith. The person responsible for signing this player should be hung from the Itchen Bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Yes but surely Nick, it would be better to sign ONE player who could improve the team. Or, keep a Rasiak, Dyer or John, than sign the likes of Gasmi, Pulis, Smith and (dare I say it) this Hungarian guy, who just add to the drain of wages but offer very little. I know Gasmi, Pulis and Smith were cheap but they'd be a damn sight cheaper if they weren't here. sure, but its finding that one player! If it was a straight choice Gasmi/Pullis/Smith and new CB (not seijs) or Rasiak -Rasiak every time! Guess they don't add up to close to that though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Paul Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 The signing of young Pulis stinks to high heaven.Something is not right, either the people running our Club are complete fools, or there's something dodgey about it...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 It does. Thankyou. saint_stevo is such a luvvie he probably thinks that all this seasons signings are playing for what he aspires to - a stroke on the back of the hand from Rooopie, and if they play especially well and are very good, a flash of Roopie's sock-suspender... Do shut up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMondo Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Playing devil's advocate here, but it seems to me that Pulis's record is not so different to how Gillet's was at the start of the season. I think Gillet is a useful squad player, and as far as I know is not related to any of the management team, so why does everyone think there is something wrong or suspicious about Pulis's signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graffito Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Seems he's not even capable of getting onto the treatment table let alone the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 7 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Do shut up Wow, thats me told... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Wow, thats me told... Well i didn't want to waste my time writing a message to an idiot who is widely regarded as a total joke. But it seems i just have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Paul Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 so why does everyone think there is something wrong or suspicious about Pulis's signing? Because we signed him when he was injured, we could of waited until the Jan window if we really wanted to sign him.Why, if moneys so tight are we paying a bloke whose injured, it's not that there were other Clubs after him...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 7 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 7 February, 2009 Well i didn't want to waste my time writing a message to an idiot who is widely regarded as a total joke. But it seems i just have If I am regarded as a total joke, its because I am regarded as over-negative (although I proven right over and over again ), and because I project my opinion in a somewhat aggressive manner. Probably due to a lack of patience with complete idiots like you. By the way, you are widely regarded as a complete joke because of your utter devotion and sychophancy to a chairman about as loved in these parts as Adolf Hitler.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 If truth be known at a normal CCC club the likes of Pulis, Gasmi, Smith and the like would not be entertained in a reserve team at their age and ability, sorry, lack of ability. Zoltan is going to turn out exactly the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 If I am regarded as a total joke, its because I am regarded as over-negative (although I proven right over and over again ), and because I project my opinion in a somewhat aggressive manner. Probably due to a lack of patience with complete idiots like you. By the way, you are widely regarded as a complete joke because of your utter devotion and sychophancy to a chairman about as loved in these parts as Adolf Hitler.. Where do you get this from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameisthehulk Posted 7 February, 2009 Share Posted 7 February, 2009 If I am regarded as a total joke, its because I am regarded as over-negative (although I proven right over and over again ), and because I project my opinion in a somewhat aggressive manner. Probably due to a lack of patience with complete idiots like you. By the way, you are widely regarded as a complete joke because of your utter devotion and sychophancy to a chairman about as loved in these parts as Adolf Hitler.. You are regarded as a total joke because your opinions, which you spout so aggressively, are based upon very little knowledge of :- 1 - Football 2 - Anything I try to be patient and accept your "character" but the fact is you are an ignorant knob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMondo Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 The August Club Statement quoted above suggests they didn't think he would be out injured for long. Maybe they thought they needed to get in a bit more cover for the midfield positions before the Summer transfer window closed. On the other hand, our addiction to signing injured players makes me wonder if we have some sort of deal with a local convalescent home... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 You are regarded as a total joke because your opinions, which you spout so aggressively, are based upon very little knowledge of :- 1 - Football 2 - Anything I try to be patient and accept your "character" but the fact is you are an ignorant knob. Of course I dont, depsite the fact that I am right a damn sight more often than the likes of you. And how you came to your second Word of God, I'll never know. You are obviously one of these so sad dweebs who thnk they can judge everything down to shoe size from what someone writes on a chat site... I suppose I should be grateful of you being tolerant and patient for soooo long... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 sure, but its finding that one player! If it was a straight choice Gasmi/Pullis/Smith and new CB (not seijs) or Rasiak -Rasiak every time! Guess they don't add up to close to that though What Rasiak who's been able to play just 18 games and score a sensational 3 goals?. Even McG has a better strike rate than that. Rasiak is one of the most overhyped players ever to grace English football. I bet if you knew a real Watford supporter they'd tell you that he is a complete waste of time and money. We should have tried to keep Saga though, that may have made a difference but if he played like last season perhaps not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameisthehulk Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Of course I dont, depsite the fact that I am right a damn sight more often than the likes of you. And how you came to your second Word of God, I'll never know. You are obviously one of these so sad dweebs who thnk they can judge everything down to shoe size from what someone writes on a chat site... I suppose I should be grateful of you being tolerant and patient for soooo long... Your response makes no sense, possibly due to the fact you are stupid and unable to counter my points. If YOU think I am a sad dweeb, that is pretty indicative of what you hold as important. Roll eyes smiley not used to save global warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Your response makes no sense, possibly due to the fact you are stupid and unable to counter my points. If YOU think I am a sad dweeb, that is pretty indicative of what you hold as important. Roll eyes smiley not used to save global warming. Make a point, somewhen, and I will counter it with complete ease. You havent made one yet apart from post insults. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickG Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 If I am regarded as a total joke, its because I am regarded as over-negative (although I proven right over and over again ), and because I project my opinion in a somewhat aggressive manner. Probably due to a lack of patience with complete idiots like you. By the way, you are widely regarded as a complete joke because of your utter devotion and sychophancy to a chairman about as loved in these parts as Adolf Hitler.. if you predict we will lose every game every player we sign will fail etc you will be right a good proportion of the time, not as often as someone who judges each on its merits -and they will have a less depressing time as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 if you predict we will lose every game every player we sign will fail etc you will be right a good proportion of the time, not as often as someone who judges each on its merits -and they will have a less depressing time as well Nope, sorry, the old "clock stopped / right twice a day" axiom is not relevant here. I have made specific predictions and observations. The only things I have got wrong this season was expecting us to conceed 10 goals between the Reading and ManU games, and that Saga would be gone in the Jan window, and that was only prevented by a rule about the number of clubs you can play for in one season. I said back in August that this season would pan out like this, and I came close to being right about last season too. I was one of the first to demand Burley be removed, I said months ago Killer would never play for us again and I indicated that Schniderlin was a lightweight and wouldnt deliver, amongst other things.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameisthehulk Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Nope, sorry, the old "clock stopped / right twice a day" axiom is not relevant here. I have made specific predictions and observations. The only things I have got wrong this season was expecting us to conceed 10 goals between the Reading and ManU games, and that Saga would be gone in the Jan window, and that was only prevented by a rule about the number of clubs you can play for in one season. I said back in August that this season would pan out like this, and I came close to being right about last season too. I was one of the first to demand Burley be removed, I said months ago Killer would never play for us again and I indicated that Schniderlin was a lightweight and wouldnt deliver, amongst other things.. I beleive you touted administration as a solution to our problems, which is possibly the most retarded view anyone could have. You have this opinion based on the fact you have little or no idea of the implications of administration. Being correct about the things mentioned above means nothing, we all knew this season would be tough, congratulations on Burley but would you have him back now? I know I would have whisky George over Wotte or Jan. Killer was a gamble that didnt pay off, we all knew it was a gamble. Morgan could yet prove to be a good player, I havent seen enough of him to judge, neither have you. Being correct about things is not the be all and end all, I would rather be wrong than be a total ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Being correct about things is not the be all and end all, I would rather be wrong than be a total ****. Pity you ended up being both then, isnt it ??? Oh, and I stand by my opinion on administration, whether you think it "retarded" or not....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 lol @ Alpine, had a pop at me and its all blown up in your face from other angles. Oh dear eh...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 lol @ Alpine, had a pop at me and its all blown up in your face from other angles. Oh dear eh...... "Other angles" being a non-entity known as "mynameisthehulk" Wow.. Still smarting from your smart-arse comment about Pulis and Gasmi not costing us money blowing up in your face, eh ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 "Other angles" being a non-entity known as "mynameisthehulk" Wow.. Still smarting from your smart-arse comment about Pulis and Gasmi not costing us money blowing up in your face, eh ?? Never said they didn't cost us any money. I was getting at they didn't cost us any money initially, no outlay reqd etc. Loans are always a bit of a gamble, some work, some dont. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Never said they didn't cost us any money. I was getting at they didn't cost us any money initially, no outlay reqd etc. Loans are always a bit of a gamble, some work, some dont. Your "He'll play 15 games this season" is going to cost you!!! Was it £50 we agreed on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Your "He'll play 15 games this season" is going to cost you!!! Was it £50 we agreed on? Warped memory Sir, i seem to recall it being a pre-match pint(s) before the last home game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Warped memory Sir, i seem to recall it being a pre-match pint(s) before the last home game? I'll be drinking pints of vodka if we're down by then!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mynameisthehulk Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 "Other angles" being a non-entity known as "mynameisthehulk" Wow.. Still smarting from your smart-arse comment about Pulis and Gasmi not costing us money blowing up in your face, eh ?? Non-entity because I dont spend my life talking out of my arse on here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Without wishing to involve myself in the 'tit for tat' schoolboy stuff that has developed on this thread I would like to state my opinion of the Pulis signing : IMHO If anyone thinks that he was ever going to improve our team they need their heads examining! He had an almost non existent track record, he played only a handful of games in recent years, he was injured when he signed, we already had too many midfielders and we were crying out for experience at the time ! You do not need the benefit of hindsight in this case, as it was just a downright bad decision ! Christ, even the p*ss poor management team do not even stick him on the bench when we are desperate !!!! How any of you can try and justify it, I have absolutely no idea !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Non-entity because I dont spend my life talking out of my arse on here? Where do you spend your time talking out of it then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Le Shearer Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Nope, sorry, the old "clock stopped / right twice a day" axiom is not relevant here. I have made specific predictions and observations. The only things I have got wrong this season was expecting us to conceed 10 goals between the Reading and ManU games, and that Saga would be gone in the Jan window, and that was only prevented by a rule about the number of clubs you can play for in one season. I said back in August that this season would pan out like this, and I came close to being right about last season too. I was one of the first to demand Burley be removed, I said months ago Killer would never play for us again and I indicated that Schniderlin was a lightweight and wouldnt deliver, amongst other things.. seeing you here,bragging & claiming to have been right about all sorts,makes me stunned ! you must have the biggest ego,and the most selective memory since Stalin. Refresh our memories of what you said-on at least a thousand occasions-when there were ten matches left in our Play-off season..? "we`ll never make it,those who think so are stupid bastards without grasp of reality bla-bla-bla" and how about the infamous: "ANYONE but Burley would make this team improve" ?? shortly followed by your wish coming through,and two "any-ones" came in and made the team a total shamble. Alpine,just face facts: you are NEVER right about important issues. and the times you are most wrong,are the exact same times where you scream out your loudest and most bombastic theories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 8 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 8 February, 2009 seeing you here,bragging & claiming to have been right about all sorts,makes me stunned ! you must have the biggest ego,and the most selective memory since Stalin. Refresh our memories of what you said-on at least a thousand occasions-when there were ten matches left in our Play-off season..? "we`ll never make it,those who think so are stupid bastards without grasp of reality bla-bla-bla" and how about the infamous: "ANYONE but Burley would make this team improve" ?? shortly followed by your wish coming through,and two "any-ones" came in and made the team a total shamble. Alpine,just face facts: you are NEVER right about important issues. and the times you are most wrong,are the exact same times where you scream out your loudest and most bombastic theories. Superb effort, but lets got through and take this bolllocks apart, point-by-point.. I dont come on here "bragging & claiming", but if someone posts "you dont know what you are talking about", "you talk out of your arse", etc., etc., I reserve the right to defend myself and cite evidence to the contrary, and you have little right to be in uproar about that. Re: the play-offs. We sneaked in by the skin of our teeth, into the last place in the last game, because Preston bottled it, despite having spent a fortune for this level on our team. Oh, and then we played crap to put us behind in the playoff, then threw it away with ****e penalty-taker selection after fighting our way back into the fixture. We got so far in spite of Burley, not because of him, and I wasnt that far away from being correct, in that that season was a colossal underachievement. Re: Anyone but Burley could do better. Anyone who had the faintest clue about what they were doing (Pearson) did do better than Burley last season. Anyone who doesnt have the foggiest (Dodd & Gorman, Wotte & Poortvillet) hasnt done better. We had the chance to get the likes of Billy Davies and Ian Dowie, proven achievers at this level, and went instead for clueless diickheads. Sorry, you want to present my comments against me as a black-and-white fait accompli, which it isnt. Never mind, its a common mistake made by those of limited intellect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Le Shearer Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Re: the play-offs. We sneaked in by the skin of our teeth, into the last place in the last game, because Preston bottled it, despite having spent a fortune for this level on our team. Oh, and then we played crap to put us behind in the playoff, then threw it away with ****e penalty-taker selection after fighting our way back into the fixture. We got so far in spite of Burley, not because of him, and I wasnt that far away from being correct, in that that season was a colossal underachievement. Re: Anyone but Burley could do better. Anyone who had the faintest clue about what they were doing (Pearson) did do better than Burley last season. Anyone who doesnt have the foggiest (Dodd & Gorman, Wotte & Poortvillet) hasnt done better. We had the chance to get the likes of Billy Davies and Ian Dowie, proven achievers at this level, and went instead for clueless diickheads. a simple "yes" or "no" will do fine this time,wihout all the ifs,buts and what-could-have beens. your statements were made without such reservations you claim now,at the time they were made. so once agian,without any excusing reservations: were you right or wrong on those occasions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRobbie Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 More worryingly is the statement that we don't miss Jack Cork. THAT is deluded. My thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintwarwick Posted 8 February, 2009 Share Posted 8 February, 2009 Superb effort, but lets got through and take this bolllocks apart, point-by-point.. I dont come on here "bragging & claiming", but if someone posts "you dont know what you are talking about", "you talk out of your arse", etc., etc., I reserve the right to defend myself and cite evidence to the contrary, and you have little right to be in uproar about that. Re: the play-offs. We sneaked in by the skin of our teeth, into the last place in the last game, because Preston bottled it, despite having spent a fortune for this level on our team. Oh, and then we played crap to put us behind in the playoff, then threw it away with ****e penalty-taker selection after fighting our way back into the fixture. We got so far in spite of Burley, not because of him, and I wasnt that far away from being correct, in that that season was a colossal underachievement. Re: Anyone but Burley could do better. Anyone who had the faintest clue about what they were doing (Pearson) did do better than Burley last season. Anyone who doesnt have the foggiest (Dodd & Gorman, Wotte & Poortvillet) hasnt done better. We had the chance to get the likes of Billy Davies and Ian Dowie, proven achievers at this level, and went instead for clueless diickheads. Sorry, you want to present my comments against me as a black-and-white fait accompli, which it isnt. Never mind, its a common mistake made by those of limited intellect. Right so Preston bottled it to enable us to sneak into the playoffs but Leicester didn't bottle it to allow us to survive the championship Whilst Burley underachieved he didn't have us fighting relegation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now