qwertyell

MLT on Sky complaining about how boring Saints were at the weekend, passing side to side instead of attacking. Says Gabbiadini makes amazing runs but it's a total waste of time as no-one will pass the ball forwards. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Another listless performance with no attacking threat, no sense of urgency and no impression that the new manager has the slightest idea how to get the best out of his squad. When is the time to panic? That's all three promoted teams played now and we haven't beaten any of them. Scraping together a minimal amount of points against one of the easiest opening 10 games we'll ever have is going to be put into stark, bleak context by the time all the decent teams have met us, I fear. Forster - 4. Worst keeper in the league on current form. Seven year contract extension incoming... Cedric - 5. Can't help being short, but the frequency with which opponents are standing the ball up to the far post for an easy towering header over Cedric's non-challenge is a serious problem. Bertrand - 5. Phoning it in. Van Dijk - 5. See Bertrand. Hoedt - 5. Knock a point off for whinging about not playing and then being bang average when he does. Romeu - 5. Is he just not good anymore? Davis - 6. Davis-y. Ward-Prowse - 4. Takes a decent set-piece. And there begins and ends all of his attributes of any worth. Anonymous in open play. Boufal - 6. Some flicks, some tricks, some flailing around. Not great. Tadic - 5. Nothing much. Again. Gabbiadini - 4. Might as well have not played a striker if we had no plans to attack. Must've really relished having to contest aimless 70 yards hoofs with two 6' 4" centre backs and no support within the same county. Subs: nothing. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Jesus Christ, Forster is a liability. Has all the agility of a tree. Standing the ball up to the far post for the striker to easily beat Cedric in the air has been a fruitful opposition tactic for too long. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Successfully boring them to death so far. It'd be nice if we could give Gabbiadini some support and try for a second - I think we'll find it hard to get back on the front foot if we keep sitting deep and do concede an equaliser. Come on, Saints, show a bit of intent to take charge of this game. Passive football is rife with pitfalls. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Amazing how much weaker we'll be with just the loss of one midfielder. I think it's time Hojbjerg had another shot, but I suspect we'll get the much tried and failed trio of Romeu, Davis and Ward-Prowse instead. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Perhaps he didn't have any choice but to play "slow tempo" football with a squad full of one-paced sideways passers. It's not as though we've been rattling around at breakneck speed since Puel left - it's been more of the same: slow, ponderous, unimaginative. Good luck to him if he goes to Leicester. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

But a worldie for cement legs. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Yeah, that's the part making me uncomfortable. In theory our squad should be better than three other sides', but we're likely to hit the halfway point right in the mix for the relegation places, and who knows how we'll react to that. Character isn't one of the qualities I'd particularly rate among our team. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Doubt he gives a crap. Gets a fat pay off and can go and manage the Dutch national team now. All in all, a very lucrative 18 months. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

IMHO Forster - 5. Made a decent regulation save from a Chadli shot, but fumbled a couple of crosses badly and looked anything but secure. Cedric - 6. I feel like I've seen Cedric play the exact same game 50 times. Reasonably solid in defence? Check. Get into some good crossing positions? Check. Either shank every cross into the crowd or hit the first man? Check. Speculative 30 yard shot miles wide? Check. Yoshida - 6. Solid, didn't have much to do. Van Dijk - 7. Looked far more engaged today than he has since his reintroduction into civilised society. Bertrand - 7. Made more overlapping runs in one game than he has all season, for club and country combined. Romeu - 6. I don't think he's been particularly great so far this season, and finding himself often having to be the one to try and pick a pass through a packed defence was a bit beyond his limitations. Lemina - 8. Really is a quality all-round midfielder. Even if it is literally impossible to tell him (white hair) apart from Boufal (black hair)... Davis - 6. He is what he is: tidy, diligent, inoffensive and never in any danger of delivering the killer pass that opens up an opponent. Tadic - 6. Was he always this hesitant? Can't remember the last occasion when he actually made a pass or took a shot first time. Too many touches and then the chance is gone. Worked hard, though. Gabbiadini - 6. Great run to set up Long, but another game where he'll be left wondering when his teammates are going to create something for him. Long - 4. Pointless selection. Against a team defending so deep as to leave no space in behind, why would you pick a player down the middle whose only meaningful attribute is running into space behind? It meant he had to try and get involved in the build up play, which his embarrassing lack of technical ability couldn't cope with. Missed his one clear chance, naturally. Subs: Redmond - 7. Thought he did well. Was far more proactive than usual, receiving the ball on the half turn and driving forward. A marked contrast with the timid, buck-passing performances he's been giving for months. Boufal - 8. He's only scored three goals for us, and they've all been top banana. I thought he last few sub appearances had shown promise - and far more hunger than we'd previously seen - and expected him to start. Maybe he'll get a start next week... Austin - 6. Impossible chance at the end there. Beard's coming along well with winter on the horizon. It was a weird performance. Is spite of all the pre-match talk of playing quicker, we were still slow and ponderous in the first half. It was only after the break that we really got on the front foot. Tactically it was a strange set up. All the space was on the wings, but we didn't have any width at all. I'm not sure this match will act as a blueprint for how Pellegrino wants us to play, but a win's a win and very welcome - four points above the relegation zone now. Relief rather than joy. But that's only to be expected having had to endure 95 minutes of depressing Pulis-ball. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Worst keeper in the league. Total liability. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Not working, for me. We haven't got any width and are trying to play through the packed middle with non-creative players like Davis and Romeu, and looking for cute flicks and one-twos with the technical atrocity that is Shane Long. And STILL, in spite of all the pre-match talk of needing to play faster, we're at walking pace. WBA are one set-piece from nicking a 1-0. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

Romeu has been off colour all season - looking more like he's reverted to Wanyama's cheap and cheerful back up from two years ago than the surprisingly decent, consistent performer of most of last term. Maybe it's just that Lemina's dynamism and all round game is showing up how limited our other midfielders are in contrast.

That was f-ing clueless. Hanging on at home for a lucky draw against Newcastle, for goodness sake. At no point did we play like a side chasing the game. It was the same turgid pace throughout, only the structure fell apart with all the substitutions. Sorry, but this manager inspires no confidence at all. There's just nothing there to take comfort in. If we were playing well but not getting the results you could at least see light at the end of the tunnel, but we're appalling all over the park. If there we signs of a new system or style "bedding in", maybe you could cling to the hope that it'll click in time. But there aren't. Whatever the Pellegrino stamp supposedly is isn't evident thus far, having had several months and a raft of very winnable fixtures to show what he's about. We're in trouble, chaps. These are the easy games we're struggling horribly in. If we can't change course, with the ugly run of fixtures coming in November and December, we could be sitting on about 15 points at Christmas. Van Dijk, playing half-assed, can fudge right off to wherever too. We're no more secure at the back with him doing the bare minimum than we were with Stephens playing.

Have we tried lethargically passing the ball sideways and backwards yet? I feel like that's the key to winning any football match.

United have been following Andrija Zivkovic of Benfica for some time. 21 year old winger. Don't know if he's playing or on the bench.

I think the deeper role is where he'll end up eventually. At what level he'll be playing then, I'm not so sure. Neat and tidy on the ball, with the ability to switch play with decent mid-range passing and an eye for long through balls - that all worked great for him for the England u21s. But it was against kids, mostly as physically underdeveloped as him. Unless he can match up to the adults in your average Premier League midfield, he's got no chance. He doesn't have to be quick - Michael Carrick and Gareth Barry are proof of that. He doesn't have to be built like the Hulk - Ngolo Kante, Scott Parker, Dennis Wise, among others, have been more than able to hold their own. But he does need to be able to tackle, to relish the battle for possession, to stop being so accommodatingly passive. He's never going to be bruiser, so his defensive work will have to be built around positional discipline, reading the play and being a step ahead, interceptions, and general enthusiastic harassment. I'm not sure his development has been helped by not having a clearly defined role at Saints and playing a game here and there in this position and that. But that's his challenge to overcome. I don't think he's a write-off as a footballer, but he's a player looking for an identity at present, and seems a bit lost, unfortunately.

Isn't the point of experiments to find out answers that aren't already known? The results have been in on Long for many a year: he averages less than 6 goals per season in the Premier League. That's not very good. No-one can be remotely surprised that he's doing a woefully inadequate job of leading the line. And yet, here we are: playing one up top, who doesn't score, during a horrible period in which we're desperate for goals. Funny old game, Saints.

He hasn't. Did his knee in preseason. Not expected back in 2017.

Didn't Schneiderlin used to be quite good two or three years ago? Sad.

Not sure what else there is to say that hasn't been repeated ad nauseum for months - we are absolutely shocking going forward. In the early days of Puel, even if it didn't come off, we could at least see what he was TRYING to do, how he wanted us to attack and in what shape. The biggest concern I have with Pellegrino is I don't see what the plan is. We're somehow both rigid and shapeless. We don't attack the goal, we just pass nicely and occasionally make half a yard of space on the wings for a cross to one man in the box marked by three. And that's about it for our attacking ideas. The manager doesn't look as if he's got any particular idea how to resolve our goalscoring epidemic. Three games of Shane Long leading the line alone has been as fruitful as everyone would've predicted. Pellegrino has had as soft an opening set of fixtures as he could've hoped for, and he's overseen a desperately poor start to the season - we needed these early points in the bag because Nov/Dec are going to yield very little. At this rate we're going to struggle to the halfway point of the season with less than 20 points - and less than 15 goals. If you don't think we're in for a relegation fight, you haven't been paying attention.

Hyperbole, probably - he has made a couple of decent last ditch challenges. But I would argue his demeanor and general strolling-about-ness is in marked contrast to last season's Van Dijk, and those last ditch challenges have been required as a result of him being caught out of position first, or just playing too casually. Anyway, second half is up - let's turn this ship around... somehow. Sent from my F3311 using Tapatalk

H/T 0-1. We created two chances: Redmond - who has been hopeless - put through and meekly scuffing wide, and Long drawing a save from Butland close in where he should've done better. Aside from that, we've been sloppy all over the park. Van Dijk's barely interested - playing like he's doing us a favour. Romeu is still out of sorts. Cedric's been poor going both ways. The only reason we're even still in the game is Forster, who is having an excellent game. It's going to need another stark second half transformation like last week if we've got any chance of getting something here. As things stand, I can't see us a) breaking them down or b) not conceding again. Troubling times.

How many defenders you really need to repel the mighty Shane Long and his merry band of impotent attackers?

It's not as if that's the most important element or anything; the aim of the game... "We're only money away from being millionaires!"