CB Fry

I would definitely say I do not have enough interest in multiple sports for me to have a sustained benefit from the Athletic. It's nice they try and find new Saints content 3/4 days a week. Even if it is a bit dull. But for £1 a month I'm all in. Not sure how they are making money on that though.

I signed up on this deal as well - £1 a month is leass than I spend on Newspapers so worth it. That said, I think it is only okay. Some of the articles are just over written and overlong. The recent Saints content- an absolutely shameless bit of club propaganda on our groundbreaking transfer strategy and a interminably long piece on the B team - I could easily live without. It's worth a pound a month but that's about it. It reminds me of World Scoccer magazine from the 90s - drab and worthy but not particularly engaging.

Hahahahahahaha. Jesus wept.

Not sure if anyone has read the puff-piece in The Athletic this week. Presented as a good news story on how the recruitment problems are now over, and we won't be making those mistakes again (ie Carillo) but really reading it through the piece is like a UK Gold repeat of a Les Reed interview. Unique black box, planning years ahead for every eventuality (ie Ings replacement), 4 or 5 candidates for every position,we analyse their personality as well as their football skills. On and on and on. The same old Southampton Way "we're so special and different" delusion. Meanwhile, Kevin Danso. Meanwhile, what has Djenepo delivered yet? Salisu, we'll see. On paper could be Hoedt, could be Van Dijk. Meanwhile, we have 5 players for every possible eventuality but today we have a bench of kids and no central midfielder to replace our captain who we all knew was definitely going sometime in March. The same problems remain - the primary objective is public relations and spin. And spending the barest of bare minimums to scrape buy. Cut the crap lads.

We're going to lose but that's the best team he can put out.

But he's not talking about next year. He's talking about now. I remain incredibly comfortable in my belief that this season Ings will do fine but not enough to make him remotely interesting to the likes of Spurs next year anyway.

Personally looking forward to the mental gymnastics some on here will go through in a couple of months time to pretend that Ralph saying "we will do something. We have to. The market is still open" actually meant that he was delighted with the squad and any incoming would be a lovely bonus.

I actually think the opposite. He'll get a decent pay rise/extension off the back of this and then proceed to score 12-14 goals a season for the next three years.

£794 up tonight apparently.

You'd have to be absolutely mad to think this lot could finish in the top half.

I'm hearing that talk of us signing Loftus-Cheek are wide of the mark.

Shane Long is coming on so that means goals goals goals.

We are never ever ever ever going to score.

You've handled a small line up change on a TV football chat show with slightly less dignity than a 14 year old girl sobbing over Robbie leaving Take That. Absolutely pathetic. Man up you blubbering ponce.

Corbyn was a frequent contributor to RT, as was Milne and others in the Corbyn orbit. Milne was a Putin fan-girl, and host of fawning interviews with the great dictator. When Salisbury happened the Cretin could not bring himself to condemn the Russian state for hostile act on a British soil. Yes, the is plenty of dodgy Russian money in the country and the Conservatives are as culpable as any. But Corbyn, mainly because of his pitifully dim "anti-imperialism" sixth former worldview, is a perpetual facilitator and apologist for the Russian state.

I just hope he has the dreams and ambitions we require to take us to our rightful place in the Champions League.

There is some point to friendlies but these weren't friendlies. Ooh, I've come over all MLG.

In fairness they weren’t friendlies to "learn from". Over the two games Danny Ings played about as much as I'd expected and JWP probably about 80 minutes more than I expected. Ings was nothing more than a form-based call up that Southgate had to make. But in reality Ings has no England future, I wouldn’t worry too much about it.

Why? If you're a reporter or the political editor of, say, Sky or CNN, then you're the front person of a collective effort. Newspapers do the same thing ("The Times can reveal"). Saying anything other than "we" would be incorrect. I guess what I am saying is that the small thing in life that annnoy me is people not really understanding how journalists/ism work.

I'd like one with Matt Le Tissier's face on. Circa 1993.

Says the man bawling his eyes out because some people on a football chat show might be different to last season.

The fatal combination of supreme self-confidence combined with being pitifully as thick as mince. Trending with the word "Holocaust" is some achievement for him, probably up there with that first goal against Newcastle.

Jesus wept.

You're kidding yourself son. Salisu was reported in the same "random" way as McKennie was.

Le Tissier made it incredibly easy for them to sack him with the absolute horseshit he was and is coming out with on social media. I called it several weeks ago, and here we are. Utterly predictable. The money and prestige won't be comparable, but would be good to hear him on Solent replacing Big Dave who hs absolutely appalling.