Absolutely it doesn't.
We had a pretty solid period of success with a high managerial turnover from 1998 up to the end of the Luggy season, and of course our rise through the divisions was punctuated with plenty of managerial upheaval.
Plus unstable Chelsea and Man City have pi ssed all over super stable Arsene in the same time.
Up there with net spend as a spectacular false metric.
The ticket office have confirmed I'll be sat next to you. Currently toying with either Super Mario or the Go Compare man. And my carer gave me a Vuvuzela so I'll probably bring that too.
I've got a shed
That's bigger than this
I've got a shed that's bigger than this
It's got a door and a window
I've got a shed that's bigger than this
What's Italian for shed?
Happy days. The only shame is we got ours last week on the corporate prawn sandwich ticket but ended up with four seats not together but in two pairs of two. Probably could have got four together now. Oh well.
8,000 Saints fans will be immense and a nice little mini takeover of Milan for the night. Brilliant.
I'd stick Redmond out there with the kids/reserves. He should be able to cope with the games and he needs as many matches as possible playing up front. He needs to keep getting chances and hopefully taking more/gaining composure.
Other than that, B team.
Where does Batman suggest it's all down to the manager? Being that you hound him around this forum for comments he's made about players he doesn't rate you know that isn't true at all.
Keep the drivel coming.
If he picks that team and we don't win, the people on here who suggested that team can still question the manager.
You do realise that football management is slightly more than just waiting eleven names down, don't you?
So basically the fanbase aren't slagging off the right players and should be having a go at Fonte, Cedric and Tadic instead. No wonder the club historian liked this post.