CB Fry

http://m.thestar.co.uk/news/local/rotherham-mp-sarah-champion-to-repay-expenses-after-claiming-17-cost-of-poppy-wreath-1-7156663 My, my. If you want to see manufactured, shrill, full-on frothing mouth screaming outrage, get onto twitter and search Sarah Champion. Pretty astonishing stuff, to be honest. As inconsequential non stories go, it's a cracker. Any swivel eyed fury merchants feel like chipping on on this "disgrace" in the lounge, fill yer boots.

You're going to stop talking about Stoke and Swansea catching us then? Good.

They already have no chance of the play offs. None whatsoever.

Five year plans in business don't stop - they roll on.

Absolutely - we're the senior partner here. Odd.

(If any of this is true) I understand to a point a need to have a link up with a US team but don't really get why it needs to ruin our away kit. Those yank fans aren't going to start buying it or supporting us, and I'd suggest your average Saints fan doesn't really give a monkeys about that kind of US partnership, certainly not if it means being lumbered with a god awful second kit. So, basically, I'm out.

What are you just saying? If you think Prescott should have lost his job over it, then Clarkson losing his job would be the correct thing to happen right?

North American brand doesn't specifically mean North American football club does it? Might just mean North American Brand. Like Twinkies or Coors Light or Aunt Jemima or semi automatic assault rifles.

So could you. Pretty sure I'm the one who said the BBC would want to keep them.

You seriously think they'd be tweeting things to that effect do you? And you're having a go at me for a lack of comprehension. LOL and indeed LOL.

Yet my enquiry to you about what you expected them to be concerned about you can't seem to muster a response to. [NEW PARAGRAPH] Oh well.

Are all three of those paragraphs all about the same topic, or are you covering new topics in each of the three?

Apologies for not accepting two words as a paragraph. Good luck in your application for a role at the Portsmouth News.

And? Don't really get your point. All that tells me is they are more circumspect when managing their public pronouncements than their co-host. It certainly doesn't say they are both quitting to go to Sky.

Just looked at their Twitter feeds. Not entirely sure what conclusion you're drawing from what either of them have said. Just a bit of Top Gear joshing.

It's a factor. Sky can chuck a huge contract at JC and maybe the other two but not necessarily the production team, and almost certainly not the scale and ambition of production values that the BBC bring to it. And not just the viewers and cache of being on genuinely one of Britain's biggest TV shows and part of a bona fide global TV brand. Plus May and Hammond get more from the BBC than just Top Gear, as they've both benefited from high profile, nicely made TV series on topics that interest them. You think they're going to walk out on all of that to do a half pint rip off to a niche audience because their colleague punched a co worker? Sorry, not so sure.

Seven points with 10 to go is loads of points in my book. We'd have to completely collapse for Stoke to overtake us. Nah. I think 7th is pretty much nailed on. It's not arrogance or presumption - we've earned it. People thinking we won't make seventh are just pessimists over compensating. We've been top four most of the season FFS. To drop to eighth from here we'd have to earn something meagre like 7, 8, 9 points for the remaining 10 games - Leicester City type form. Why on earth has happened this season that makes people think this is remotely likely?

He doesn't own it anymore - he did a deal with the BBC and BBC worldwide last year. We'll see how it plays out. I'm not sure May and Hammond would just walk out on TC if they had the chance to take it on. Top Gear currently 5 million viewers. A Sky version would pull in about a fifth of that at best, probably less.

That probably would happen but it would be a Clarkson show, not Top Gear and it wouldn't achieve anywhere near the scale of the current brand. Just a classic case of post-BBC rubbishness. I doubt Hammond and May would walk out on one of TVs biggest brands. JC is replaceable and they would replace him.

I appreciate the lesson in IT. I've been tweaking Richard E Grant's name on here ever since you first introduced him to us. Surprised you haven't hosterised and filed all of my posts on your floppy disks.

A seven point swing in 10 games will come about more from a pretty significant collapse on our part more than anything Stoke do. Even if we hobble to just a point a game from now, Stoke need a pretty decent upturn in form to beat us. Seventh is pretty much ours to be honest.

You do, however, swoon over Reginald D Hall and his website. He's a man, loon fans, that thinks 7/7 was fake and is trying to sue the Prime Minister for libel for saying it wasn't. And we all know you coo over the "great resource" of a website where incredibly well balanced people post up YouTube clips of crying 9/11 firemen and rip the pi ss out of them for their terrible acting. A truly, truly great resource. And you've accused people on here including me of being paid by the government to discredit you on this forum. Seriously, you do such an astonishing job by yourself, why would anyone need to.

Just LOL that you have that as a saved image. You are unquestionably mentally ill. Anyway. Amusing that you accuse me of talking "absolute sh it" when I play back what you say yourself. You went to "find the answers" and at the end of that search you brilliantly managed to establish that the Lee Rigby murder was not all made up by the government. That's not "complete bol locks" sweetheart, that's your words.

The clue for me was his need to "search for the truth" to establish that the attack on Lee Rigby wasn't a government set up and the people weren't actually actors. The world's non-autistics managed to work that out within a nanosecond.

Not any more, as of this season.